Infectious Complications After Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Pediatric Patients with Perforated Appendicitis: Is There a Difference in the Outcome Using Irrigation and Suction Versus Suction Only? Results of a Multicentric International Retrospective Study
- PMID: 29906215
- DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0061
Infectious Complications After Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Pediatric Patients with Perforated Appendicitis: Is There a Difference in the Outcome Using Irrigation and Suction Versus Suction Only? Results of a Multicentric International Retrospective Study
Abstract
Background: Analyzing the recent literature, it seems that the use of irrigation increases the incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses (IAAs) and infectious complications in perforated appendicitis. The aim of this study was to compare peritoneal irrigation and suction versus suction only during laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for perforated appendicitis in children.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 699 patients (460 boys and 239 girls, average age 9.8 years) who underwent LA for complicated appendicitis in six international centers of pediatric surgery over a 5-year period. The appendix was perforated with localized peritonitis in 465 cases and diffuse peritonitis in 234 patients. Irrigation + suction was used in 488 cases (group 1 [G1]), whereas suction only was used in 211 cases (group 2 [G2]).
Results: No significant difference between the two groups was found in regard to average operative time (P = .23), average time of resumption of oral diet (P = .55), average reprise of gastrointestinal transit (P = .55), and average length of hospital stay (P = .41). As for postoperative complications, the incidence of IAAs was significantly higher in G2 (41/211; 19.4%) compared with G1 (38/488; 7.7%) (P = .0000), whereas no significant difference was found between the two groups in regard to wound infection (G1: n = 2 or 0.4%; G2: n = 4 or 1.8%; P = .05) and small bowel obstruction rates (G1: n = 8 or 1.6%; G2: n = 2 or 0.9%; P = .47).
Conclusions: In contrast with the most recent literature on this topic, our results demonstrated that peritoneal irrigation and suction were associated with a lower rate of postoperative IAA formation compared with the suction-only approach in children with perforated appendicitis. In such cases, peritoneal irrigation and abdominal drainage should be the preferred methods for peritoneal toilette, with no increase in operative time and postoperative morbidity.
Keywords: children; complicated appendicitis; irrigation; laparoscopy; suction.
Similar articles
-
Peritoneal irrigation vs suction alone during pediatric appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(50):e18047. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018047. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31852066 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Copious Irrigation Versus Suction Alone During Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis in Adults.J Invest Surg. 2018 Aug;31(4):342-346. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1319995. Epub 2017 May 9. J Invest Surg. 2018. PMID: 28485994 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of Sequence of Irrigation, Suction, and Extraction in Cases of Acute Purulent Appendicitis or Gangrenous Perforated Appendicitis After Laparoscopic Appendectomy.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jul;31(7):751-755. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0610. Epub 2020 Sep 22. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021. PMID: 32960131
-
Could an abdominal drainage be avoided in complicated acute appendicitis? Lessons learned after 1300 laparoscopic appendectomies.Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):40-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Oct 12. Int J Surg. 2016. PMID: 27743898
-
Advantages comparison of peritoneal drainage versus no drainage after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a meta-analysis.BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03500-8. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39550531 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL) with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 19;10(7):e036273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036273. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32690517 Free PMC article.
-
Peritoneal irrigation vs suction alone during pediatric appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(50):e18047. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018047. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31852066 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Mar 29;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00496-6. World J Emerg Surg. 2023. PMID: 36991507 Free PMC article.
-
Aspiration versus peritoneal lavage in appendicitis: a meta-analysis.World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Sep 6;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00391-y. World J Emerg Surg. 2021. PMID: 34488825 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Peritoneal lavage during laparoscopic appendectomy for complex appendicitis is associated with increased post-operative morbidity.Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2022 Oct-Dec;19(4):241-244. doi: 10.4103/ajps.ajps_146_21. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2022. PMID: 36018206 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials