Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 1;108(3):437-444.
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy095.

Recommendations for characterization and reporting of dietary fibers in nutrition research

Kaisa S Poutanen  1 , Susana Fiszman  2 , Cyril F M Marsaux  3 , Saara P Pentikäinen  1 , Robert E Steinert  4 , David J Mela  5
Affiliations

Recommendations for characterization and reporting of dietary fibers in nutrition research

Kaisa S Poutanen et al. Am J Clin Nutr. .

Abstract

Dietary fiber (DF) comprises a wide range of naturally occurring and modified materials with substantial variations in physical and chemical properties and potential physiologic effects. Although nutrition studies testing the effects of DF usually provide extensive detail on the physiologic responses, many still fail to adequately report the type and properties of the DF itself. This weakens the ability to directly replicate and compare studies and to establish structure-function relations. We outline the factors that affect DF functionality and provide 4 overarching recommendations for the characterization and reporting of DF preparations and DF-containing foods in nutrition research. These relate to 1) undertaking characterization methods that reflect the study hypothesis; 2) adequate reporting of DF source, quantity, and composition; 3) measurement of DF rheological properties; and 4) estimation of the DF fermentation rate and extent. Importantly, the food matrix of the test products should also be considered, because this can influence DF functionality and hence the apparent DF efficacy for health-relevant outcomes. Finally, we point out differences in DF functionality to be considered in acute and longer-term trials, the need to design the control treatment according to the research question, and the importance of reporting the amount and type of DF in the background diet.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Properties, functionalities, and physiologic effects of DF relevant to health outcomes. DF, dietary fiber.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme CODEX Alimentarius Commission Codex Alimentarius (CODEX) Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling CAC/GL 2–1985 as last amended 2010. Rome (Italy): FAO; 2010.
    1. Viebke C, Al-Assaf S, Phillips GO. Food hydrocolloids and health claims. Bioact Carbohydr Diet Fibre 2014;4:101–14.
    1. McRorie JW, McKeown NM. Understanding the physics of functional fibers in the gastrointestinal tract: an evidence-based approach to resolving enduring misconceptions about insoluble and soluble fiber. J Acad Nutr Diet 2017;117:251–64. - PubMed
    1. Dahl WJ, Stewart ML. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: health implications of dietary fiber. J Acad Nutr Diet 2015;115:1861–70. - PubMed
    1. Guillon F, Champ M. Structural and physical properties of dietary fibres, and consequences of processing on human physiology. Food Res Int. Elsevier; 2000;33:233–45.