Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 8;4(1):e11.
doi: 10.2196/cancer.7952.

Use of Social Media in the Assessment of Relative Effectiveness: Explorative Review With Examples From Oncology

Rachel Rj Kalf  1 , Amr Makady  1   2 , Renske Mt Ten Ham  1   2 , Kim Meijboom  1   3 , Wim G Goettsch  1   2 ; IMI-GetReal Workpackage 1
Affiliations

Use of Social Media in the Assessment of Relative Effectiveness: Explorative Review With Examples From Oncology

Rachel Rj Kalf et al. JMIR Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: An element of health technology assessment constitutes assessing the clinical effectiveness of drugs, generally called relative effectiveness assessment. Little real-world evidence is available directly after market access, therefore randomized controlled trials are used to obtain information for relative effectiveness assessment. However, there is growing interest in using real-world data for relative effectiveness assessment. Social media may provide a source of real-world data.

Objective: We assessed the extent to which social media-generated health data has provided insights for relative effectiveness assessment.

Methods: An explorative literature review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify examples in oncology where health data were collected using social media. Scientific and grey literature published between January 2010 and June 2016 was identified by four reviewers, who independently screened studies for eligibility and extracted data. A descriptive qualitative analysis was performed.

Results: Of 1032 articles identified, eight were included: four articles identified adverse events in response to cancer treatment, three articles disseminated quality of life surveys, and one study assessed the occurrence of disease-specific symptoms. Several strengths of social media-generated health data were highlighted in the articles, such as efficient collection of patient experiences and recruiting patients with rare diseases. Conversely, limitations included validation of authenticity and presence of information and selection bias.

Conclusions: Social media may provide a potential source of real-world data for relative effectiveness assessment, particularly on aspects such as adverse events, symptom occurrence, quality of life, and adherence behavior. This potential has not yet been fully realized and the degree of usefulness for relative effectiveness assessment should be further explored.

Keywords: patient reported outcomes; real-world data; relative effectiveness; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the literature review process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Makady A, Goettsch W. GetReal. 2015. [2018-05-05]. Glossary of definitions of common terms http://www.imi-getreal.eu/Portals/1/Documents/01%20deliverables/D1.3%20-... .
    1. HTAi [2018-05-05]. HTA Glossary: Health Technology http://htaglossary.net/health+technology .
    1. Antheunis ML, Tates K, Nieboer TE. Patients' and health professionals' use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Sep;92(3):426–31. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.020.S0738-3991(13)00265-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsuya A, Sugawara Y, Tanaka A, Narimatsu H. Do cancer patients tweet? Examining the twitter use of cancer patients in Japan. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(5):e137. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3298. http://www.jmir.org/2014/5/e137/ v16i5e137 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pew Research Center. 2013. [2018-05-05]. The diagnosis difference http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/11/26/the-diagnosis-difference/

LinkOut - more resources