Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 13;6(6):CD012270.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012270.pub2.

Iridotomy to slow progression of visual field loss in angle-closure glaucoma

Jimmy T Le  1 , Benjamin Rouse, Gus Gazzard
Affiliations

Iridotomy to slow progression of visual field loss in angle-closure glaucoma

Jimmy T Le et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Primary angle-closure glaucoma is a type of glaucoma associated with a physically obstructed anterior chamber angle. Obstruction of the anterior chamber angle blocks drainage of fluids (aqueous humor) within the eye and may raise intraocular pressure (IOP). Elevated IOP is associated with glaucomatous optic nerve damage and visual field loss. Laser peripheral iridotomy (often just called 'iridotomy') is a procedure to eliminate pupillary block by allowing aqueous humor to pass directly from the posterior to anterior chamber through use of a laser to create a hole in the iris. It is commonly used to treat patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma, patients with primary angle closure (narrow angles and no signs of glaucomatous optic neuropathy), and patients who are primary angle-closure suspects (patients with reversible obstruction). The effectiveness of iridotomy on slowing progression of visual field loss, however, is uncertain.

Objectives: To assess the effects of iridotomy compared with no iridotomy for primary angle-closure glaucoma, primary angle closure, and primary angle-closure suspects.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 9) which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; MEDLINE Ovid; Embase Ovid; PubMed; LILACS; ClinicalTrials.gov; and the ICTRP. The date of the search was 18 October 2017.

Selection criteria: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared iridotomy to no iridotomy in primary angle-closure suspects, patients with primary angle closure, or patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma in one or both eyes were eligible.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors worked independently to extract data on study characteristics, outcomes for the review, and risk of bias in the included studies. We resolved differences through discussion.

Main results: We identified two trials (2502 eyes of 1251 participants) that compared iridotomy to no iridotomy. Both trials recruited primary angle suspects from Asia and randomized one eye of each participant to iridotomy and the other to no iridotomy. Because the full trial reports are not yet available for both trials, no data are available to assess the effectiveness of iridotomy on slowing progression of visual field loss, change in IOP, need for additional surgeries, number of medications needed to control IOP, mean change in best-corrected visual acuity, and quality of life. Based on currently reported data, one trial showed evidence that iridotomy increases angle width at 18 months (by 12.70°, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.06° to 13.34°, involving 1550 eyes, moderate-certainty evidence) and may be associated with IOP spikes at one hour after treatment (risk ratio 24.00 (95% CI 7.60 to 75.83), involving 1468 eyes, low-certainty evidence). The risk of bias of the two studies was overall unclear due to lack of availability of a full trial report.

Authors' conclusions: The available studies that directly compared iridotomy to no iridotomy have not yet published full trial reports. At present, we cannot draw reliable conclusions based on randomized controlled trials as to whether iridotomy slows progression of visual field loss at one year compared to no iridotomy. Full publication of the results from the studies may clarify the benefits of iridotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JL: none known. BR: none known. GG has received travel funding and both educational and unrestricted research funding from pharmaceutical and equipment manufacturers that are involved in the treatment of glaucoma; however none of the funding is otherwise related to (or competing with) the subject of this review.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Iridotomy vs No treatment, Outcome 1 Angle Width.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Iridotomy vs No treatment, Outcome 2 Adverse events.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

ANA‐LIS {published data only}
    1. Ang M, Kumar R, Chew PT, Wong HT, Friedman DS, Baskaran M, et al. Effect of prophylactic laser iridotomy on the corneal endothelium in eyes with narrow drainage angles. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2008:ARVO E‐ Abstract 1228.
    1. Baskaran M, Yang E, Trikha S, Kumar RS, Wong HT, He M, et al. Residual angle closure one year after laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure suspects. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2017;183:111‐7. - PubMed
    1. How AC, Baskaran M, Kumar RS, He M, Foster PJ, Lavanya R, et al. Changes in anterior segment morphology after laser peripheral iridotomy: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology 2012;119(7):1383‐7. - PubMed
    1. Kumar RS, Baskaran M, Chew PT, Friedman DS, Handa S, Lavanya R, et al. Prevalence of plateau iris in primary angle closure suspects an ultrasound biomicroscopy study. Ophthalmology 2008;115(3):430‐4. - PubMed
    1. Kumar RS, Baskaran M, Friedman DS, Xu Y, Wong HT, Lavanya R, et al. Effect of prophylactic laser iridotomy on corneal endothelial cell density over 3 years in primary angle closure suspects. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2013;97(3):258‐61. - PubMed
ZAP {published data only}
    1. Congdon N, Yan X, Friedman DS, Foster PJ, Berg TJ, Peng M, et al. Visual symptoms and retinal straylight after laser peripheral iridotomy: the Zhongshan Angle‐Closure Prevention Trial. Ophthalmology 2012;119(7):1375‐82. - PubMed
    1. ISRCTN45213099. Zhongshan angle‐closure prevention study. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN45213099 (date assigned 6 May 2008).
    1. Jiang Y, Chang DS, Foster PJ, He M, Huang S, Aung T, et al. Immediate changes in intraocular pressure after laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle‐closure suspects. Ophthalmology 2012;119(2):283‐8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang Y, Chang DS, Zhu H, Khawaja AP, Aung T, Huang S, et al. Longitudinal changes of angle configuration in primary angle‐closure suspects: the Zhongshan Angle‐Closure Prevention Trial. Ophthalmology 2014;121(9):1699‐705. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang Y, Friedman DS, He M, Huang S, Kong X, Foster PJ. Design and methodology of a randomized controlled trial of laser iridotomy for the prevention of angle closure in southern China: the Zhongshan angle Closure Prevention trial. Ophthalmic Epidemiology 2010;17(5):321‐2. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Alberti 1988 {published data only}
    1. Alberti M, Menchini U, Pece A, Vigano C, Brancato R. Effectivity of Nd: Yag Laser iridotomy in narrow angles after mydriatic test. Annali di Ottalmologia e Clinica Oculistica 1988;114(2):147‐50.
Baeteman 2007 {published data only}
    1. Baeteman C, Matonti F, Cornand E, Denis D. Clinical‐tomographic correlation of the iridocorneal opening following laser iridotomy [Corrélation clinico‐tomographique de l’ouverture de l’angle irido‐cornéen suite à une iridotomie au laser]. Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie 2007;30(3):314‐5. - PubMed
Bass 1979 {published data only}
    1. Bass MS, Cleary CV, Perkins ES, Wheeler CB. Single treatment laser iridotomy. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1979;63(1):29‐30. - PMC - PubMed
Bourne, 2016 {published data only}
    1. Bourne RR, Sanchez‐Parra L, Zhekov I, Kean J, Buckley R, Parker M, et al. Changes in anterior chamber angle morphology and diurnal intraocular pressure fluctuation following Argon Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty for angle closure, measured with Swept‐source Ocular Coherence Tomography: the IMPACT Study (NIHR ID: CCRN 8955). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2016; Vol. 57:ARVO E‐ abstract 5612.
Defranco 1989 {published data only}
    1. Defranco N, Battistini P, Lippera S. Treatment of chronic closed angle glaucoma with Yag laser iridoclasia. Atti della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi 1989;44(4):827‐30.
Dimopoulos 1974 {published data only}
    1. Dimopoulos H. The use of laser for glaucoma (Greek). Oftalchron 1974;11(2‐3):72‐8.
Harada 1989 {published data only}
    1. Harada T, Mizuno K, Awaya S. Yag laser iridotomies pretreated by argon laser. Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie 1989;12(8‐9):545‐8. - PubMed
Harada 1990 {published data only}
    1. Harada T, Mizuno K, Hogiruchi M, Awaya S. Results of YAG‐laser iridotomy in 46 eyes with occluded or occludable angle. Folia Ophthalmologica Japonica 1990;41(1):210‐1.
Haut 1983 {published data only}
    1. Haut J, Effenterre G, Flamand M, Camboulives D, M'Rad A. Has laser iridectomy definitely replaced surgical peripheral iridectomy in angle‐closure glaucoma?. Bulletin des Societes d'Ophtalmologie de France 1983;83(10):1093‐5. - PubMed
He 2007 {published data only}
    1. He M, Friedman DS, Ge J, Huang W, Jin C, Lee PS, et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle‐closure suspects: biometric and gonioscopic outcomes: the Liwan Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2007;114(3):494‐500. - PubMed
He 2007a {published data only}
    1. He M, Friedman DS, Ge J, Huang W, Jin C, Cai X, et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy in eyes with narrow drainage angles: ultrasound biomicroscopy outcomes. The Liwan Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2007;114(8):1513‐9. - PubMed
Jin 1986 {published data only}
    1. Jin JC, Hu C, Liu XL. Argon laser treatment for primary angle‐closure glaucoma. Yen Ko Hsueh Pao [Eye Science] 1986;2(1):33‐8. - PubMed
Leroy 1983 {published data only}
    1. Leroy L. Argon laser in acute glaucoma. Prevention and treatment. Soins ‐ Chirurgie 1983, (28‐29):54‐5. - PubMed
Pollack 1981 {published data only}
    1. Pollack IP. Laser iridotomy in the treatment of angle‐closure glaucoma. Annals of Ophthalmology 1981;13(5):549‐50. - PubMed
Schrems 1987 {published data only}
    1. Schrems W, Hofmann G, Krieglstein GK. Neodymium YAG laser iridotomy in glaucoma with narrow chamber angle and pupillary block glaucoma. Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie 1987;84(1):72‐5. - PubMed
Zhekov 2016 {published data only}
    1. Zhekov I, Sanchez‐Parra L, Kean J, Buckley R, Pardhan S, Parker M, et al. Long term changes in anterior chamber angle morphology and diurnal intraocular pressure fluctuation following Laser Peripheral Iridotomy for angle closure measured with Swept‐source Ocular Coherence Tomography: the IMPACT Study (NIHR ID: CCRN 8955). Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2016; Vol. 57:ARVO E‐Abstract 5611.

Additional references

AAO 2015
    1. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Primary Angle Closure (Preferred Practice Pattern). San Francisco: AAO, 2015.
Ang 2000
    1. Ang LP, Aung T, Chew PT. Acute primary angle closure in an Asian population: long‐term outcome of the fellow eye after prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy. Ophthalmology 2000;107(11):2092‐6. - PubMed
Aung 2001
    1. Aung T, Ang LP, Chan SP, Chew PT. Acute primary angle‐closure: long‐term intraocular pressure outcome in Asian eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2001;131(1):7‐12. - PubMed
Azuara‐Blanco 2016
    1. Azuara‐Blanco A, Burr J, Ramsay C, Cooper D, Foster PJ, Friedman DS, et al. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle‐closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;388(10052):1389‐97. - PubMed
Bonomi 2002
    1. Bonomi L. Epidemiology of angle‐closure glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. Supplement 2002;236:11‐3. - PubMed
Bourne 2013
    1. Bourne RR, Stevens GA, White RA, Smith JL, Flaxman SR, Price H, et al. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990‐2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet Global Health 2013;1(6):e339‐49. - PubMed
Caronia 1996
    1. Caronia RM, Liebmann JM, Stegman Z, Sokol J, Ritch R. Increase in iris‐lens contact after laser iridotomy for pupillary block angle closure. American Journal of Ophthalmology 1996;122(1):53‐7. - PubMed
Covidence [Computer program]
    1. Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence. Version accessed 29 November 2017. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation.
Day 2012
    1. Day AC, Baio G, Gazzard G, Bunce C, Azuara‐Blanco A, Munoz B, et al. The prevalence of primary angle closure glaucoma in European derived populations: a systematic review. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2012;96(9):1162‐7. - PubMed
Deeks 2011
    1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG editor(s). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Edwards 1982
    1. Edwards RS. Behaviour of the fellow eye in acute angle‐closure glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1982;66(9):576‐9. - PMC - PubMed
EGS 2014
    1. European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma. www.eugs.org/eng/EGS_guidelines.asp (accessed 11 March 2016).
Emanuel 2014
    1. Emanuel ME, Parrish RK 2nd, Gedde SJ. Evidence‐based management of primary angle closure glaucoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2014;25(2):89‐92. - PubMed
Fleck 1997
    1. Fleck BW, Wright E, Fairley EA. A randomised prospective comparison of operative peripheral iridectomy and Nd:YAG laser iridotomy treatment of acute angle closure glaucoma: 3 year visual acuity and intraocular pressure control outcome. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1997;81(10):884‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Foster 2000
    1. Foster PJ, Johnson GJ. Primary angle closure: classification and clinical features. In: Hitchings RA editor(s). Fundamentals of Clinical Ophthalmology. BMJ Books, 2000:142‐52.
Foster 2001
    1. Foster PJ, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in China: how big is the problem?. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2001;85(11):1277‐82. - PMC - PubMed
Foster 2002
    1. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002;86(2):238‐42. - PMC - PubMed
Friedman 2001
    1. Friedman DS. Who needs an iridotomy?. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2001; Vol. 85, issue 9:1019‐21. - PMC - PubMed
Friedman 2006
    1. Friedman DS, Vedula SS. Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005555.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
GRADEpro 2015 [Computer program]
    1. McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime). GRADEpro GDT. Version accessed 23 January 2018. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime), 2015.
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Kingman 2004
    1. Kingman S. Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2004; Vol. 82, issue 11:887‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Lim 2005
    1. Lim LS, Husain R, Gazzard G, Seah SK, Aung T. Cataract progression after prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy: potential implications for the prevention of glaucoma blindness. Ophthalmology 2005;112(8):1355‐9. - PubMed
Mapstone 1968
    1. Mapstone R. Mechanics of pupil block. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1968;52(1):19‐25. - PMC - PubMed
Ng 2012
    1. Ng WS, Ang GS, Azuara‐Blanco A. Laser peripheral iridoplasty for angle‐closure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006746.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Nolan 2000
    1. Nolan WP, Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ, Baasanhu J. YAG laser iridotomy treatment for primary angle closure in east Asian eyes. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2000;84(11):1255‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Osborne 2003
    1. Osborne NN, Chidlow G, Wood J, Casson R. Some current ideas on the pathogenesis and the role of neuroprotection in glaucomatous optic neuropathy. European Journal of Ophthalmology 2003;13 Suppl 3:S19‐26. - PubMed
Quigley 1981
    1. Quigley HA. Long‐term follow‐up of laser iridotomy. Ophthalmology 1981;88(3):218‐24. - PubMed
Quigley 2006
    1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2006;90(3):262‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Ramulu 2007
    1. Ramulu PY, Corcoran KJ, Corcoran SL, Robin AL. Utilization of various glaucoma surgeries and procedures in Medicare beneficiaries from 1995 to 2004. Ophthalmology 2007;114(12):2265‐70. - PubMed
Resnikoff 2004
    1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2004;82(11):844‐51. - PMC - PubMed
Review Manager 2014 [Computer program]
    1. Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Robin 1984
    1. Robin AL, Pollack IP. A comparison of neodymium: YAG and argon laser iridotomies. Ophthalmology 1984;91(9):1011‐6. - PubMed
See 2011
    1. See JL, Aquino MC, Aduan J, Chew PT. Management of angle closure glaucoma. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2011;59 Suppl:S82‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Snow 1977
    1. Snow JT. Value of prophylactic peripheral iridectomy on the second eye in angle‐closure glaucoma. Transactions of the Ophthalmological Societies of the United Kingdom 1977;97(1):189‐91. - PubMed
Sterne 2001
    1. Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta‐analysis. BMJ 2001;323(7304):101‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Tham 2014
    1. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ophthalmology 2014;121(11):2081‐90. - PubMed
Thomas 2003a
    1. Thomas R, Parikh R, George R, Kumar RS, Muliyil J. Five‐year risk of progression of ocular hypertension to primary open angle glaucoma. A population‐based study. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2003;51(4):329‐33. - PubMed
Thomas 2003b
    1. Thomas R, Parikh R, Muliyil J, Kumar RS. Five‐year risk of progression of primary angle closure to primary angle closure glaucoma: a population‐based study. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 2003;81(5):480‐5. - PubMed
Yip 2010
    1. Yip JL, Foster PJ, Uranchimeg D, Javzandulam B, Javzansuren D, Munhzaya T, et al. Randomised controlled trial of screening and prophylactic treatment to prevent primary angle closure glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2010;94(11):1472‐7. - PubMed
Yu 2015
    1. Yu T, Li T, Lee KJ, Friedman DS, Dickersin K, Puhan MA. Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research on management of primary angle closure: a survey of Asia‐Pacific clinicians. Journal of Glaucoma 2015;24(5):348‐55. - PMC - PubMed
Zhang 2015
    1. Zhang ML, Hirunyachote P, Jampel H. Combined surgery versus cataract surgery alone for eyes with cataract and glaucoma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008671.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Li 2016
    1. Le JT, Rouse B, Gazzard G. Iridotomy to slow progression of angle‐closure glaucoma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012270] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources