Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018;27(4):362-366.
doi: 10.1159/000490740. Epub 2018 Jun 10.

Comparison of Outcomes in Conservative versus Surgical Treatments for Ludwig's Angina

Comparative Study

Comparison of Outcomes in Conservative versus Surgical Treatments for Ludwig's Angina

Benlance Ekaniyere Edetanlen et al. Med Princ Pract. 2018.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the treatment outcomes in patients with early stage Ludwig's angina who received intravenous antibiotics alone with those who received surgical decompression and intravenous antibiotics.

Subjects and methods: Individuals with early stage Ludwig's angina were studied using a retrospective cohort study design from August 1997 to September 2017. Data were collected from case notes and logbooks. Appropriate statistical tests were chosen to analyze both the independent and outcome variables. Using 2-tailed test, a level of significance of 0.05 was chosen.

Results: A total of 55 patients comprising 38 (69.1%) males and 17 (30.9%) females were studied. The conservative group had a higher number of cases that developed airway compromise (26.3%) when compared to those with surgical approach (2.9%). There was an association between the treatment approach and the development of airway compromise (χ2[1] = 4.83, p = 0.03).

Conclusion: There was a higher incidence of airway compromise in patients treated with intravenous antibiotics alone than in those treated with surgical decompression and intravenous antibiotics.

Keywords: Airway compromise; Conservative; Ludwig’s angina; Surgical; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Greenberg S, Huang J, Chang RS, Ananda SN. Surgical management of Ludwig's angina. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:540–543. - PubMed
    1. Bross-Soriano D, Arrieta Gómez, JR, Prado-Calleros H, et al. Management of Ludwig's angina with small neck incisions: 18 years experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:712–717. - PubMed
    1. Yilmaz S, Adisen MZ, Misirlioglu M, et al. Assessment of third molar impaction ­pattern and associated clinical symptoms in a central Anatolian Turkish ­population. Med Princ Pract. 2016;25:169–175. - PMC - PubMed
    1. David PR, Jacob O. Does surgical decompression in Ludwig's angina decrease hospital stay? ANZ J Surg. 2011;81:168–171. - PubMed
    1. Potter JK, Herford AS, Ellis E. Tracheotomy versus endotracheal intubation for airway management in deep neck space infection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:349–354. discussion 354–355. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances