Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198796.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198796. eCollection 2018.

Towards a deeper understanding of parenting on farms: A qualitative study

Affiliations

Towards a deeper understanding of parenting on farms: A qualitative study

Valerie Elliot et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Children living on farms experience exceptionally high risks for traumatic injury. There is a large body of epidemiological research documenting this phenomenon, yet few complementary studies that have explored the deep underlying reasons for such trends. Fundamental to this is understanding the decision-making processes of parents surrounding their choice to bring children, or not, into the farm worksite.

Objectives: To (1) document farm parent views of the risks and benefits of raising children on a family farm, and, (2) understand more deeply why children are brought into the farm worksite.

Methods: Interviews were conducted as part of a larger cohort study, The Saskatchewan Farm Injury Cohort. Subsequent to an initial mail-out question focused on parental decision-making, 11 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with rural Saskatchewan farm parents. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim, then thematically analyzed using interpretive description methodology.

Findings: This parental decision-making process on farms fundamentally involves weighing the risks vs. benefits of bringing children into the worksite, as if on a balance scale. One side of this scale holds potential risks such as exposure to physical and chemical farm hazards, in the absence of full supervision. The other side holds potential benefits such as meeting family needs for childcare, labour, and family time; building work ethic and pride; and the positive impacts of involvement and responsibility. Decision-making 'tips the scales', in part dependent upon parental perceptions of the risk-benefit trade-off. This 'perceptual lens' is influenced by factors such as: the agricultural way of life, parents' prior knowledge and past experience, characteristics of children, and safety norms.

Conclusions: This novel qualitative study provides deep insight into how Saskatchewan farm parents approach a fundamental decision-making process associated with their parenting. The proposed model provides insight into the etiology of pediatric farm injuries as well as their prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Balance scale model of the risks and benefits of bringing children into the farm work environment.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Risk-perception ‘lens’ model of factors influencing farm parents’ decision to bring children into the farm work environment.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Integrated model of farm parents’ decision-making process for bringing children into the farm work environment.

References

    1. Wright S, Marlenga B, Lee BC. Childhood agricultural injuries: An update for clinicians. Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care. 2013;43(2):20–44. 10.1016/j.cppeds.2012.08.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brison RJ, Pickett W, Berg RL, Linneman J, Zentner J, Marlenga B. Fatal agricultural injuries in preschool children: risks, injury patterns and strategies for prevention. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2006;174(12):1723–6. 10.1503/cmaj.050857 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The North American Guidelines for Children’s Agricultural Tasks (NAGCAT): Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation; [2017]. Available from: https://www.nagcat.org/nagcat/.
    1. CAIR. Agricultural fatalities in Canada, 1990–2008 Edmonton, Alberta: 2011.
    1. Green K. Farm health and safety: Rural couples’ beliefs and practices. Journal of agricultural safety and health. 1999;5(1):83.

Publication types