Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2018 Jun 26;115(26):E5847-E5848.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805120115. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

Reply to Pincheira-Donoso and Hodgson: Both the largest and smallest vertebrates have elevated extinction risk

Affiliations
Comment

Reply to Pincheira-Donoso and Hodgson: Both the largest and smallest vertebrates have elevated extinction risk

William J Ripple et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Estimated probability of being threatened versus body mass according to the original “All vertebrates” model given in Ripple et al. (2) and the “No amphibians” model, which is identical, except amphibians were removed from the dataset. In both cases, the model was a generalized linear mixed model with random intercepts based on taxonomic order and a segmented relationship with respect to mass (base 10 log-transformed). As before, all slope parameter terms were highly significant (P < 0.001). Removing amphibians from the dataset increased the pseudo-R2 from 0.317 to 0.323. These model results show that excluding amphibians from the dataset has little effect on our overall conclusions.

Comment on

References

    1. Pincheira-Donoso D, Hodgson DJ. No evidence that extinction risk increases in the largest and smallest vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E5845–E5846. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ripple WJ, et al. Extinction risk is most acute for the world’s largest and smallest vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:10678–10683. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simonsohn U. 2017 Two-lines: The first valid test of U-shaped relationships (Wharton School, Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia). Available at urisohn.com/sohn_files/papers/u_shape.pdf.
    1. Duncan RP, Williams PA. Ecology: Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis challenged. Nature. 2002;417:608–609. - PubMed
    1. Colautti RI, Maron JL, Barrett SC. Common garden comparisons of native and introduced plant populations: Latitudinal clines can obscure evolutionary inferences. Evol Appl. 2009;2:187–199. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources