Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 6;27(3):1066-1072.
doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0016.

Clinician vs. Machine: Estimating Vocalizations Rates in Young Children With Developmental Disorders

Affiliations

Clinician vs. Machine: Estimating Vocalizations Rates in Young Children With Developmental Disorders

Shelley L Bredin-Oja et al. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of an automated language analysis system, the Language Environment Analysis (LENA), compared with a human transcriber to determine the rate of child vocalizations during recording sessions that were significantly shorter than recommended for the automated device.

Method: Participants were 6 nonverbal male children between the ages of 28 and 46 months. Two children had autism diagnoses, 2 had Down syndrome, 1 had a chromosomal deletion, and 1 had developmental delay. Participants were recorded by the LENA digital language processor during 14 play-based interactions with a responsive adult. Rate of child vocalizations during each of the 84 recordings was determined by both a human transcriber and the LENA software.

Results: A statistically significant difference between the 2 methods was observed for 4 of the 6 participants. Effect sizes were moderate to large. Variation in syllable structure did not explain the difference between the 2 methods. Vocalization rates from the 2 methods were highly correlated for 5 of the 6 participants.

Conclusions: Estimates of vocalization rates from nonverbal children produced by the LENA system differed from human transcription during sessions that were substantially shorter than the recommended recording length. These results confirm the recommendation of the LENA Foundation to record sessions of at least 1 hr.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Boxplot distributions of LENA count and human transcriber count across 14 sessions. The dots indicate sessions with outlying rates of vocalizations, whereas the asterisks are extreme outliers that are three times the interquartile range from the median. For example, Session 9 for Child 3 had an outlying rate of vocalizations for both the LENA system and the human transcriber. LENA = Language Environment Analysis.

References

    1. Bredin-Oja S. L., Fielding H., & Warren S. F. (2016, November 18). Using LENA to measure effects of a speech generating device on child vocalizations. Poster presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Philadelphia, PA.
    1. Bredin-Oja S. L., Fielding H., & Warren S. F. (2018). Effect of a speech generating device on child vocalizations. Manuscript in preparation.
    1. Caskey M., Stephens B., Tucker R., & Vohr B. (2011). Importance of parent talk on the development of preterm infant vocalizations. Pediatrics, 128, 910–916. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0609 - PubMed
    1. Caskey M., Stephens B., Tucker R., & Vohr B. (2014). Adult talk in the NICU with preterm infants and developmental outcomes. Pediatrics, 133, e578–e584. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0104 - PubMed
    1. Dykstra J. R., Sabatos-DeVito M. G., Irvin D. W., Boyd B. A., Hume K. A., & Odom S. L. (2013). Using the Language Environment Analysis (LENA) system in preschool classrooms with children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 17, 582–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361312446206 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts