Cost-effectiveness of nonavalent HPV vaccination among males aged 22 through 26 years in the United States
- PMID: 29887325
- PMCID: PMC6745692
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.071
Cost-effectiveness of nonavalent HPV vaccination among males aged 22 through 26 years in the United States
Abstract
Introduction: In the United States, routine human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is recommended for females and males at age 11 or 12 years; the series can be started at age 9 years. Vaccination is also recommended for females through age 26 years and males through age 21 years. The objective of this study was to assess the health impact and cost-effectiveness of harmonizing female and male vaccination recommendations by increasing the upper recommended catch-up age of HPV vaccination for males from age 21 to age 26 years.
Methods: We updated a published model of the health impact and cost-effectiveness of 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine (9vHPV). We examined the cost-effectiveness of (1) 9vHPV for females aged 12 through 26 years and males aged 12 through 21 years, and (2) an expanded program including males through age 26 years.
Results: Compared to no vaccination, providing 9vHPV for females aged 12 through 26 years and males aged 12 through 21 years cost an estimated $16,600 (in 2016 U.S. dollars) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The estimated cost per QALY gained by expanding male vaccination through age 26 years was $228,800 and ranged from $137,900 to $367,300 in multi-way sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness ratios we estimated are not so favorable as to make a strong economic case for recommending expanding male vaccination, yet are not so unfavorable as to preclude consideration of expanding male vaccination. The wide range of plausible results we obtained may underestimate the true degree of uncertainty, due to model limitations. For example, the cost per QALY might be less than our lower bound estimate of $137,900 had our model allowed for vaccine protection against re-infection. Models that specifically incorporate men who have sex with men (MSM) are needed to provide a more comprehensive assessment of male HPV vaccination strategies.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Cost-utility; Disease transmission models; Human papillomavirus; Nonavalent HPV vaccine; Vaccines.
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
The impact and cost-effectiveness of nonavalent HPV vaccination in the United States: Estimates from a simplified transmission model.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Jun 2;12(6):1363-72. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1140288. Epub 2016 Feb 18. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016. PMID: 26890978 Free PMC article.
-
Prophylaxis of cervical cancer and related cervical disease: a review of the cost-effectiveness of vaccination against oncogenic HPV types.J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Apr;16(3):217-30. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.3.217. J Manag Care Pharm. 2010. PMID: 20331326 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination for adults through age 45 years in the United States: Estimates from a simplified transmission model.Vaccine. 2020 Nov 25;38(50):8032-8039. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Oct 27. Vaccine. 2020. PMID: 33121846 Free PMC article.
-
Public health impact and cost effectiveness of routine and catch-up vaccination of girls and women with a nine-valent HPV vaccine in Japan: a model-based study.BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05632-0. BMC Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33407188 Free PMC article.
-
Should human papillomavirus vaccination target women over age 26, heterosexual men and men who have sex with men? A targeted literature review of cost-effectiveness.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(12):3010-3018. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1496878. Epub 2018 Sep 11. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018. PMID: 30024823 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness evaluations of the 9-Valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: Evidence from a systematic review.PLoS One. 2020 Jun 2;15(6):e0233499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233499. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32484811 Free PMC article.
-
Relevance of Human Papillomaviruses in Head and Neck Cancer-What Remains in 2021 from a Clinician's Point of View?Viruses. 2021 Jun 18;13(6):1173. doi: 10.3390/v13061173. Viruses. 2021. PMID: 34207440 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Through Age 45 Years in the United States.Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):22-29. doi: 10.7326/M19-1182. Epub 2019 Dec 10. Ann Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 31816629 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination strategies among men who have sex with men in China: a modeling study.Front Immunol. 2023 Jun 22;14:1197191. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1197191. eCollection 2023. Front Immunol. 2023. PMID: 37426648 Free PMC article.
-
The cost-effectiveness of controlling cervical cancer using a new 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine among school-aged girls in Australia.PLoS One. 2019 Oct 9;14(10):e0223658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223658. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31596899 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Chesson HW, Curtis CR, Gee J, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccination: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2014;63:1–30. - PubMed
-
- Markowitz LE, Meites E, Unger ER. Two vs three doses of human papillomavirus vaccine: new policy for the second decade of the vaccination program. JAMA 2016;316:2370–2. - PubMed
-
- Meites E, Kempe A, Markowitz LE. Use of a 2-dose schedule for human papillomavirus vaccination – updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:1405–8. - PubMed
-
- Lawton MD, Nathan M, Asboe D. HPV vaccination to prevent anal cancer in men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect 2013;89:342–3. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources