Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 26;115(26):6644-6649.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718031115. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

Future warming increases probability of globally synchronized maize production shocks

Affiliations

Future warming increases probability of globally synchronized maize production shocks

Michelle Tigchelaar et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Meeting the global food demand of roughly 10 billion people by the middle of the 21st century will become increasingly challenging as the Earth's climate continues to warm. Earlier studies suggest that once the optimum growing temperature is exceeded, mean crop yields decline and the variability of yield increases even if interannual climate variability remains unchanged. Here, we use global datasets of maize production and climate variability combined with future temperature projections to quantify how yield variability will change in the world's major maize-producing and -exporting countries under 2 °C and 4 °C of global warming. We find that as the global mean temperature increases, absent changes in temperature variability or breeding gains in heat tolerance, the coefficient of variation (CV) of maize yields increases almost everywhere to values much larger than present-day values. This higher CV is due both to an increase in the SD of yields and a decrease in mean yields. For the top four maize-exporting countries, which account for 87% of global maize exports, the probability that they have simultaneous production losses greater than 10% in any given year is presently virtually zero, but it increases to 7% under 2 °C warming and 86% under 4 °C warming. Our results portend rising instability in global grain trade and international grain prices, affecting especially the ∼800 million people living in extreme poverty who are most vulnerable to food price spikes. They also underscore the urgency of investments in breeding for heat tolerance.

Keywords: climate change; food security; price volatility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of temperature-yield relationship. In the absence of breeding for heat tolerance, an increase in mean temperature beyond the optimum temperature (♦) will lead to a decrease in mean yield and an increase in yield variability, assuming interannual temperature variability stays the same.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Warming-induced changes in mean yield. Relative change in average yield (%) following annual mean global warming of 2 °C (Left) and 4 °C (Right).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Warming-induced changes in yield variability. (Top) Present-day CV due to all sources of variability (Left) and climate variability (Right). (Bottom) Ratio of changes in climate-driven CV following annual mean global warming of 2 °C (Left) and 4 °C (Right).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Warming-induced changes in yield variability in top-producing regions of the six largest maize-producing and -exporting countries (SI Appendix, Table S2): Probability density functions of yield anomalies with respect to present-day mean yield for present-day climate (black), following 2 °C of annual mean global warming (blue), and following 4 °C of annual mean global warming (red). The vertical gray line denotes a relative yield reduction of 20%, and boxed values indicate mean present-day yield in these areas for present-day climate (1999–2008; black) and for 2 °C (blue) and 4 °C (red) warming.

References

    1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2016 FAOSTAT database. Available at faostat3.fao.org/home/E. Accessed March 21, 2016.
    1. Naylor RL, Falcon WP. Food security in an era of economic volatility. Popul Dev Rev. 2010;36:693–723. - PubMed
    1. Wright BD. The economics of grain price volatility. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2011;33:32–58.
    1. Porter JR, et al. Food security and food production systems. In: Field CB, et al., editors. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univ Press; Cambridge, UK: 2014. pp. 485–533.
    1. Zhao C, et al. Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:9326–9331. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources