Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;63(5):1492-1499.
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13837. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs

Affiliations

The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs

Brigitte B Bruijns et al. J Forensic Sci. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

The extraction and recovery efficiency of swabs used to collect evidence at crime scenes is relatively low (typically <50%) for bacterial spores and body fluids. Cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is an interesting alternative compared to whole cells as a source for forensic analysis, but extraction and recovery from swabs has not been tested before using pure DNA. In this study cotton, foam, nylon flocked, polyester and rayon swabs are investigated in order to collect pure DNA isolated from saliva samples. The morphology and absorption capacity of swabs is studied. Extraction and recovery efficiencies are determined and compared to the maximum theoretical efficiency. The results indicate that a substantial part of DNA is not extracted from the swab and some types of swab seem to bind effectively with DNA. The efficiency of the different types of swab never exceeds 50%. The nylon flocked 4N6FLOQSwab used for buccal sampling performs the best.

Keywords: absorption capacity; cotton swabs; extraction efficiency; forensic science; nylon flocked swabs; recovery efficiency; sample collection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types