Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 13;15(6):1256.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061256.

Impact of Indoor Physical Environment on Learning Efficiency in Different Types of Tasks: A 3 × 4 × 3 Full Factorial Design Analysis

Affiliations

Impact of Indoor Physical Environment on Learning Efficiency in Different Types of Tasks: A 3 × 4 × 3 Full Factorial Design Analysis

Lilin Xiong et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Indoor physical environments appear to influence learning efficiency nowadays. For improvement in learning efficiency, environmental scenarios need to be designed when occupants engage in different learning tasks. However, how learning efficiency is affected by indoor physical environment based on task types are still not well understood. The present study aims to explore the impacts of three physical environmental factors (i.e., temperature, noise, and illuminance) on learning efficiency according to different types of tasks, including perception, memory, problem-solving, and attention-oriented tasks. A 3 × 4 × 3 full factorial design experiment was employed in a university classroom with 10 subjects recruited. Environmental scenarios were generated based on different levels of temperature (17 °C, 22 °C, and 27 °C), noise (40 dB(A), 50 dB(A), 60 dB(A), and 70 dB(A)) and illuminance (60 lx, 300 lx, and 2200 lx). Accuracy rate (AC), reaction time (RT), and the final performance indicator (PI) were used to quantify learning efficiency. The results showed ambient temperature, noise, and illuminance exerted significant main effect on learning efficiency based on four task types. Significant concurrent effects of the three factors on final learning efficiency was found in all tasks except problem-solving-oriented task. The optimal environmental scenarios for top learning efficiency were further identified under different environmental interactions. The highest learning efficiency came in thermoneutral, relatively quiet, and bright conditions in perception-oriented task. Subjects performed best under warm, relatively quiet, and moderately light exposure when recalling images in the memory-oriented task. Learning efficiency peaked to maxima in thermoneutral, fairly quiet, and moderately light environment in problem-solving process while in cool, fairly quiet and bright environment with regard to attention-oriented task. The study provides guidance for building users to conduct effective environmental intervention with simultaneous controls of ambient temperature, noise, and illuminance. It contributes to creating the most suitable indoor physical environment for improving occupants learning efficiency according to different task types. The findings could further supplement the present indoor environment-related standards or norms with providing empirical reference on environmental interactions.

Keywords: environmental factor; full factorial design; indoor physical environment; learning efficiency; task type.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experiment schedule in each environmental scenario.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kosonen R., Tan F. The effect of perceived indoor air quality on productivity loss. Energy Build. 2004;36:981–986. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.06.005. - DOI
    1. Wargocki P., Wyon D.P., Sundell J., Clausen G., Fanger P.O. The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity. Indoor Air. 2000;10:222–236. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010004222.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park J.S., Yoon C.H. The effects of outdoor air supply rate on work performance during 8-h work period. Indoor Air. 2011;21:284–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00700.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saari A., Tissari T., Valkama E., Seppänen O. The effect of a redesigned floor plan, occupant density and the quality of indoor climate on the cost of space, productivity and sick leave in an office building—A case study. Build. Environ. 2006;41:1961–1972. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.012. - DOI
    1. Horr Y.A., Arif M., Kaushik A., Mazroei A., Katafygiotou M., Elsarrag E. Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: A review of the literature. Build. Environ. 2016;105:369–389. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.001. - DOI

Publication types