Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Strategies After On-X Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement
- PMID: 29903344
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.535
Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Strategies After On-X Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement
Abstract
Background: The burden oral anticoagulation is a limitation of mechanical valve prostheses.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to test whether patients could be safely managed with dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (aspirin 325 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg) or lower warfarin after On-X mechanical aortic valve replacement (mAVR).
Methods: PROACT (Prospective Randomized On-X Anticoagulation Trial) (n = 576) is a multicenter (41 sites) noninferiority trial. From June 2006 through February 2014, 201 patients ≥18 years of age without thromboembolic risk factors undergoing mAVR were randomized to receive DAPT (n = 99) or standard warfarin plus aspirin (n = 102) 3 months after mAVR (low-risk arm). From June 2006 through October 2009, 375 patients with 1 or more thromboembolic risk factors were also randomized to lower intensity warfarin plus aspirin (international normalized ratio 1.5 to 2.0; n = 185) or standard warfarin plus aspirin (international normalized ratio 2.0 to 3.0; n = 190) 3 months after mAVR (high-risk arm).
Results: The low-risk arm was terminated for excess cerebral thromboembolic events (3.12% per patient-year vs. 0.29% per patient-year, p = 0.02) in the DAPT group at up to 8.8-year follow-up (631.6 patient-years), with no differences in bleeding or all-cause mortality. High-risk arm patients experienced significantly lower major (1.59% per patient-year vs. 3.94% per patient-year, p = 0.002) and minor (1.27% per patient-year vs. 3.49% per patient-year, p = 0.002) bleeding up to 8.7-year follow-up (2,035.2 patient-years), with no differences in thromboembolism (0.42% per patient-year vs. 0.09% per patient-year, p = 0.20) and all-cause mortality.
Conclusions: DAPT was associated with higher rates of thromboembolism and valve thrombosis compared with control in the low-risk arm. International normalized ratios were safely maintained at 1.5 to 2.0 in high-risk patients, without differences in mortality or thromboembolic complications. (Randomized On-X Anticoagulation Trial [PROACT]; NCT00291525).
Keywords: anticoagulation; dual-antiplatelet therapy; mechanical aortic valve replacement; thromboembolism.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Comment in
-
Reduced-Intensity Anticoagulation for Mechanical Aortic Valve Prostheses.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jun 19;71(24):2727-2730. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.018. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29903345 No abstract available.
-
Low-Thrombogenicity Mechanical Heart Valves: Which Antithrombotic Strategy?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 9;72(15):1878-1879. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.065. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30286935 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Low-Thrombogenicity Mechanical Heart Valves: Which Antithrombotic Strategy?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 9;72(15):1879-1880. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.063. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30286937 No abstract available.
-
Anticoagulation after mechanical aortic valve implantation: is it time to act after PROACT?Ann Transl Med. 2018 Nov;6(Suppl 1):S16. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.09.08. Ann Transl Med. 2018. PMID: 30613591 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
