Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 5;3(3):e00018-18.
doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00018-18. eCollection 2018 May-Jun.

Genomics of the Uncultivated, Periodontitis-Associated Bacterium Tannerella sp. BU045 (Oral Taxon 808)

Affiliations

Genomics of the Uncultivated, Periodontitis-Associated Bacterium Tannerella sp. BU045 (Oral Taxon 808)

Clifford J Beall et al. mSystems. .

Abstract

Despite decades of research into the human oral microbiome, many species remain uncultivated. The technique of single-cell whole-genome amplification and sequencing provides a means of deriving genome sequences for species that can be informative on biological function and suggest pathways to cultivation. Tannerella forsythia has long been known to be highly associated with chronic periodontitis and to cause periodontitis-like symptoms in experimental animals, and Tannerella sp. BU045 (human oral taxon 808) is an uncultivated relative of this organism. In this work, we extend our previous sequencing of the Tannerella sp. BU063 (human oral taxon 286) genome by sequencing amplified genomes from 11 cells of Tannerella sp. BU045, including 3 genomes that are at least 90% complete. Tannerella sp. BU045 is more closely related to Tannerella sp. BU063 than to T. forsythia by gene content and average nucleotide identity. However, two independent data sets of association with periodontitis, one based on 16S rRNA gene abundance and the other based on gene expression in a metatranscriptomic data set, show that Tannerella sp. BU045 is more highly associated with disease than Tannerella sp. BU063. Comparative genomics shows genes and functions that are shared or unique to the different species, which may direct further research of the pathogenesis of chronic periodontitis. IMPORTANCE Periodontitis (gum disease) affects 47% of adults over 30 in the United States (P. I. Eke, B. A. Dye, L. Wei, G. O. Thornton-Evans, R. J. Genco, et al., J Dent Res 91:914-920, 2012), and it cost between $39 and $396 billion worldwide in 2015 (A. J. Righolt, M. Jevdjevic, W. Marcenes, and S. Listl, J Dent Res, 17 January 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517750572). Many bacteria associated with the disease are known only by the DNA sequence of their 16S rRNA gene. In this publication, amplification and sequencing of DNA from single bacterial cells are used to obtain nearly complete genomes of Tannerella sp. BU045, a species of bacteria that is more prevalent in patients with periodontitis than in healthy patients. Comparing the complete genome of this bacterium to genomes of related bacterial species will help to better understand periodontitis and may help to grow this organism in pure culture, which would allow a better understanding of its role in the mouth.

Keywords: Tannerella; WGA; oral microbiology; periodontitis; single cell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Heatmap of gANIs between various genome assemblies. Hierarchical clustering by the average method was performed using 100-ANI as the distance. Cells are colored as shown on the scale. Genomes along the vertical axis were the first in the comparison, and those on the horizontal axis were the second.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees of the Tannerella genus computed with 16S rRNA gene sequences (A) or concatenated protein sequences from 37 conserved genes (B). In both trees, Porphyromonas gingivalis W83 was used as an outgroup but was removed from the tree shown. The black dots represent branch points that are supported by bootstrap values of ≥70%. The scales represent 1% divergence. The nodes labeled “HOMD” in panel A are the representative sequences from that database. Other 16S rRNA gene sequences shown were extracted from the genomic contigs.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Venn diagram of core gene overlap of the Tannerella species. The presence of genes was evaluated using the “Profile and Alignment” tool on the IMG/ER website using thresholds of 50% identity and an E value of 10−5. Genes that are present in all genomes of each species were saved as a set, put into the “gene cart,” and evaluated for their presence in the genomes of the other species. Selected functional pathways that were found in the various categories are shown. NAM, N-acetylmuramic acid; AA, amino acid.
FIG 4
FIG 4
16S rRNA gene abundance and total gene expression of Tannerella species in healthy patient and periodontitis patient samples. (A) Fractional 16S rRNA gene abundances versus disease and periodontal pocket state for the 3 species. Data are from reference . Horizontal lines show the mean values. Wilcoxon rank sum test between healthy subjects and periodontitis patients (whose deep pockets were sampled). T. forsythia P = 1.01 × 10–8; Tannerella sp. BU045 P = 0.00039; Tannerella sp. BU063 P = 0.028. (B) Fraction of metatranscriptomic bacterial protein-coding gene expression for the species in samples from periodontitis patients and healthy controls. Raw data are from reference . Horizontal line segments indicate mean values. Wilcoxon rank sum tests: T. forsythia P = 0.0420; Tannerella sp. BU045 P = 0.0312; Tannerella sp. BU063 P = 0.875.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harris S, Croft J, O’Flynn C, Deusch O, Colyer A, Allsopp J, Milella L, Davis IJ. 2015. A pyrosequencing investigation of differences in the feline subgingival microbiota in health, gingivitis and mild periodontitis. PLoS One 10:e0136986. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136986. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Booij-Vrieling HE, van der Reijden WA, Houwers DJ, de Wit WEAJ, Bosch-Tijhof CJ, Penning LC, van Winkelhoff AJ, Hazewinkel HAW. 2010. Comparison of periodontal pathogens between cats and their owners. Vet Microbiol 144:147–152. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oh C, Lee K, Cheong Y, Lee SW, Park SY, Song CS, Choi IS, Lee JB. 2015. Comparison of the oral microbiomes of canines and their owners using next-generation sequencing. PLoS One 10:e0131468. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131468. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gao W, Chan Y, You M, Lacap-Bugler DC, Leung WK, Watt RM. 2016. In-depth snapshot of the equine subgingival microbiome. Microb Pathog 94:76–89. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2015.11.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sakamoto M, Suzuki M, Umeda M, Ishikawa I, Benno Y. 2002. Reclassification of Bacteroides forsythus (Tanner et al. 1986) as Tannerella forsythensis corrig., gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:841–849. doi:10.1099/00207713-52-3-841. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources