Are patients being evaluated for periprosthetic joint infection prior to referral to a tertiary care center?
- PMID: 29896556
- PMCID: PMC5994562
- DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.10.001
Are patients being evaluated for periprosthetic joint infection prior to referral to a tertiary care center?
Abstract
Background: Patients with a painful or failed total joint arthroplasties should be evaluated for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study is to determine if patients referred to a tertiary care center had been evaluated for PJI according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) clinical practice guidelines.
Methods: One hundred thirteen patients with painful hip (43) or knee (70) arthroplasties were referred to a single provider by orthopaedic surgeons outside our practice between 2012 and 2014. We retrospectively evaluated the workup by referring physicians, including measurement of serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, performance of a joint aspiration if these values were abnormal, and obtainment of synovial fluid white blood cell count, differential, and cultures.
Results: Sixty-two of 113 patients (55%) did not have a workup that followed AAOS guidelines. Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were ordered for 64 of the 113 patients (57%). Of 25 patients with elevated inflammatory markers warranting aspiration, 15 (60%) had an aspiration attempted, with synovial fluid white blood cell, differential, and cultures obtained in 9 of 12 (75%) aspirations that yielded fluid. Of the 62 patients with an incomplete infection workup, 11 (18%) had a bone scan, 6 (10%) a computed tomography scan, and 3 (5%) a magnetic resonance imaging. Twelve of the 113 patients (11%) were ultimately diagnosed with PJI, with 5 undiagnosed prior to referral.
Conclusions: The AAOS guidelines to evaluate for PJI are frequently not being followed. Improving awareness of these guidelines may avoid unnecessary and costly evaluations and delay in the diagnosis of PJI.
Keywords: arthroplasty infection; clinical practice guidelines; diagnosis; infection workup; periprosthetic joint infection.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Serum and synovial fluid analysis for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic infection in patients with inflammatory arthritis.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Apr 4;94(7):594-600. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01318. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012. PMID: 22488615
-
Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb;473(2):498-505. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3902-5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25171935 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection-An Algorithm-Based Approach.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2047-2050. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.070. Epub 2017 Mar 2. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 28343826 Review.
-
Diagnostic Value of Synovial White Blood Cell Count and Serum C-Reactive Protein for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Knee Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3724-3728. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Jul 18. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 28800858
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum, Synovial, and Tissue Testing for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Hip and Knee Replacements: A Systematic Review.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Apr 3;101(7):635-649. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00632. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019. PMID: 30946198
Cited by
-
Physician Use of Multiple Criteria to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection May Be Less Accurate Than the Use of an Individual Test.Cureus. 2022 Nov 12;14(11):e31418. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31418. eCollection 2022 Nov. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36382315 Free PMC article.
-
Has the time come for regional periprosthetic joint infection centers in the United States? A first-year experience.J Bone Jt Infect. 2022 Mar 1;7(1):51-53. doi: 10.5194/jbji-7-51-2022. eCollection 2022. J Bone Jt Infect. 2022. PMID: 35280323 Free PMC article.
-
Discrepancies in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnostic Criteria Reporting and Use: A Scoping Review and Call for a Standard Reporting Framework.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 12;483(7):1247-57. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003457. Online ahead of print. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 40153676
-
Metal Artefact Reduction Sequences (MARS) in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) : A non-invasive approach for preoperative differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic complications?BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 28;23(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05560-x. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022. PMID: 35764987 Free PMC article.
-
Criteria-Based Periprosthetic Joint Infection Definitions: Understanding the Disconnect Between Research and Practice.Arthroplast Today. 2025 May 27;33:101720. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101720. eCollection 2025 Jun. Arthroplast Today. 2025. PMID: 40510195 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Watson H., Schmier J.K., Parvizi J. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(8 Suppl):61.e1. - PubMed
-
- Kapadia B.H., McElroy M.J., Issa K. The economic impact of periprosthetic infections following total knee arthroplasty at a specialized tertiary-care center. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(5):929. - PubMed
-
- Della Valle C., Parvizi J., Bauer T.W. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(12):760. - PubMed
-
- Della Valle C., Parvizi J., Bauer T.W. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(14):1355. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials