Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Jun;97(24):e11090.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011090.

Facet joint hypertrophy is a misnomer: A retrospective study

Sang Joon An  1 , Mi Sook Seo, Soo Il Choi, Tae-Ha Lim, So Jin Shin, Keum Nae Kang, Young Uk Kim
Affiliations
Observational Study

Facet joint hypertrophy is a misnomer: A retrospective study

Sang Joon An et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun.

Abstract

One of the major causes of lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) has been considered facet joint hypertrophy (FJH). However, a previous study asserted that "FJH" is a misnomer because common facet joints are no smaller than degenerative facet joints; however, this hypothesis has not been effectively demonstrated. Therefore, in order to verify that FJH is a misnomer in patients with LSCS, we devised new morphological parameters that we called facet joint thickness (FJT) and facet joint cross-sectional area (FJA).We collected FJT and FJA data from 114 patients with LSCS. A total of 86 control subjects underwent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as part of routine medical examinations, and axial T2-weighted MRI images were obtained from all participants. We measured FJT by drawing a line along the facet area and then measuring the narrowest point at L4-L5. We measured FJA as the whole cross-sectional area of the facet joint at the stenotic L4-L5 level.The average FJT was 1.60 ± 0.36 mm in the control group and 1.11 ± 0.32 mm in the LSCS group. The average FJA was 14.46 ± 5.17 mm in the control group and 9.31 ± 3.47 mm in the LSCS group. Patients with LSCS had significantly lower FJTs (P < .001) and FJAs (P < .001).FJH, a misnomer, should be renamed facet joint area narrowing. Using this terminology would eliminate confusion in descriptions of the facet joint.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measurement of the facet joint area on MRI at the L4-L5 level.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Measurement of the facet joint thickness on MRI at the L4-L5 level.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, et al. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J 2009;9:545–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haig AJ, Tomkins CC. Diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis. JAMA 2010;303:71–2. - PubMed
    1. Costandi S, Chopko B, Mekhail M, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: therapeutic options review. Pain Pract 2015;15:68–81. - PubMed
    1. Hughes A, Makirov SK, Osadchiy V. Measuring spinal canal size in lumbar spinal stenosis: description of method and preliminary results. Int J Spine Surg 2015;9:3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ohba T, Ebata S, Fujita K, et al. Characterization of symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis by conventional imaging. Eur Spine J 2015;24:2269–75. - PubMed

Publication types