C-MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
- PMID: 29894918
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.007
C-MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
Abstract
Study objective: The C-MAC laryngoscope (C-MAC) is a videolaryngoscope that uses a modified Macintosh blade. Although several anecdotal reports exist, it remains unclear whether the C-MAC is superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in the adult population.
Design: Systematic review, meta-analysis.
Setting: Operating room, intensive care unit.
Measurements: For inclusion in our analysis, studies had to be prospective randomised trials which compared the C-MAC with the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in the adult population. Data on success rates, intubation time, glottic visualisation and incidence of external laryngeal manipulations (ELM) during tracheal intubation were extracted from the identified studies. In subgroup analysis, we separated those parameters to assess the influence of the airway condition (normal or difficult) and laryngoscopists (novice or experienced). We conducted a trial sequential analysis (TSA).
Main results: Sixteen articles with 18 trials met the inclusion criteria. The C-MAC provided better glottic visualisation compared to the Macintosh (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14). TSA corrected the CI to 1.01-1.19; thus, total sample size reached the required information size (RIS). Success rates and intubation time did not differ significantly between the laryngoscopes. TSA showed that total sample size reached the RIS for success rates. The TSA Z curve surpassed the futility boundary. The C-MAC required less ELM compared to the Macintosh (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.96). TSA corrected the CI to 0.67-1.03; 52.3% of the RIS was achieved. In difficult airways, the C-MAC showed superior success rates, glottic visualisation, and less ELM compared to the Macintosh. Among experienced laryngoscopists, the C-MAC offered better glottic visualisation with less ELM than the Macintosh.
Conclusions: The C-MAC provided better glottic visualisation and less ELM (GRADE: Very Low or Moderate), with improved success rates, glottic visualisation, and less ELM in difficult airways.
Keywords: C-MAC; Macintosh laryngoscope; Tracheal intubation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
McGrath videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.J Clin Anesth. 2018 May;46:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.12.030. Epub 2018 Mar 26. J Clin Anesth. 2018. PMID: 29414609
-
Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Clin Anesth. 2018 Feb;44:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 20. J Clin Anesth. 2018. PMID: 29156438
-
Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins.Anaesthesia. 2010 May;65(5):483-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06307.x. Epub 2010 Mar 19. Anaesthesia. 2010. PMID: 20337620 Clinical Trial.
-
Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jun;32(6):425-31. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000249. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015. PMID: 25886716
-
Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for intubation performed by novice physicians in a difficult airway scenario.Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May;35(5):796-797. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 5. Am J Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28139309
Cited by
-
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy in Intubation Attempts on Adult Patients.Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022 Oct;50(5):352-357. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21367. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022. PMID: 36301284 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Endotracheal Intubations Performed With Direct Laryngoscopy and Video Laryngoscopy Scenarios With and Without Compression: A Manikin-Simulated Study.J Acute Med. 2021 Sep 1;11(3):90-98. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202109_11(3).0002. J Acute Med. 2021. PMID: 34595092 Free PMC article.
-
Video Laryngoscopy Improves the Success of Neonatal Tracheal Intubation for Novices but Not for Experienced Medical Staff.Front Pediatr. 2020 Aug 6;8:445. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00445. eCollection 2020. Front Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 32850555 Free PMC article.
-
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35373840 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of AirAngel® vs. Storz® videolaryngoscope and Macintosh® laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation training: prospective randomized crossover study.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 27;24(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05388-0. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39192254 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous