Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 29:9:844.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00844. eCollection 2018.

WM in Adolescence: What Is the Relationship With Emotional Regulation and Behavioral Outcomes?

Affiliations

WM in Adolescence: What Is the Relationship With Emotional Regulation and Behavioral Outcomes?

Chiara Malagoli et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Adolescence is a fundamental transition phase, marked by physical, social, cognitive and emotional changes. At this stage in development two contrasting phenomena take place: brain changes cause a sensitivity to emotional aspects (Dahl, 2004); while also control processes register as well impressive improvements (e.g., Hooper et al., 2004; Best and Miller, 2010). The study is aimed to investigate the relationship between a core cognitive feature such as working memory (WM) (Diamond, 2013) and complex abilities such as emotion regulation (ER) and behavioral self-reported outcomes using a structural equation model approach. A sample of 227 typically developed adolescents between 14 and19 years of age (148 females; mean age in months 202.8, SD 18.57) participated in this study. The following tasks and self-reports were administered in a 45-min test session at school: Symmetry Span task (Kane et al., 2004). Reading Span task (Daneman and Carpenter, 1980), Mr. Cucumber (Case, 1985); Youth Self-Report (YSR, 11-18 years, Achenbach and Rescorla, 2001); Difficulties ER Scale (DERS, Gratz and Roemer, 2004; Italian version by Giromini et al., 2012). Results showed that difficulties in ER correlated with WM: high levels of ER difficulties are associated with low WM efficiency while no significant contributions of these predictors was observed on externalizing or internalizing symptoms. This study showed a significant relationship between self-reported difficulties in ER and WM, while no significant contribution of the considered predictors was showed on the outcomes, adding knowledge about how behavioral and emotional self-reported outcomes may relate to these processes.

Keywords: adolescence; behavioral outcomes; emotional regulation; individual differences; working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The SEM model representing the significant relationships between WM, EM_K and EM_R latent factors with behavioral outcomes. The ellipses represent the latent variables, and the rectangles represent the individual tasks or questionnaires scales (manifest variables). The curved double-headed arrows represent correlations among the latent variables. The straight, single-headed arrows refer to significant associations. The standardized factor loadings are the numbers next to the straight, single-headed arrows. The error terms are shown near the observed variables at the end of the smaller, single-headed arrows. EM_K = Emotion Regulation Knowledge; EM_R = Emotion Regulation Response; WM = Working Memory; Symm_Span = Symmetry complex span; RSPAN = Reading Span; Internal = Internalizing behaviors; External = Externalizing behaviors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Achenbach T., Rescorla L. (2001). The Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.
    1. Ahmed S. P., Bittencourt-Hewitt A., Sebastian C. L. (2015). Neurocognitive bases of emotion regulation development in adolescence. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 15 11–25. 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.07.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson V., Anderson P., Northam E., Jacobs R., Catroppa C. (2001). Development of executive function through late childhood and adolescence in an Australian sample. Dev. Neuropsychol. 20 385–406. 10.1207/S15326942DN2001_5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anticevic A., Repovs G., Barch D. M. (2010). Resisting emotional interference: brain regions facilitating working memory performance during negative distraction. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 10 159–173. 10.3758/CABN.10.2.159 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balzarotti S., Biassoni F., Villani D., Prunas A., Velotti P. (2016). Individual differences in cognitive emotion regulation: implications for subjective and psychological well-being. J. Happiness stud. 17 125–143. 10.1007/s10902-014-9587-3 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources