A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of epoetin-α in anemic patients with low-risk MDS
- PMID: 29895954
- PMCID: PMC6286328
- DOI: 10.1038/s41375-018-0118-9
A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of epoetin-α in anemic patients with low-risk MDS
Abstract
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are first choice for treating anemia in low-risk MDS. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy and safety of epoetin-α in IPSS low- or intermediate-1 risk (i.e., low-risk) MDS patients with Hb ≤ 10.0 g/dL, with no or moderate RBC transfusion dependence (≤4 RBC units/8 weeks). Patients were randomized, 2:1, to receive epoetin-α 450 IU/kg/week or placebo for 24 weeks, followed by treatment extension in responders. The primary endpoint was erythroid response (ER) through Week 24. Dose adjustments were driven by weekly Hb-levels and included increases, and dose reductions/discontinuation if Hb > 12 g/dL. An independent Response Review Committee (RRC) blindly reviewed all responses, applying IWG-2006 criteria but also considering dose adjustments, drug interruptions and longer periods of observation.A total of 130 patients were randomized (85 to epoetin-α and 45 to placebo). The ER by IWG-2006 criteria was 31.8% for epoetin-α vs 4.4% for placebo (p < 0.001); after RRC review, the ER was 45.9 vs 4.4% (p < 0.001), respectively. Epoetin-α reduced RBC transfusions and increased the time-to-first-transfusion compared with placebo.Thus, epoetin-α significantly improved anemia outcomes in low-risk MDS. IWG-2006 criteria for ER may require amendments to better apply to clinical studies.
Conflict of interest statement
Received research funding from Janssen-Cilag: AA, ENO, LG-K. Received research funding and honoraria from Janssen-Cilag: AS, KSG. Received honoraria from Janssen-Cilag: MHB, UP, and VS. Employees of Janssen: AP, HH, IM, RW. Johnson & Johnson stockholder: AP. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest: AG, AR, MAAS, PF, and RS.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once-weekly subcutaneous epoetin alfa in critically ill patients: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1661-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000217919.22155.85. Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16607233 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2023 Jul 29;402(10399):373-385. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00874-7. Epub 2023 Jun 10. Lancet. 2023. PMID: 37311468 Clinical Trial.
-
Luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.Lancet Haematol. 2024 Sep;11(9):e646-e658. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00203-5. Epub 2024 Jul 19. Lancet Haematol. 2024. PMID: 39038479 Clinical Trial.
-
Patients previously transfused or treated with epoetin alfa at low baseline hemoglobin are at higher risk for subsequent transfusion: an integrated analysis of the Canadian experience.Oncologist. 2006 Jan;11(1):73-82. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-1-73. Oncologist. 2006. PMID: 16401716 Review.
-
Epoetin alfa for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome-related anemia: A review of clinical data, clinical guidelines, and treatment protocols.Leuk Res. 2019 Jun;81:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 27. Leuk Res. 2019. PMID: 31005849 Review.
Cited by
-
Proposals for revised IWG 2018 hematological response criteria in patients with MDS included in clinical trials.Blood. 2019 Mar 7;133(10):1020-1030. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-06-857102. Epub 2018 Nov 7. Blood. 2019. PMID: 30404811 Free PMC article.
-
Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): The Current and Future Treatment Landscape.Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 3;31(4):1971-1993. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31040148. Curr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38668051 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Emerging Role of CD8+ T Cells in Shaping Treatment Outcomes of Patients with MDS and AML.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 22;17(5):749. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050749. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40075597 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New Approaches to Myelodysplastic Syndrome Treatment.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 May;23(5):668-687. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00965-1. Epub 2022 Mar 23. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35320468 Review.
-
Management of Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS).Curr Oncol. 2023 Jun 27;30(7):6177-6196. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070459. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37504319 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Terpos E, Mougiou A, Kouraklis A, Chatzivassili A, Michalis E, Giannakoulas N, et al. Prolonged administration of erythropoietin increases erythroid response rate in myelodysplastic syndromes: a phase II trial in 281 patients. Br J Haematol. 2002;118:174–80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03583.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Giagounidis A, Mufti GJ, Mittelman M, Sanz G, Platzbecker U, Muus P, et al. Outcomes in RBC transfusion-dependent patients with low-/intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with isolated deletion 5q treated with lenalidomide: a subset analysis from the MDS-004 study. Eur J Haematol. 2014;93:429–38. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12380. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous