Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):156-164.
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000781.

An Innovative Network Approach to Coordinating a National Effort to Improve Cardiovascular Health: The Case of Million Hearts

Danielle M Varda  1 , Malcolm V Williams, Michael Schooley, Daniel Duplantier, Kayleigh Newman, Kincaid Lowe Beasley, Briana Lucido, Ashley Marshall
Affiliations

An Innovative Network Approach to Coordinating a National Effort to Improve Cardiovascular Health: The Case of Million Hearts

Danielle M Varda et al. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Mar/Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the structure, content, quality, and quantity of partnerships that developed in response to a national cardiovascular health initiative, Million Hearts.

Design: This study used a social network analysis (SNA) approach to assess the Million Hearts initiative network partnerships and identify potential implications for policy and practice.

Setting/participants: The Million Hearts network comprised a core group of federal and private sector partners that participate in Million Hearts activities and align with initiative priorities. To bound the network for the SNA, we used a list of 58 organizations (74% response rate) from a previously completed qualitative analysis of Million Hearts partnerships.

Main outcome measures: We used the online PARTNER (Program to Analyze Record and Track Networks to Enhance Relationships-www.partnertool.net) survey to collect data on individual organizational characteristics and relational questions that asked organizations to identify and describe their relationships with other partners in the network. Key SNA measures include network density, centralizations, value, and trust.

Results: Our analyses show a network that is decentralized, has strong perceptions of trust and value among its members, and strong agreement on intended outcomes. Interestingly, partners report a desire and ability to contribute resources to Million Hearts; however, the perceptions between partners are that resources are not being contributed at the level they potentially could be. The majority of partners reported that being in the network helped them achieve their goals related to cardiovascular disease prevention. The largest barrier to successful activities within the network was cited as lack of targeted funding and staff to support participation in the network.

Conclusions: The Million Hearts network described in this article is unique in its membership at the national level, agreement on outcomes, its powerful information-sharing abilities that require few resources, and its decentralized structure. We identified strategies that could be implemented to strengthen the network and its activities. By examining a national-level public-private partnership formed to address a public health issue, we can identify ways to strengthen the network and provide a framework for developing other initiatives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Overall Measures of Trust and Value
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Relationships Among Members of Million Hearts, Showing Activities That Members Engage in Together Abbreviation: CVD, cardiovascular disease.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Data Comparing Million Hearts Across Other Types of Networks
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Valente TW, Chou CP, Pentz MA. Community coalitions as a system: effects of network change on adoption of evidence-based prevention. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(5):880–886. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Varda DM, Chandra A, Stern SA, Lurie N. Core dimensions of connectivity in public health collaboratives. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(5):E1–E7. - PubMed
    1. Mays GP, Scutchfield FD. Improving public health system performance through multiorganizational partnerships. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7(6):A116. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valente Thomas W Network interventions. Science. 2012;337: 6090:49–53. - PubMed
    1. Isett KR, Mergel IA, LeRoux K, Mischen PA, Rethemeyer RK. (2011). Networks in public administration scholarship: understanding where we are and where we need to go. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2011;21(suppl 1):i157–i173.