Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 11;19(1):317.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2669-5.

An intervention to support stroke survivors and their carers in the longer term (LoTS2Care): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial

Affiliations

An intervention to support stroke survivors and their carers in the longer term (LoTS2Care): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial

Anne Forster et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the evidence that many stroke survivors report longer term unmet needs, the provision of longer term care is limited. To address this, we are conducting a programme of research to develop an evidence-based and replicable longer term care strategy. The developed complex intervention (named New Start), which includes needs identification, exploration of social networks and components of problem solving and self-management, was designed to improve quality of life by addressing unmet needs and increasing participation.

Methods/design: A multicentre, cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial designed to inform the design of a possible future definitive cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) and explore the potential clinical and cost-effectiveness of New Start. Ten stroke services across the UK will be randomised on a 1:1 basis either to implement New Start or continue with usual care only. New Start will be delivered by trained facilitators and will be offered to all stroke survivors within the services allocated to the intervention arm. Stroke survivors will be eligible for the trial if they are 4-6 months post-stroke and residing in the community. Carers (if available) will also be invited to take part. Invitation to participate will be initiated by post and outcome measures will be collected via postal questionnaires at 3, 6 and 9 months after recruitment. Outcome data relating to perceived health and disability, wellbeing and quality of life as well as unmet needs will be collected. A 'study within a trial' (SWAT) is planned to determine the most acceptable format in which to provide the postal questionnaires. Details of health and social care service usage will also be collected to inform the economic evaluation. The feasibility of recruiting services and stroke survivors to the trial and of collecting postal outcomes will be assessed and the potential for effectiveness will be investigated. An embedded process evaluation (reported separately) will assess implementation fidelity and explore and clarify causal assumptions regarding implementation.

Discussion: This feasibility trial with embedded process evaluation will allow us to gather important and detailed data regarding methodological and implementation issues to inform the design of a possible future definitive cRCT of this complex intervention.

Trial registration: ISRCTN38920246 . Registered 22 June 2016.

Keywords: Cluster trial; Community; Complex intervention; Facilitated self-management; Feasibility trial; Longer term; Stroke; Study within a trial (SWAT).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval has been obtained through the Yorkshire & The Humber - Leeds East Research Ethics Committee (REC) (Ref: 16/YH/0068). Ethical approval includes agreed processes for obtaining consent (or assent) from (or on behalf of) all stroke survivors and carers with and without capacity, in line with the provisions of the Mental Capacity Act. Informed consent (or consultee declaration) will be obtained from all participants in the study.

Any protocol amendments will be approved by the REC prior to informing researchers and participating sites of any related process changes. Amendments impacting participants’ involvement will be communicated to them in an appropriate manner, as agreed by the REC.

At the time of writing, the current approved protocol is version 6, dated 18th July 2017.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SPIRIT figure. *Interventions delivered at site level for duration of trial until at least 2 months after participant recruitment approach has ended. $Further detail is provided in Table 1. % Timepoints are post-randomisation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Participant identification flow diagram. b Baseline consent and questionnaire completion flow diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Follow-up flow diagram. *Prior to posting the follow-up pack the CTRU will confirm the stroke survivors’ and carers’ survival status and current address. Subject to consent and collection of phone number from the stroke survivor/consultee/carer; CTRU will send reminders to the stroke survivor/consultee/carer via Short Message Service (SMS) text message as a prompt to complete the questionnaires

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stroke Association. State of the Nation: Stroke Statistics. 2017. https://www.stroke.org.uk/resources/state-nation-stroke-statistics.
    1. Hare R, Rogers H, Lester H, McManus R, Mant J. What do stroke patients and their carers want from community services? Fam Pract. 2006;23(1):131–136. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi098. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray J, Young J, Forster A. Review of longer-term problems after a disabling stroke. Rev Clin Gerontol. 2007;17(4):277–292. doi: 10.1017/S0959259808002608. - DOI
    1. Salter K, Hellings C, Foley N, Teasell R. The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(8):595–602. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0238. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, Sheldenkar A, Crichton S, Rudd AR, Forster A, Young J, Nazareth I, Silver LE, et al. Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1398–1403. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.598839. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms