Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 15;6(6):CD012583.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012583.pub2.

Dressings and topical agents for treating venous leg ulcers

Affiliations

Dressings and topical agents for treating venous leg ulcers

Gill Norman et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Venous leg ulcers are open skin wounds on the lower leg which can be slow to heal, and are both painful and costly. The point prevalence of open venous leg ulcers in the UK is about 3 cases per 10,000 people, and many people experience recurrent episodes of prolonged ulceration. First-line treatment for venous leg ulcers is compression therapy, but a wide range of dressings and topical treatments are also used. This diversity of treatments makes evidence-based decision-making challenging, and a clear and current overview of all the evidence is required. This review is a network meta-analysis (NMA) which assesses the probability of complete ulcer healing associated with alternative dressings and topical agents.

Objectives: To assess the effects of (1) dressings and (2) topical agents for healing venous leg ulcers in any care setting and to rank treatments in order of effectiveness, with assessment of uncertainty and evidence quality.

Search methods: In March 2017 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also scanned reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses, guidelines and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting. We updated this search in March 2018; as a result several studies are awaiting classification.

Selection criteria: We included published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled adults with venous leg ulcers and compared the effects of at least one of the following interventions with any other intervention in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: any dressing, or any topical agent applied directly to an open venous leg ulcer and left in situ. We excluded from this review dressings attached to external devices such as negative pressure wound therapies, skin grafts, growth factors and other biological agents, larval therapy and treatments such as laser, heat or ultrasound. Studies were required to report complete wound healing to be eligible.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently performed study selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment and data extraction. We conducted this NMA using frequentist meta-regression methods for the efficacy outcome; the probability of complete healing. We assumed that treatment effects were similar within dressings classes (e.g. hydrocolloid, foam). We present estimates of effect with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for individual treatments focusing on comparisons with widely used dressing classes, and we report ranking probabilities for each intervention (probability of being the best, second best, etc treatment). We assessed the certainty (quality) of the body of evidence using GRADE for each network comparison and for the network as whole.

Main results: We included 78 RCTs (7014 participants) in this review. Of these, 59 studies (5156 participants, 25 different interventions) were included in the NMA; resulting in 40 direct contrasts which informed 300 mixed-treatment contrasts.The evidence for the network as a whole was of low certainty. This judgement was based on the sparsity of the network leading to imprecision and the general high risk of bias in the included studies. Sensitivity analyses also demonstrated instability in key aspects of the network and results are reported for the extended sensitivity analysis. Evidence for individual contrasts was mainly judged to be low or very low certainty.The uncertainty was perpetuated when the results were considered by ranking the treatments in terms of the probability that they were the most effective for ulcer healing, with many treatments having similar, low, probabilities of being the best treatment. The two most highly-ranked treatments both had more than 50% probability of being the best (sucralfate and silver dressings). However, the data for sucralfate was from one small study, which means that this finding should be interpreted with caution. When exploring the data for silver and sucralfate compared with widely-used dressing classes, there was some evidence that silver dressings may increase the probability of venous leg ulcer healing, compared with nonadherent dressings: RR 2.43, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.74 (moderate-certainty evidence in the context of a low-certainty network). For all other combinations of these five interventions it was unclear whether the intervention increased the probability of healing; in each case this was low- or very low-certainty evidence as a consequence of one or more of imprecision, risk of bias and inconsistency.

Authors' conclusions: More research is needed to determine whether particular dressings or topical agents improve the probability of healing of venous leg ulcers. However, the NMA is uninformative regarding which interventions might best be included in a large trial, largely because of the low certainty of the whole network and of individual comparisons.The results of this NMA focus exclusively on complete healing; whilst this is of key importance to people living with venous leg ulcers, clinicians may wish to take into account other patient-important outcomes and factors such as patient preference and cost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Gill Norman: my employment at the University of Manchester while completing this work was funded by the NIHR and focused on high‐priority Cochrane reviews in the prevention and treatment of wounds.

Maggie Westby: my employment at the University of Manchester while completing this work was funded by the NIHR and focused on high‐priority Cochrane reviews in the prevention and treatment of wounds.

Amber Rithalia: none known.

Nikki Stubbs: I have received consultancy payments from Cogora, a healthcare marketing agency, and expenses for conference attendance. Funding from pharmaceutical companies supports training and education events in the service and I have received payments for non product‐related educational sessions. These have been unrelated to the subject matter of the systematic review and have never been in support or in pursuit of the promotion of products.

Marta Soares: none known.

Jo Dumville: I received research funding from the NIHR for the production of systematic reviews focusing on high‐priority Cochrane reviews in the prevention and treatment of wounds.

Andrew Jull (peer reviewer): I was lead author of an excluded study. No other conflicts to declare.

Clifford Richardson (peer reviewer): I work at the University of Manchester and know some of the members of the author team, but do not work with them in any capacity.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Network diagram ‐ extended network, by risk of bias (3 categories) Key: green = low/unclear; yellow = high; red = very high overall risk of bias for the contrast. The number of studies for each contrast is given in Table 4.
4
4
Rankograms for the extended base‐case showing the probability that each intervention is the best, second best, third best treatment, etc.
5
5
Rankograms for all treatments in the extended base‐case network showing the probability that each intervention is the best, second best, third best treatment, etc.
6
6
Contour‐enhanced funnel plot for the extended base‐case network showing comparison‐specific pooled effect sizes 1=non‐adherent, 2=alginate, 3=blood product, 4=cadexomer iodine, 5=emollient cream, 6=film, 7=foam, 8=gentian violet, 9=growth factor,
 10=hyaluronic acid + povidone iodine, 11=hyaluronic acid, 12=hydrocolloid, 13=hydrofibre, 14=hydrogel, 15=ibuprofen, 16=octenidine,
 17=paste bandage, 18=PMM, 19=PMM silver, 20=povidone iodine, 21=saline gauze, 22=silver, 23=SSD, 24=sucralfate, 25=zinc oxide
7
7
Network diagram for the base‐case, coded by risk of bias (3 categories) Key: green = low/unclear; yellow = high; red = very high overall risk of bias for the contrast. The number of studies for each contrast is given in Table 4
8
8
Rankograms for the base‐case network showing the probability that each intervention is the best, second best, third best treatment, etc.
9
9
Rankograms for all treatments in base‐case network showing the probability that each intervention is the best, second best, third best treatment, etc.
10
10
Rankograms for the narrow sensitivity analysis showing the probability that each intervention is the best, second best, third best treatment, etc.
11
11
Comparisons of alginate with other treatments in the extended base‐case network with risk of bias
12
12
Comparisons of cadexomer iodine with other treatments in the extended base‐case network with risk of bias
13
13
Comparisons of foam with other treatments in the extended base‐case network with risk of bias
14
14
Comparisons of hydrocolloid with other treatments in the extended base‐case network with risk of bias
15
15
Comparisons of hydrofibre with other treatments in the extended base‐case network with risk of bias
16
16
Comparisons of hydrogel with other treatments in the extended base‐case network with risk of bias
17
17
Comparisons of paste bandage with other treatments in the extended base‐case network with risk of bias
18
18
Comparisons of PMM and PMM silver with other treatments in the extended base‐case network with risk of bias
19
19
Comparisons of saline gauze with other treatments in the extended base‐case network with risk of bias
20
20
Comparisons of silver and SSD with other treatments in the extended base‐case network with risk of bias
21
21
Comparisons of nonadherent with other treatments in the extended base‐case network with risk of bias
22
22
Risk of bias contributions to each NMA comparison in the extended base‐case network (vertical scale 0% to 100%)
 red = very high risk of bias, yellow = high risk of bias, green = low risk of bias
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 1 Alginate vs nonadherent.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 2 Cadexomer iodine vs nonadherent.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 3 Film vs nonadherent.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 4 Foam vs nonadherent.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 5 Hyaluronic plus povidone vs nonadherent.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 6 Hydrocolloid vs non‐adherent.
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 7 Hydrofibre vs nonadherent.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 8 Hydrogel vs nonadherent.
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 9 PMM vs nonadherent.
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 10 SSD vs nonadherent.
1.11
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 11 Foam vs alginate.
1.12
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 12 Hydrocolloid vs alginate.
1.13
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 13 Hydrofibre vs alginate.
1.14
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 14 Paste bandage vs alginate.
1.15
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 15 PMM vs alginate.
1.16
1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 16 Gentian violet vs cadexomer iodine.
1.17
1.17. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 17 Hydrocolloid vs cadexomer iodine.
1.18
1.18. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 18 Hydrocolloid vs foam.
1.19
1.19. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 19 Ibuprofen foam vs foam.
1.20
1.20. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 20 Octenidine vs foam.
1.21
1.21. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 21 Paste bandage vs foam.
1.22
1.22. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 22 PMM vs foam.
1.23
1.23. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 23 PMM silver vs foam.
1.24
1.24. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 24 Silver vs foam.
1.25
1.25. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 25 Saline gauze vs hyaluronic acid.
1.26
1.26. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 26 PMM silver vs hydrocolloid.
1.27
1.27. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 27 Povidone iodine vs hydrocolloid.
1.28
1.28. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 28 Saline gauze vs hydrocolloid.
1.29
1.29. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 29 Silver vs hydrocolloid.
1.30
1.30. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 30 Zinc oxide vs hydrocolloid.
1.31
1.31. Analysis
Comparison 1 Direct evidence ‐ included in base‐case network, Outcome 31 Sucralfate vs hydrogel.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Direct evidence ‐ not in base case network, in expanded base case, Outcome 1 Blood product vs emollient.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Direct evidence ‐ not in base case network, in expanded base case, Outcome 2 Blood product vs hydrocolloid.
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Direct evidence ‐ not in base case network, in expanded base case, Outcome 3 Blood product vs hydrogel.
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 Direct evidence ‐ not in base case network, in expanded base case, Outcome 4 Blood product vs saline gauze.
2.5
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2 Direct evidence ‐ not in base case network, in expanded base case, Outcome 5 Hyaluronic vs emollient cream.
2.6
2.6. Analysis
Comparison 2 Direct evidence ‐ not in base case network, in expanded base case, Outcome 6 Growth factor vs hydrocolloid.
2.7
2.7. Analysis
Comparison 2 Direct evidence ‐ not in base case network, in expanded base case, Outcome 7 Growth factor vs hydrogel.
2.8
2.8. Analysis
Comparison 2 Direct evidence ‐ not in base case network, in expanded base case, Outcome 8 Growth factor vs nonadherent.
2.9
2.9. Analysis
Comparison 2 Direct evidence ‐ not in base case network, in expanded base case, Outcome 9 SSD vs emollient.
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 1 A. Pichinchensis vs alginate.
3.2
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 2 Non‐adherent vs cellulose.
3.3
3.3. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 3 Phenytoin vs no treatment.
3.4
3.4. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 4 Cadexomer iodine vs standard treatment.
3.5
3.5. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 5 Honey vs standard treatment.
3.6
3.6. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 6 Papain vs hydrogel.
3.7
3.7. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 7 Shale oil vs hydrogel.
3.8
3.8. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 8 Tripeptide copper vs hydrogel.
3.9
3.9. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 9 Hydrocolloid vs collagen.
3.10
3.10. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 10 Hydrocolloid vs dextranomer.
3.11
3.11. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 11 Hydrocolloid vs magnesium sulphate.
3.12
3.12. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 12 Hydrocolloid vs nonadherent or iodine.
3.13
3.13. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 13 Ozonated oil vs zinc oxide.
3.14
3.14. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 14 Cadexomer iodine vs dextranomer.
3.15
3.15. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 15 Silica gel fibre vs standard care.
3.16
3.16. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 16 Silver vs non‐silver.
3.17
3.17. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 17 Sulphadryl vs inactive powder.
3.18
3.18. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 18 Tripeptide copper vs emollient cream.
3.19
3.19. Analysis
Comparison 3 Direct evidence ‐ not in network, Outcome 19 Tripeptide copper vs SSD.

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012583

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Alvarez 2012 {published data only}
    1. Alvarez O, Patel M, Phillips T, Menzoian J, Brown Etris M, Andriessen A. Prospective, randomized, controlled, multi‐center clinical trial of a biocellulose wound dressing for the treatment of venous ulcers. EWMA Journal 2010;10(2):23. [Abstract 5]
    1. Alvarez OM, Phillips TJ, Menzoian J O, Patel M, Andriessen A. An RCT to compare a bio‐cellulose wound dressing with a non‐adherent dressing in VLUs. Journal of Wound Care 2012;21(9):448‐53. - PubMed
Arenbergerova 2013 {published data only}
    1. Arenberger P, Elg F, Petyt J, Cutting K. Expected outcomes from topical haemoglobin spray in non‐healing and worsening venous leg ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 2015;24(5):228, 230‐2, 236. - PubMed
    1. Arenbergerova M, Engels P, Gkalpakiotis S, Dubská Z, Arenberger P. Effect of topical haemoglobin on venous leg ulcer healing. EWMA Journal 2013;13(2):25‐30. - PubMed
Armstrong 1997 {published data only}
    1. Armstrong SG, Ruckley CV. Use of a fibrous dressing in exuding leg ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 1997;6(7):322‐4. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong SH, Brown DA, Hill E, Ruckley CV, Pucheault M, Hofman D. A randomized comparative clinical trial of a new hydrofibre dressing versus an alginate dressing in the treatment of exuding leg ulcers. Fifth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1995 November 21‐4; Harrogate (UK). 1996:197‐8.
Arnold 1994 {published data only}
    1. Arnold TE, Stanley JC, Fellows EP, Moncada GA, Allen R, Hutchinson JJ, et al. Prospective, multicenter study of managing lower extremity venous ulcers. Annals of Vascular Surgery 1994;8(4):356‐62. - PubMed
Backhouse 1987 {published data only}
    1. Backhouse CM, Blair SD, Savage AP, Walton J, McCollum CN. Controlled trial of occlusive dressings in healing chronic venous ulcers. British Journal of Surgery 1987;74(7):626‐7. - PubMed
Banerjee 1997 {published data only}
    1. Banerjee AK, Levy DW, Rawlinson D. Leg ulcers: a comparative study of Synthaderm and conventional dressings. Care of the Elderly 1997;3:123‐5.
Beckert 2006 {published data only}
    1. Beckert S, Warnecke J, Zelenkova H, Kovnerystyy O, Stege H, Cholcha W, et al. Efficacy of topical pale sulfonated shale oil in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006;43(1):94‐100. - PubMed
Biland 1985 {published data only}
    1. Biland L, Hürlimann F, Goor W, Körner W F, Kündig A, Madar G, et al. Treatment of venous ulcers. A multi‐center randomized double‐blind study. VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten. Journal for Vascular Diseases 1985;14(4):383‐9. - PubMed
Bishop 1992 {published data only}
    1. Bishop JB, Phillips LG, Mustoe TA, VanderZee AJ, Wiersema L, Roach DE, et al. A prospective randomized evaluator‐blinded trial of two potential wound healing agents for the treatment of venous stasis ulcers. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1992;16(2):251‐7. - PubMed
Blair 1988a {published data only}
    1. Blair SD, Backhouse CM, Wright DD, Riddle E, McCollum CN. Do dressings influence the healing of chronic venous ulcers?. Phlebology / Venous Forum of the Royal Society of Medicine 1988;3:129‐34.
Blair 1988b {published data only}
    1. Blair SD, Backhouse CM, Wright DD, Riddle E, McCollum CN. Do dressings influence the healing of chronic venous ulcers?. Phlebology / Venous Forum of the Royal Society of Medicine 1988;3:129‐34.
Bowszyc 1995 {published data only}
    1. Bowszyc J, Silny W, Bowszyc‐Dmochowska M, Kazmierowski M, Ben‐Amer HM, Garbowska T, et al. A randomised controlled comparative clinical trial of Lyofoam versus Granuflex in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Third Conference on Advances on Wound Management; 1993 October 19‐22; Harrogate (UK). 1994:34‐7.
    1. Bowszyc J, Silny W, Bowszyc‐Dmochowska M, Kazmierowski M, Ben‐Amer HM, Garbowska T, et al. Comparison of two dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 1995;4(3):106‐10. - PubMed
Brandrup 1990 {published data only}
    1. Brandrup F, Menné T, Agren MS, Strömberg HE, Holst R, Frisén M. A randomized trial of two occlusive dressings in the treatment of leg ulcers. Acta Dermato‐Venereologica 1990;70(3):231‐5. - PubMed
Brown 2014 {published data only}
    1. Brown A, Augustin M, Junger M, Zutt M, Dissemond J, Rabe E, et al. Randomized standard‐of‐care‐controlled trial of a silica gel fibre matrix in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers. European Journal of Dermatology 2014;24(2):210‐6. - PubMed
Callam 1992 {published data only}
    1. Callam MJ, Harper DR, Dale JJ, Brown D, Gibson B, Prescott RJ, et al. Lothian and Forth Valley leg ulcer healing trial. Part 1: Elastic versus non‐elastic bandaging in the treatment of chronic leg ulceration. Phlebology 1992;7(4):136‐41.
    1. Callam MJ, Harper DR, Dale JJ, Brown D, Gibson B, Prescott RJ, et al. Lothian and Forth Valley leg ulcer healing trial. Part 2: Knitted viscose dressing versus a hydrocellular dressing in the treatment of chronic leg ulceration. Phlebology 1992;7(4):142‐5.
    1. Smith, Nephew. CTR87/29. Final report of a study to compare elastic versus non‐elastic bandaging and knitted viscose dressings (Tricotex) versus hydrophilic polyurethane dressings (Allevyn) in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers. Volume 1. 1991.
Caprio 1992 {published data only}
    1. Caprio B, Mugiano GA, Siciliano G, Zurleni F. The cost and effectiveness of modern dressings in leg ulcer care. Second European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1992 October 20‐3; Harrogate (UK). 1992:148‐9.
    1. Caprio B, Murgiano GA, Ricci E, Siciliano G, Zurleni G. The cost effectiveness of modern dressings in leg ulcer care. Fourth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1994 September 6‐9; Copenhagen, Denmark. 1995:199.
Casoni 2002 {published data only}
    1. Casoni P. Randomized trial of a new dressing in the treatment of chronic non‐healing leg ulcers. 15th Annual Congress of the American College of Phlebology; 2001 November 8‐11; La Quinta (CA). 2001:Abstract.
    1. Casoni P, Gioacchino J. Randomized trial of a new dressing in the treatment of chronic non‐healing leg ulcers. 16th Annual Congress of the American College of Phlebology; 2002 November 7‐10; Fort Lauderdale (FL). 2002:Abstract.
Charles 2002 {published data only}
    1. Charles H. Venous Ulcer Repair and Quality of Life [PhD thesis]. Buckingham (UK): Brunel University, 2001.
    1. Charles H, Callicot C, Mathurin D, Ballard K, Hart J. Randomised, comparative study of three primary dressings for the treatment of venous ulcers. British Journal of Community Nursing 2002;7((Suppl 6)):48‐54. - PubMed
    1. Charles H, Callicott C, Mathurin D, Ballard K, Hart J. A randomised, comparative study of a recently introduced hydroactive foam dressing versus two well established hydrocolloid dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers using short‐stretch compression bandages. Fourth Australian Wound Management Association Conference; 2002 March 7‐10; Adelaide, South Australia. 2002:31.
    1. Hart J, Charles H, Callicot C, Mathurin D, Ballard C, Harding KG. A randomised comparative study of a new hydroactive foam dressing versus two hydrocolloid dressings in the treatment of venous ulcers. Eighth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1998 April 26‐28; Madrid, Spain. 1999:88.
    1. Hart J, Charles H, Callicot C, Mathurin D, Ballard K, Bale S, et al. Randomised, comparative study of Cutinova foam versus Comfeel and Granuflex (improved formulation) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers ‐ interim results. 7th Annual Meeting of the European Tissue Repair Society; 1997 August 23‐26; Koln, Germany. 1997:5.
De Araujo 2016 {published data only}
    1. Araujo IC, Defune E, Abbade LP, Miot HA, Bertanha M, Carvalho LR, et al. Fibrin gel versus papain gel in the healing of chronic venous ulcers: a double‐blind randomized controlled trial. Phlebology 2016;4:4. - PubMed
Dereure 2012a {published data only}
    1. Dereure O, Czubek M, Combemale P. Efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid in treatment of leg ulcers: a double‐blind RCT. Journal of Wound Care 2012;21(3):131‐9. - PubMed
Dimakakos 2009 {published data only}
    1. Dimakakos EP, Katsenis K, Kalemikerakis J, Arkadopoulos N, Mylonas S, Arapoglou V, et al. Infected venous leg ulcers: management with silver‐releasing foam dressing. Wounds 2009;21(1):4‐8. - PubMed
Fogh 2012 {published data only}
    1. Fogh K, Andersen MB, Bischoff‐Mikkelsen M, Bause R, Zutt M, Schilling S, et al. Clinically relevant pain relief with an ibuprofen‐releasing foam dressing: results from a randomized, controlled, double‐blind clinical trial in exuding, painful venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2012;20(6):815‐21. - PubMed
    1. Fogh K, Bischoff‐Mikkelsen M, Bause R, Zutt M, Andersen MB, Jørgensen B. Results from a double‐blind RCT of an ibuprofen‐releasing foam dressing for the treatment of exuding, painful venous leg ulcers. EWMA Journal 2012;12(2):335. - PubMed
Gottrup 2008 {published data only}
    1. Gottrup F, Jørgensen B, Karlsmark T, Sibbald RG, Rimdeika R, Harding K, et al. Less pain with Biatain‐Ibu: initial findings from a randomised, controlled, double‐blind clinical investigation on painful venous leg ulcers. International Wound Journal 2007;4(Suppl 1):24‐34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gottrup F, Jørgensen B, Karlsmark T, Sibbald RG, Rimdeika R, Harding K, et al. Reducing wound pain in venous leg ulcers with Biatain Ibu: a randomized, controlled double‐blind clinical investigation on the performance and safety. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2008;16(5):615‐25. - PubMed
    1. Gottrupp F, Jørgensen B, Karlsmark T, Sibbald G, Rimdeika R, Harding K, et al. Reducing persistent wound pain with an ibuprofen‐foam: a randomised, controlled, double‐blind clinical investigation on the treatment of painful venous leg ulcers. 17th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2007 May 2‐4; Glasgow, Scotland. 2007:168. [Poster 154]
Greguric 1994 {published data only}
    1. Greguric S, Budimcic D, Soldo‐Belic A, Tudoric M, Baricevic B, Cajkovac V, et al. Hydrocolloid dressing versus a conventional dressing using magnesium sulphate paste in the management of venous leg ulcers. Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica 1994;2(2):65‐71.
Hanft 2006 {published data only}
    1. Hanft J, Serena T, Snyder R. Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of a collagen‐orc antimicrobial matrix in venous leg ulcers. 16th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2006 May 18‐20; Prague, Czech Republic. 2006:151.
    1. Hanft JR, Serena T, Snyder R. A study to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a Collagen‐ORC Antimicrobial Matrix in venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2006;14(2):A64.
    1. Westby MW. Trial details needed for Cochrane review. Email to G Norman 19 October 2016.
Hansson 1998 {published data only}
    1. Hansson C, Persson L M, Stenquist B, Nordin P, Roed‐Petersen J, Westerhof W, et al. The effects of cadexomer iodine paste in the treatment of venous leg ulcers compared with hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze dressing. Cadexomer Iodine Study Group. International Journal of Dermatology 1998;37(5):390‐6. - PubMed
Harcup 1986 {published data only}
    1. Harcup JW, Saul PA. A study of the effect of cadexomer iodine in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. British Journal of Clinical Practice 1986;40(9):360‐4. - PubMed
Harding 2001 {published data only}
    1. Harding KG, Price P, Robinson B, Thomas S, Hofman D. Cost and dressing evaluation of hydrofiber and alginate dressings in the management of community‐based patients with chronic leg ulceration. Wounds 2001;13(6):229‐36.
    1. Harding KG, Price P, Robinson B, Thomas S, Holman D. Cost and dressing evaluation of a hydrofiber and alginate dressing in the management of community‐based patients with chronic leg ulceration. Ostomy/Wound Management 2001;47(12):52.
Hokkam 2011 {published data only}
    1. Hokkam E, El‐Labban G, Shams M, Rifaat S, El‐Mezaien M. The use of topical phenytoin for healing of chronic venous ulcerations. International Journal of Surgery 2011;9(4):335‐8. - PubMed
Humbert 2013 {published data only}
    1. Humbert P, Mikosinki J, Benchikhi H, Allaert F‐A. Efficacy and safety of a gauze pad containing hyaluronic acid in treatment of leg ulcers of venous or mixed origin: a double‐blind, randomised, controlled trial. International Wound Journal 2013;10(2):159‐66. - PMC - PubMed
Ivins 2006 {published data only}
    1. Ivins N, Harding KG, Price P, Jørgensen B, Lohmann M, Gottrup F, et al. Safety and efficacy in long‐term use of a sustained silver‐releasing foam dressing: a randomized, controlled trial on venous leg ulcers. Symposium on Advanced Wound Care (SAWC) & Medical Research Forum on Wound Repair; 2006 April 30‐May 3; San Antonio (TX). 2006:Poster 12.
    1. Ivins N, Jørgensen B, Lohmann M, Harding KG, Price P, Gottrup F, et al. Safety and efficacy in long term use of a sustained silver‐releasing foam dressing: a randomised, controlled trial on venous leg ulcers. Joint Scientific Meeting of ETRS, EWMA and DGfW; 2005 September 15‐16; Stuttgart, Germany. 2005:284. [Poster 180]
Jull 2008 {published data only}
    1. Jull A. Honey and venous leg ulceration: a systematic review and randomised controlled trial [PhD thesis]. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland, 2007.
    1. Jull A, Walker N, Parag V, Molan P, Arroll B, Waters J, et al. Honey as adjuvant therapy for leg ulcers (HALT) trial: a randomized controlled trial. 16th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2006 May 18‐20; Prague, Czech Republic. 2006:Abstract 29.
    1. Jull A, Walker N, Parag V, Molan P, Rodgers A, on behalf of the Honey as Adjuvant Leg Ulcer Therapy trial collaborators. Randomized clinical trial of honey‐impregnated dressings for venous leg ulcers. British Journal of Surgery 2008;95(2):175‐82. - PubMed
    1. Jull A, Walker N, Rodgers A, Bennett D, Molan P, Arroll B, et al. Honey for leg ulcers ‐ the HALT trial. Second World Union of Wound Healing Societies Meeting; 2004 July 8‐13; Paris, France. 2004:88.
Jørgensen 2005 {published data only}
    1. Jørgensen B, Price P, Andersen KE, Gottrup F, Bech‐Thomsen N, Scanlon E, et al. The silver‐releasing foam dressing, Contreet Foam, promotes faster healing of critically colonised venous leg ulcers: a randomised, controlled trial. International Wound Journal 2005;2(1):64‐73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jørgensen B, Thomsen JK. Safety and efficacy of a new hydrocapillary dressing in the treatment of leg ulcers. 13th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2003 May 22‐24; Pisa, Italy. 2003:221.
Kalis 1993 {published data only}
    1. Kalis B. Clinical evaluation of Granuflex and dextranomer dressing in leg ulcers. Second European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1993 October 20‐23; Harrogate, UK. 1993:212.
Kelechi 2012 {published data only}
    1. Kelechi T, Mueller M, Hankin C, Bronstone A, Samies J, Bonham P. A randomized, investigator‐blinded, controlled pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a poly‐N‐acetyl glucosamine‐derived membrane material in patients with venous leg ulcers. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing 2011;38:S91. - PubMed
    1. Kelechi TJ, Mueller M, Hankin CS, Bronstone A, Samies J, Bonham PA. A randomized, investigator‐blinded, controlled pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a poly‐N‐acetyl glucosamine‐derived membrane material in patients with venous leg ulcers. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2012;66(6):e209‐15. - PubMed
Kucharzewski 2013 {published data only}
    1. Kucharzewski M, Wilemska‐Kucharzewska K, Kozka M, Splakowska M. Leg venous ulcer healing process after application of membranous dressing with silver ions. Phlebologie 2013;42(6):340‐6.
Lanzara 2008 {published data only}
    1. Lanzara S, Tacconi G, Gianesini S, Menegatti E, Federici F, Liboni A, et al. A pilot randomized trial to determine the effects of a new active dressing on wound healing of venous leg ulcers [Abstract no. 114]. EWMA Journal 2008;8(Suppl 2):76. [Abstract 114]
Leaper 1991 {published data only}
    1. Leaper DJ, Cameron S, Hewitt H, Winter A, Lucarotti ME. A community‐ and hospital‐based comparative evaluation of Comfeel ulcer dressing for chronic leg ulcers. Journal of Dermatological Treatment 1991;2(3):103‐6.
Lindsay 1986 {published data only}
    1. Lindsay G, Latta D, Lyons KG, Livingstone ED, Thomson W. A study in general practice of the efficacy of cadexomer iodine in venous leg ulcers treated on alternate days. Acta Therapeutica 1986;12:141‐7.
Luiza 2015 {published data only}
    1. Luiza Soares Rodrigues A, Guitton Renaud Baptista de Oliveira B, Omena Futuro D, Regina Secoli S. Effectiveness of papain gel in venous ulcer treatment: randomized clinical trial. Revista Latino‐Americana de Enfermagem 2015;23(3):458‐65. - PMC - PubMed
Meaume 2012 {published data only}
    1. Augustin M, Herberger K, Kroeger K, Muenter KC, Goepel L, Rychlik R. Cost‐effectiveness of treating vascular leg ulcers with UrgoStart and UrgoCell Contact. International Wound Journal 2016;13(1):82‐7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meaume S, Truchetet F, Cambazard F, Lok C, Debure C, Dalac S, et al. A randomized, controlled, double‐blind prospective trial with a Lipido‐Colloid Technology: Nano‐Oligo Saccharide Factor wound dressing in the local management of venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2012;20(4):500‐11. - PubMed
Meredith 1988 {published data only}
    1. Meredith K, Gray E. Dressed to heal. Jounral of District Nursing 1988;7(3):8‐10.
Michaels 2009 {published data only}
    1. Michaels JA, Campbell B, King B, Palfreyman SJ, Shackley P, Stevenson M. Randomized controlled trial and cost‐effectiveness analysis of silver‐donating antimicrobial dressings for venous leg ulcers (VULCAN trial). British Journal of Surgery 2009;96(10):1147‐56. - PubMed
    1. Michaels JA, Campbell WB, King BM, Macintyre J, Palfreyman SJ, Shackley P, et al. A prospective randomised controlled trial and economic modelling of antimicrobial silver dressings versus non‐adherent control dressings for venous leg ulcers: the VULCAN trial. Health Technology Assessment 2009;13(56):1‐114. - PubMed
Moffatt 1992a {published data only}
    1. Moffatt CJ, Franks PJ, Oldroyd MI, Greenhalgh RM. A randomized trial of an occlusive dressing to treat chronic non‐healing venous ulcers. Second European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1992 October 20‐23; Harrogate, UK. 1993:210‐1.
    1. Moffatt CJ, Franks PJ, Oldroyd MI, Greenhalgh RM. Randomized trial of an occlusive dressing in the treatment of chronic non‐healing leg ulcers. Phlebology 1992;7(3):105‐7.
    1. Moffatt CJ, Oldroyd MI, Dickson D. A trial of hydrocolloid dressing in the management of indolent ulceration. Journal of Wound Care 1992;1(3):20‐2. - PubMed
Moffatt 1992b {published data only}
    1. Moffatt CJ, Oldroyd MI, Franks PJ. Assessing a calcium alginate dressing for venous ulcers of the leg. Journal of Wound Care 1992;1(4):22‐4. - PubMed
Moss 1987 {published data only}
    1. Moss C, Taylor A, Shuster S. Comparative study of cadexomer iodine and dextranomer in chronic leg ulcers. Scottish Medical Journal 1984;54:25.
    1. Moss C, Taylor AE, Shuster S. Comparison of cadexomer iodine and dextranomer for chronic venous ulcers. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 1987;12(6):413‐8. - PubMed
Nelson 2007 {published data only}
    1. Dale JJ, Ruckley CV, Harper DR, Gibson B, Nelson EA, Prescott RJ. A factorial clinical trial of drugs, dressings and bandages in the treatment of leg ulcers. Fifth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1995 November 21‐24; Harrogate, UK. 1996:193‐4.
    1. Franks PJ, Bosanquet N, Brown D, Straub J, Harper DR, Ruckley CV. Perceived health in a randomised trial of single and multilayer bandaging for chronic ulceration. Phlebology 1995;95(Suppl 1):17‐9. - PubMed
    1. Franks PJ, Bosanquet N, Brown D, Straub J, Harper DR, Ruckley CV. Perceived health in a randomised trial of treatment for chronic venous ulceration. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 1999;17(2):155‐9. - PubMed
    1. Franks PJ, Bosanquet N, Brown D, Straub J, Harper DR, Ruckley CV. Perceived health in a randomised trial of treatment for chronic venous ulceration [personal communication]. Letter to: CV Ruckley (Lothian & Forth Valley Leg Ulcer Study) 11 June 1996.
    1. Nelson EA, Prescott RJ, Harper DR, Gibson B, Brown D, Ruckley CV. A factorial, randomized trial of pentoxifylline or placebo, four‐layer or single‐layer compression, and knitted viscose or hydrocolloid dressings for venous ulcers. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2007;45(1):134‐41. - PubMed
Norkus 2005 {published data only}
    1. Norkus A, Dargis V, Thomsen JK, Harding KG, Ivins N, Serra N, et al. Use of a hydrocapillary dressing in the management of highly exuding ulcers: a comparative study. Journal of Wound Care 2005;14(9):429‐32. - PubMed
Ohlsson 1994 {published data only}
    1. Lindholm C, Larsson K, Holmgren T, Möller M, Ohlsson P. Leg ulcer treatment in primary care ‐ comparison of gauze and DuoDERM in a prospective randomised study. Second European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1992 October 20‐23; Harrogate, UK. 1993:131.
    1. Ohlsson P, Larsson K, Lindholm C, Möller M. A cost‐effectiveness study of leg ulcer treatment in primary care. Comparison of saline‐gauze and hydrocolloid treatment in a prospective, randomized study. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 1994;12(4):295‐9. - PubMed
Ormiston 1985 {published data only}
    1. Ormiston MC, Seymour MT, Venn GE, Cohen RI, Fox JA. A randomised comparison of cadexomer iodine and a standard treatment in out‐patients with chronic venous ulcers. Cadexomer Iodine: a Roundtable Discussion; 1983 January 22; Munich, Germany. Berlin: Schattauer, 1983:63‐9.
    1. Ormiston MC, Seymour MT, Venn GE, Cohen RI, Fox JA. Controlled trial of Iodosorb in chronic venous ulcers. British Medical Journal 1985;291(6491):308‐10. - PMC - PubMed
Petkov 1997 {published data only}
    1. Petkov L. A comparative study of the influence of two topical wound dressings used during healing on subsequent venous ulcer recurrence. Sixth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1996 October 1‐4; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 1997:267.
Rasmussen 1991 {published data only}
    1. Rasmussen LH, Karlsmark T, Avnstorp C, Peters K, Jorgensen M, Jensen LT. Topical human growth hormone treatment of chronic leg ulcers. Phlebology 1991;6(1):23‐30.
Robson 1995 {published data only}
    1. Robson MC, Phillip LG, Cooper DM, Lyle WG, Robson LE, Odom L, et al. Safety and effect of transforming growth factor‐beta(2) for treatment of venous stasis ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 1995;3(2):157‐67. - PubMed
Robson 2001 {published data only}
    1. Robson MC, Phillips TJ, Falanga V, Odenheimer DJ, Parish LC, Jensen JL, et al. Randomized trial of topically applied repifermin (recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor‐2) to accelerate wound healing in venous ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2001;9(5):347‐52. - PubMed
Robson 2004 {published data only}
    1. Brennan M, Serena TE, Hanft J, Snyder R. Patients with venous leg ulcerations have diminished quality of life: analysis of a multi‐center randomized clinical trial. Symposium on Advanced Wound Care and The Wound Healing Society; 2010 April 17‐20; Orlando, Florida. 2010:S19. [Abstract CR‐017]
    1. Robson MC, Hanfnt J, Garner W, Jenson J, Serena T, Payne WG, et al. Healing of chronic venous ulcers is not enhanced by the addition of topical repifermin (KGF‐2) to standardized care. Journal of Applied Research 2004;4(2):302‐11.
Romanelli 2015a {published data only}
    1. Romanelli M, Mulder G, Paggi B, Macchia M, Panduri S, Dini V. The use of a collagen matrix in hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 2015;24(11):543‐4, 546. - PubMed
Romero‐Cerecero 2012 {published data only}
    1. Romero‐Cerecero O, Zamilpa‐Álvarez A, Jiménez‐Ferrer E, Tortoriello J. Exploratory study on the effectiveness of a standardized extract from Ageratina pichinchensis in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. Planta Medica 2012;78(4):304‐10. - PubMed
Rubin 1990 {published data only}
    1. Rubin JR, Alexander J, Plecha EJ, Marman C. Unna's boot vs polyurethane foam dressings for the treatment of venous ulceration. A randomized prospective study. Archives of Surgery 1990;125(4):489‐90. - PubMed
Salim 1992 {published data only}
    1. Salim AS. Role of sulphydryl‐containing agents in the management of venous (varicose) ulceration. A new approach. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 1992;17(6):427‐32. - PubMed
    1. Salim AS. The role of oxygen‐derived free radicals in the management of venous (varicose) ulceration: a new approach. World Journal of Surgery 1991;15(2):264‐9. - PubMed
Schulze 2001 {published data only}
    1. Schulze HJ, Lane C, Charles H, Ballard K, Hampton S, Moll I. Evaluating a superabsorbent hydropolymer dressing for exuding venous leg ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 2001;10(1):511‐8. - PubMed
Scurr 1994 {published data only}
    1. Scurr JH, Wilson L A, Coleridge‐Smith PD. A comparison of calcium alginate and hydrocolloid dressings in the management of chronic venous ulcers. Wounds 1994;6(1):1‐8.
Senet 2003 {published data only}
    1. Senet P. Clinical and biological study of platelets used as adjuvant therapy for venous ulcers. 20th World Congress of Dermatology; 2002 July 1‐5; Paris, France. 2002:IC1738.
    1. Senet P, Bon FX, Benbunan M, Bussel A, Traineau R, Calvo F, et al. Randomized trial and local biological effect of autologous platelets used as adjuvant therapy for chronic venous leg ulcers. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2003;38(6):1342‐8. - PubMed
Senet 2011 {published data only}
    1. Senet P, Vicaut E, Beneton N, Debure C, Lok C, Chosidow O. Topical treatment of hypertensive leg ulcers with platelet‐derived growth factor‐BB: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Dermatology 2011;147(8):926‐30. - PubMed
Senet 2014 {published data only}
    1. Senet P, Bause R, Jørgensen B, Fogh K. Clinical efficacy of a silver‐releasing foam dressing in venous leg ulcer healing: a randomised controlled trial. International Wound Journal 2014;11(6):649‐55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Senet P, Petersen B. Hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers: results from a double‐blind RCT of a silver foam dressing. EWMA Journal 2012;12(2):188.
Smith 1992 {published data only}
    1. Smith JM, Dore CJ, Charlett A, Lewis JD. A randomized trial of biofilm dressing for venous leg ulcers. Phlebology 1992;7(3):108‐13.
Smith 1994 {published data only}
    1. Smith BA. The dressing makes the difference. Trial of two modern dressings on venous ulcers. Professional Nurse 1994;9(5):348, 350‐2. - PubMed
    1. Smith BA. Venous ulcers ‐ a well‐healed dresser. Second European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1992 October 23‐23; Harrogate, UK. 1993:211.
Solovastru 2015 {published data only}
    1. Solovastru LG, Stincanu A, Ascentii A, Cappare G, Mattana P, Vata D. Randomized, controlled study of innovative spray formulation containing ozonated oil and alpha‐bisabolol in the topical treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2015;28(9):406‐9. - PubMed
Sopata 2016 {published data only}
    1. Sopata M, Kucharzewski M, Tomaszewska E. Antiseptic with modern wound dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: clinical and microbiological aspects. Journal of Wound Care 2016;25(8):419‐26. - PubMed
    1. Sopata M, Tomaszewska E, Muszynski Z, Ciupinska M. Can antiseptics with modern wound dressings have beneficial effect on venous leg ulcers treatment? Clinical and microbiological aspects. 24th Annual Meeting of the Wound Healing Society; 2014 April 23‐27; Orlando (FL). 2014:A60.
Stacey 1997 {published data only}
    1. Stacey MC, Jopp McKay AG, Rashid P, Hoskin SE, Thompson PM. The influence of dressings on venous ulcer healing. First European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1991 September 4‐6; Cardiff, UK. 1992:145‐6.
    1. Stacey MC, Jopp‐Mckay AG, Rashid P, Hoskin SE, Thompson PJ. The influence of dressings on venous ulcer healing ‐ a randomised trial. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 1997;13(2):174‐9. - PubMed
Stacey 2000 {published data only}
    1. Stacey MC, Mata SD, Trengove NJ, Mather CA. Randomised double‐blind placebo controlled trial of tropical autologous platelet lysate in venous ulcer healing. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2000;20(3):296‐301. - PubMed
Steele 1986 {published data only}
    1. Steele K, Irwin G, Dowds N. Cadexomer iodine in the management of venous leg ulcers in general practice. Practitioner 1986;230(1411):63‐8. - PubMed
Taddeucci 2004 {published data only}
    1. Taddeucci P, Pianigiani E, Colletta V, Torasso F, Andreassi L, Andreassi A. An evaluation of Hyalofill‐F plus compression bandaging in the treatment of chronic venous ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 2004;13(5):202‐4. - PubMed
Tarvainen 1988 {published data only}
    1. Tarvainen K. Cadexomer iodine (Iodosorb) compared with dextranomer (Debrisan) in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum 1988;544:57‐9. - PubMed
Thomas 1997 {published data only}
    1. Banks V, Fear M, Orpin J, Hagelstein S, Colgate G, Humphreys J, et al. A comparative open multi‐centre trial of Tielle hydropolymer dressing and Granuflex improved formulation. Fifth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1995 November 21‐24; Harrogate, UK. 1996:163‐7.
    1. Thomas S, Banks V, Bale S, Fear‐Price M, Hagelstein S, Harding KG, et al. Evaluation. A comparison of two dressings in the management of chronic wounds. Journal of Wound Care 1997;6(8):383‐6. - PubMed
Tumino 2008 {published data only}
    1. Tumino G, Masuelli L, Bei R, Simonelli L, Santoro A, Francipane S. Topical treatment of chronic venous ulcers with sucralfate: a placebo controlled randomized study. International Journal of Molecular Medicine 2008;22(1):17‐23. - PubMed
Vanscheidt 2012 {published data only}
    1. Vanscheidt W, Harding K, Téot L, Siebert J. Effectiveness and tissue compatibility of a 12‐week treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers with an octenidine based antiseptic ‐ a randomized, double‐blind controlled study. International Wound Journal 2012;9(3):316‐23. - PMC - PubMed
Vin 2002 {published data only}
    1. Delchambre J. Venous leg ulcers trials. Journal of Wound Care 2002;12(3 (Suppl)):6‐7.
    1. Vin F, Téot L, Meaume S. The healing properties of Promogran in venous leg ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 2002;11(9):335‐41. - PubMed
    1. Vin F, Téot L, Meaume S. The healing properties of Promogran in venous leg ulcers. Phlébologie 2003;56(1):77‐86. - PubMed
Zuccarelli 1992 {published data only}
    1. Zuccarelli F. A comparative study of the hydrocellular dressing Allevyn and the hydrocolloid dressing Duoderm in the local treatment of leg ulcers [Étude comparative du pansement hydrocellulaire Allevyn et du pansement hydrocolloide Duoderm dans le traitement local des ulcères de jambe]. Phlébologie 1992;45(4):529‐33. - PubMed
    1. Zuccarelli F. A study to evaluate and compare the performance of a hydrocellular dressing with a hydrocolloid dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Second European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1992 October 20‐23; Harrogate, UK. 1993:98.

References to studies excluded from this review

Acosta 1992 {published data only}
    1. Acosta FJ, Novoa Mogollon FJ, Cobo P, Bilbao Arechabaleta G, Alvarez Cantalapiedra I. Topical treatment of ulcers with growth hormone: comparative study with hydrocolloid occlusive dressing [Tratamiento tópico de las úlceras con hormona de crecimiento: estudio comparativo con apósito oclusivo hidrocoloide]. Actas Dermo‐Sifiliograficas 1992;83(11):603‐4.
Alvarez 2004 {published data only}
    1. Alvarez OM, Patel M, Booker J, Markowitz L. Effectiveness of a biocellulose wound dressing for the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers: results of a single center randomized study involving 24 patients. Wounds 2004;16(7):224‐33.
Andersen 2002 {published data only}
    1. Andersen KE, Franken CP, Gad P, Larsen A, Larsen JR, Neer PA, et al. A randomized, controlled study to compare the effectiveness of two foam dressings in the management of lower leg ulcers. Ostomy/Wound Management 2002;48(8):34‐41.
Andreev 2010 {published data only}
    1. Andreev D, Paramonov B, Sominina A, Smirnova D, Sedov M, Kiselev IO. Efficacy of the treatment of venous leg ulcers with fetal fibroblasts. EWMA Journal 2010;10(2):264. [Abstract P314]
Andriessen 2009 {published data only}
    1. Andriessen A, Polignano R, Abel M. Monitoring the microcirculation to evaluate dressing performance in patients with venous leg ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 2009;18(4):145‐6. - PubMed
Asselman 1995 {published data only}
    1. Asselman AH, Veraart J, Gronenschild E, Neumann HA. Wound healing with a new growth factor formula. 5th Annual Meeting of the European Tissue Repair Society; 1995 August 30‐September 2; Padua, Italy. 1995:362.
Bale 2004 {published data only}
    1. Bale S, Tebbie N, Price P. A topical metronidazole gel used to treat malodorous wounds. British Journal of Nursing 2004;13(11):S4‐11. - PubMed
Bartoletti 1997 {published data only}
    1. Bartoletti PL, D'Alterio R, Pepe R, Marchitelli E. A new therapeutic approach for the treatment of leg ulcers. European Wound Management Association Conference; 1997 April 27‐29; Milan, Italy. 1997:115‐6.
Bartoszewicz 2013 {published data only}
    1. Bartoszewicz M, Smutnicka D, Secewicz A, Feliks Junka A, Maczynska B, Krasowski G, et al. Effectiveness of octenidine‐based dressing in eradication of persistent bacteria colonizing venous ulcers. EWMA Journal 2013;13(Suppl 1):79.
Bastami 2012 {published data only}
    1. Bastami S, Frödin T, Ahlner J, Uppugunduri S. Topical morphine gel in the treatment of painful leg ulcers, a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial: a pilot study. International Wound Journal 2012;9(4):419‐27. - PMC - PubMed
Beitner 1985 {published data only}
    1. Beitner H. Treatment of chronic leg ulcers with topical application of benzoyl peroxide lotion. Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical and Experimental 1985;38(4):657‐60.
Belcaro 2007 {published data only}
    1. Belcaro G, Cesarone MR, Errichi BM, Renzo A, Errichi S, Ricci A, et al. Improvement of microcirculation and healing of venous hypertension and ulcers with Crystacide: evaluation with a microcirculatory model, including free radicals, laser doppler flux, and PO2/PCO2 measurements. Angiology 2007;58(3):323‐8. - PubMed
Bianchi 2018 {published data only}
    1. Bianchi C, Cazzell S, Vayser D, Reyzelman AM, Dosluoglu H, Tovmassian G, et al. A multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (EpiFix) allograft for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. International Wound Journal 2018;15(1):114‐22. - PMC - PubMed
Binic 2010 {published data only}
    1. Binic I, Jankovic A, Jankovic D, Jankovic I, Vrucinic Z. Evaluation of healing and antimicrobiological effects of herbal therapy on venous leg ulcer: pilot study. Phytotherapy Research 2010;24(2):277‐82. - PubMed
Bruckner 2009 {published data only}
    1. Bruckner M, Wild T, Schwarz C, Payrich M, Eberlein T. Autolytic wound cleansing potential of different cellulose‐based dressings. EWMA Journal 2009;9(2):170. [Abstract P46]
Bull 1995a {published data only}
    1. Bull RH, Andersen KE, Larsen AM, Leigh IM. A comparative study on two alginate dressings: Kaltostat and Comfeel: alginate dressing for exudating venous leg ulcers. Fifth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1995 November 21‐24; Harrogate, UK. 1996:273.
    1. Bull RH, Leigh IM. Alginate dressings for exudating leg ulcers: a randomized study of Comfeel: alginate dressing vs Kaltostat. Fifth Annual Meeting of the European Tissue Repair Society; 1995 August 30‐September 2; Padua, Italy. 1995:362.
Burgess 1993 {published data only}
    1. Burgess B. An investigation of hydrocolloids: a comparative prospective randomised trial of the performance of three hydrocolloid dressings. Professional Nurse 1993;8(Suppl 7):3‐6. - PubMed
    1. Burgess B, Robinson B. Comparative benefits. Nursing Times 1993;89(13):90‐2. - PubMed
Burgos 1989 {published data only}
    1. Burgos H, Herd A, Bennett JP. Placental angiogenic and growth factors in the treatment of chronic varicose ulcers: preliminary communication. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1989;82(10):598‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Cabete 2004 {published data only}
    1. Cabete D. Evaluation of the efficacy of a dressing composed of hydrocolloid, hydrofibre and polyurethane. Second World Union of Wound Healing Societies Meeting; 2004 July 8‐13; Paris, France. 2004:38.
Caetano 2009 {published data only}
    1. Caetano KS, Frade MA, Minatel DG, Santana LA, Enwemeka CS. Phototherapy improves healing of chronic venous ulcers. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery 2009;27(1):111‐8. - PubMed
Callam 1987a {published data only}
    1. Callam MJ, Harper DR, Dale JJ, Ruckley CV, Prescott RJ. A controlled trial of weekly ultrasound therapy in chronic leg ulceration. Lancet 1987;2(8552):204‐6. - PubMed
Cardinal 2009a {published data only}
    1. Cardinal M, Eisenbud DE, Armstrong DG. Wound shape geometry measurements correlate to eventual wound healing. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2009;17(2):173‐8. - PubMed
Cardinal 2009b {published data only}
    1. Cardinal M, Phillips T, Eisenbud DE, Harding K, Mansbridge J, Armstrong DG. Nonlinear modeling of venous leg ulcer healing rates. BMC Dermatology 2009;9:2. - PMC - PubMed
Carville 2008 {published data only}
    1. Carville K, Kapp S, Newall N, Saflekas S, Lewin G, Gliddon T, et al. Predicting covert and overt infection in leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial. Third Congress of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies Meeting; 2008 June 4‐8; Toronto, Canada. 2008:OR124.
Casoni 2006 {published data only}
    1. Casoni P. Laser treatment in chronic leg ulcers. Phlebolymphology 2006;14(2):113.
    1. Casoni P, Japichino G. Laser treatment in chronic nonhealing leg ulcers. UIP World Congress Chapter Meeting; 2003 August 27‐31; San Diego (CA). 2003:33.
Cervadoro 2003 {published data only}
    1. Cervadoro G, Bachini L, Andreoli S, Pedrinazzi C, Cervadoro E. Valuation of re‐epithelisation of venous leg ulcers by measurement of transcutaneous oxygen tension during systemic and topical therapy [Valutazione della riepitelizzazione di lesioni ulcero‐venose agli arti inferiori mediante rilevazione ossimetrica transcutanea in corso di terapia topica e sistemica]. Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2003;138(3):237‐42.
Chaloner 1992 {published data only}
    1. Chaloner D, Fletcher M, Milward P. Clinical trials: comparing dressings. Nursing Standard 1992;Tissue Viability Supplement(7):9‐11. - PubMed
Chaloner 2004a {published data only}
    1. Chaloner D. A comparative study of two silver containing dressings, Acticoat 7 and Avance in the treatment of chronic venous ulcers. Second World Union of Wound Healing Societies Meeting; 2004 July 8‐13; Paris, France. 2004:134.
    1. Chaloner D. A prospective, multi‐centre, randomised, comparative study to compare the effects of Acticoat 7 antimicrobial barrier dressing to Avance silver impregnated foam film dressing in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers. Unpublished report 2004.
Charles 2002a {published data only}
    1. Charles H. Venous leg ulcer pain and its characteristics. Journal of Tissue Viability 2002;12(4):154‐8. - PubMed
Cherry 1992 {published data only}
    1. Cherry GW, Powell SM, Ryan T. The efficacy of mupirocin in the management of venous leg ulcers. Second European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1992 October 20‐23; Harrogate, UK. 1993:214.
Cherry 1998 {published data only}
    1. Cherry GW, Hofman D, Poore S. Tissue repair in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers treated with Prezatide copper acetate gel or standard compression therapy. Wound Repair and Regeneration 1998;6(3):A243.
Chiummariello 2009 {published data only}
    1. Chiummariello S, Gado F, Monarca C, Ruggiero M, Carlesimo B, Scuderi N, et al. Multicentric study on a topical compound with lymph‐draining action in the treatment of the phlebostatic ulcer of the inferior limbs [Studio multicentrico su un preparato topico ad azione linfodrenante nel trattamento dell'ulcera flebostatica degli arti inferiori]. Il Giornale di Chirurgia 2009;30(11‐12):497‐501. - PubMed
Choucair 1998 {published data only}
    1. Choucair M, Faria D, Fivenson D. Use of human skin equivalent in the successful treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers. Wounds 1998;10(3):97‐104.
Collier 1992 {published data only}
    1. Collier J. A moist, odour‐free environment. A multicentred trial of a foamed gel and a hydrocolloid dressing. Professional Nurse 1992;7(12):804‐8. - PubMed
Cordts 1992 {published data only}
    1. Cordts PR, Hanrahan LM, Rodriguez AA, Woodson J, LaMorte WW, Menzoian JO. A prospective, randomized trial of Unna's boot versus Duoderm CGF hydroactive dressing plus compression in the management of venous leg ulcers [see comments]. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1992;15(3):480‐6. - PubMed
Cullen 2012 {published data only}
    1. Cullen B, Gibson M, Nisbet L. Early adoption of collagen/ORC therapies improves clinical outcome. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2012;20(5):A92.
    1. Cullen B, Gibson M, Nisbet L. Targeted use of collagen/ORC improves clinical outcomes. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2012;20(5):A93.
D'Alicandro 2003 {published data only}
    1. D'Alicandro G, Infascelli RM, Iuliano P, Silvestro M, Aprea G. Treatment of severe wounds using a multilayer dressing releasing silver crystals plus oxygen hyperbaric therapy [Abstract]. 13th Conference of the European Wound Management Association 2003 May 22‐24; Pisa, Italy. 2003:182.
Daltrey 1981 {published data only}
    1. Daltrey DC, Cunliffe WJ. A double‐blind study of the effects of benzoyl peroxide 20% and eusol and liquid paraffin on the microbial flora of leg ulcers. Acta Dermato‐Venereologica 1981;61(6):575‐7. - PubMed
Davis 1992 {published data only}
    1. Davis LB, McCulloch JM, Neal MB. The effectiveness of Unna Boot and semipermeable film vs. Unna Boot alone in the healing of venous ulcers: a pilot report. Ostomy/Wound Management 1992;38(1):19‐21. - PubMed
De Caridi 2016 {published data only}
    1. Caridi G, Massara M, Acri I, Zavettieri S, Grande R, Butrico L, et al. Trophic effects of polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid in the healing of venous ulcers of the lower limbs: a clinical study. International Wound Journal 2016;13(5):754‐8. - PMC - PubMed
De la Brassinne 2006 {published data only}
    1. Brassinne M, Thirion L, Horvat LI. A novel method of comparing the healing properties of two hydrogels in chronic leg ulcers. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2006;20(2):131‐5. - PubMed
Dereure 2012b {published data only}
    1. Dereure O, Mikosinki J, Zegota Z, Allaert FA. RCT to evaluate a hyaluronic acid containing gauze pad in leg ulcers of venous or mixed aetiology. Journal of Wound Care 2012;21(11):539‐42, 544, 546. - PubMed
Dini 2010 {published data only}
    1. Dini V, Bertone M, Miteva M, Romanelli P, Lorenzo A, Pensabene L, et al. Immunoistochemical evaluation of venous leg ulcers before and after negative pressure therapy. EWMA Journal 2010;10(2):90. [Abstract 120]
    1. Dini V, Bertone MS, Romanelli M. Biochemical markers in venous leg ulcers during treatment with topical negative pressure. EWMA Journal 2009;9(2):78. [Abstract 118]
Dini 2013 {published data only}
    1. Andriessen A, Dini V, Barbanera S, Bertone MS, Brilli C, Abel M, et al. Improvement of peri‐wound skin condition increases venous leg ulcer healing rates: RCT comparing a bio‐cellulose dressing with a foam. EWMA Journal 2011;11(Suppl 2):69.
    1. Dini V, Romanelli M, Andriessen A, Barbanera S, Bertone MS, Brilli C, et al. Improvement of periulcer skin condition in venous leg ulcer patients: prospective, randomized, controlled, single‐blinded clinical trial comparing a biosynthetic cellulose dressing with a foam dressing. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2013;26(8):352‐9. - PubMed
Dmochowska 1999 {published data only}
    1. Dmochowska M, Prokop J, Bielecka S, Urasinska K, Krolicki A, Nagaj E, et al. A randomized, controlled, parallel group clinical trial of a polyurethane foam dressing versus a calcium alginate dressing in the treatment of moderately to heavily exuding venous leg ulcers. Wounds 1999;11(1):21‐8.
Duhra 1992 {published data only}
    1. Duhra P, Blight A, Mountford E, Cheshire I, Withers A, Ilchyshyn A. A randomized controlled trial of cultured keratinocyte allografts for chronic venous ulcers. Journal of Dermatological Treatment 1992;3(4):189‐91.
Egan 1983 {published data only}
    1. Egan TJ, O'Driscoll J, Thakar DR. Human amnion in the management of chronic ulceration of the lower limb: a clinico‐pathologic study. Angiology 1983;34(3):197‐203. - PubMed
El Heneidy 2016 {published data only}
    1. Heneidy H, Omran E, Halwagy A, Al‐Inany H, Al‐Ansary M Gad A. Amniotic membrane can be a valid source for wound healing. International Journal of Women's Health 2016;8:225‐31. - PMC - PubMed
Eriksson 1984a {published data only}
    1. Eriksson G. Comparative study of hydrocolloid dressing and double layer bandage in the treatment of venous stasis ulceration. In: Ryan TJ editor(s). An Environment for Healing: The Role of Occlusion. Issue 88 of International Congress and Symposium Series. London: Royal Society of Medicine, 1984:111‐3.
Eriksson 1984b {published data only}
    1. Eriksson G, Eklund AE, Kallings LO. The clinical significance of bacterial growth in venous leg ulcers. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1984;16(2):175‐80. - PubMed
Eriksson 1984c {published data only}
    1. Eriksson G, Eklund AE, Liden S, Zetterquist S. Comparison of different treatments of venous leg ulcers: a controlled study using stereophotogrammetry. Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical and Experimental 1984;35(4):678‐84.
Eriksson 1991 {published data only}
    1. Eriksson SV, Lundeberg T, Malm M. A placebo controlled trial of ultrasound therapy in chronic leg ulceration. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1991;23(4):211‐3. - PubMed
Falabella 1998 {published data only}
    1. Falabella AF, Carson P, Eaglstein WH, Falanga V. The safety and efficacy of a proteolytic ointment in the treatment of chronic ulcers of the lower extremity. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1998;39(5 (Pt 1)):737‐40. - PubMed
Falanga 1996 {published data only}
    1. Falanga V, Carson P, Greenberg A, Hasan A, Nichols E, McPherson J. Topically applied recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for the treatment of venous ulcers. Preliminary report. Dermatologic Surgery 1996;22(7):643‐4. - PubMed
Falanga 1998 {published data only}
    1. Falanga V. Clinical trials: experience with Apligraf in chronic wounds. Wound Repair and Regeneration 1998;6(5):A466.
    1. Falanga V, Margolis D, Alvarez O, Auletta M, Maggiacomo F, Altman M, et al. Rapid healing of venous ulcers and lack of clinical rejection with an allogeneic cultured human skin equivalent. Human Skin Equivalent Investigators Group. Archives of Dermatology 1998;134(3):293‐300. - PubMed
    1. Falanga V, Saap LJ, Ozonoff A. Wound bed score and its correlation with healing of chronic wounds. Dermatologic Therapy 2006;19(6):383‐90. - PubMed
Falanga 1999 {published data only}
    1. Falanga V, Sabolinski M. A bilayered living skin construct (APLIGRAF(TM)) accelerates complete closure of hard‐to‐heal venous ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 1999;7(4):201‐7. - PubMed
Falanga 2000 {published data only}
    1. Falanga VJ. Tissue engineering in wound repair. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2000;13(Suppl 2):15‐9. - PubMed
Falanga 2001 {published data only}
    1. Falanga V, Odenheimer D, Bagchi P. Repifermin (KGF‐2) is able to reverse delayed healing in patients with high bacterial burden at presentation. Wound Healing Society 11th Annual Meeting and Educational Symposium; 2001 May 16‐18; Albuquerque (NM). 2001:149.
Farina 1997 {published data only}
    1. Farina M, Bonifati C, Dallavalle E. TEAM system in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. A comparative study. European Wound Management Association Conference; 1997 April 27‐29; Milan, Italy. 1997:50‐1.
Fernández‐Gines 2017 {published data only}
    1. Fernández‐Ginés FD, Cortiñas‐Sáenz M, Mateo‐Carrasco H, de Aranda, AN, Navarro‐Muñoz, E, Rodríguez‐Carmona R, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical sevoflurane in the treatment of chronic skin ulcers. American Journal of Health‐System Pharmacy 2017;74(9):e176‐e182. - PubMed
Fischer 1984 {published data only}
    1. Fischer H, Gilliet F, Hornemann M, Leyh F, Lindemayr H, Stegmann W, et al. Report of a multicenter clinical comparative study with various enzyme preparations. Fortschritte der Medizin 1984;102(10):281‐3. - PubMed
Floden 1978 {published data only}
    1. Floden CH, Wikstram K. Controlled clinical trial with dextranomer (debrisan) on venous leg ulcers. Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical and Experimental 1978;24(7):753‐60.
Frade 2012 {published data only}
    1. Frade MA, Assis RV, Coutinho Netto J, Andrade TA, Foss NT. The vegetal biomembrane in the healing of chronic venous ulcers. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia 2012;87(1):45‐51. - PubMed
Franek 2002 {published data only}
    1. Franek A, Król P, Kucharzewski M. Does low output laser stimulation enhance the healing of crural ulceration? Some critical remarks. Medical Engineering & Physics 2002;24(9):607‐15. - PubMed
Franks 2007 {published data only}
    1. Franks PJ, Moffatt C. A prospective randomised, factorial, multi‐centre open trial to compare the performance of a new foam dressing (Mepilex) with an existing foam dressing (Allevyn non adhesive) and to compare four layer bandaging and short stretch bandaging in the treatment of venous ulceration. Unpublished protocol for clinical trial MPX‐201‐UK. Centre for Research and Implementation of Clinical Practice. 2000.
    1. Franks PJ, Moody M, Moffatt CJ. Randomised trial of a soft silicone dressing a foam dressing in patients with chronic venous ulceration. 13th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2003 May 22‐24; Pisa, Italy. 2003:51.
    1. Franks PJ, Moody M, Moffatt CJ, Hiskett G, Gatto P, Davies C, et al. Randomized trial of two foam dressings in the management of chronic venous ulceration. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2007;15(2):197‐202. - PubMed
    1. Franks PJ, Moody M, Moffatt CJ, Martin R, Blewett R, Seymour E, et al. Randomized trial of cohesive short‐stretch versus four‐layer bandaging in the management of venous ulceration. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2004;12(2):157‐62. - PubMed
    1. Moody M, Moffatt CJ, Franks PJ. Relative performance of a soft silicone dressing and a foam dressing in patients with chronic venous ulceration. 13th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2003 May 22‐24; Pisa, Italy. 2003:52.
Freak 1992a {published data only}
    1. Freak L, Simon D, Edwards AT, McCollum CN. Comparative study of three primary dressings in the healing of chronic venous ulcers. British Journal of Surgery 1992;79(11):1235.
Freak 1994 {published data only}
    1. Freak L, Simon D, Edwards AT, Herrick SE, Ferguson M, McCollum CN. A study of topical human growth hormone on the healing of chronic venous ulcers. Second European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1992 October 20‐23; Harrogate, UK. 1993:173‐5.
    1. Freak L, Simon D, Edwards AT, Herrick SE, Ferguson M, McCollum CN. The use of topical human growth hormone on chronic venous ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 1994;3(2):68‐70. - PubMed
Fumal 2002 {published data only}
    1. Fumal I, Braham C, Paquet P, Pierard‐Franchimont C, Pierard GE. The beneficial toxicity paradox of antimicrobials in leg ulcer healing impaired by a polymicrobial flora: a proof‐of‐concept study. Dermatology 2002;204(Suppl 1):70‐4. - PubMed
Galiano 2017 {published data only}
    1. Galiano RD, Eming SA, Cargill DI, Dickerson JE, Slade HB, Andersen CA, et al. Baseline factors affecting closure of venous leg ulcers. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders 2017;5(6):829‐35.e821. - PubMed
Garcia 1984 {published data only}
    1. Garcia HG, Cobian RR, Martin JR, Konaizeh S, Rahola JG. The effect on the reparation process of dextranomer (Debrisan) in perimalleolar ulcers due to chronic venous insufficiency. Clinical Trials Journal 1984;21(3):121‐34.
Garkaz 2014 {published data only}
    1. Garkaz A. High frequency and noncontact low frequency ultrasound therapy for venous leg ulcer treatment: a randomized controlled study. Iranian Journal of Radiology 2014;11(30):S90‐S91. - PubMed
Gatti 2011 {published data only}
    1. Gatti MA, Vieira LM, Barraviera B, Barraviera S. Treatment of venous ulcers with fibrin sealant derived from snake venom. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases 2011;17(2):226‐9.
Gethin 2008 {published data only}
    1. Gethin G, Cowman S. Bacteriological changes in sloughy venous leg ulcers treated with manuka honey or hydrogel: an RCT. Journal of Wound Care 2008;17(6):241‐6. - PubMed
    1. Gethin G, Cowman S. Manuka honey versus hydrogel to deslough venous leg ulcers ‐ a randomised controlled trial. 3rd Congress of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies Meeting; 2008 June 4‐8; Toronto, Canada. 2008:OR004.
    1. Gethin G, Cowman S. Manuka honey versus hydrogel to deslough venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial. 17th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2007 May 2‐4; Glasgow, Scotland. 2007:29.
    1. Gethin G, Cowman S. Retraction statement: Manuka honey vs. hydrogel ‐ a prospective, open label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial to compare desloughing efficacy and healing outcomes in venous ulcers [Retraction of Gethin G, Cowman S. Manuka honey vs. hydrogel. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2009 Feb;18(3):466‐74; PMID: 18752540]. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2015;24(17/18):2686. - PubMed
Ghatnekar 2015 {published data only}
    1. Ghatnekar GS, Grek CL, Armstrong DG, Desai SC, Gourdie RG. The effect of a connexin43‐based peptide on the healing of chronic venous leg ulcers: a multicenter, randomized trial. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2015;135(1):289‐98. - PMC - PubMed
Gibbons 2015 {published data only}
    1. Gibbons GW, Orgill DP, Serena TE, Novoung S, O'Connell JB, Li WW, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing the effects of noncontact, low‐frequency ultrasound to standard care in healing venous leg ulcers. Ostomy/Wound Management 2015;61(1):16‐29. - PubMed
Gibson 1995 {published data only}
    1. Gibson, B. A cost effectiveness comparison of two gels in the treatment of sloughy leg ulcers. Presented at the Symposium on Advanced Wound Care and Medical Research Forum on Wound Repair; 1995 April; San Diego, CA. www.umsinsihealth.com/Files/PDF/Granugel%20(Duoderm)%20vs%20Intrasite%20... (accessed 1 December 2017).
Gilligan 2014 {published data only}
    1. Gilligan AM, Waycaster C. Cost‐effectiveness of small intestinal submucosa extracellular matrix on wound closure in patients with difficult‐to‐heal wound of mixed arterial/venous and venous etiology. ISPOR 19th Annual International Meeting; 2014 May 31‐June 4; Montreal, Canada. 2014:A272‐3.
Gravante 2013 {published data only}
    1. Gravante G, Sorge R, Giordan N, Georgescu SR, Morariu SH, Stoicescu I, et al. Multicenter clinical trial on the performance and tolerability of the Hyaluronic acid‐collagenase ointment for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers: A preliminary pilot study. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2013;17(20):2721‐7. - PubMed
Groenewald 1980 {published data only}
    1. Groenewald JH. An evaluation of dextranomer as a cleansing agent in the treatment of the post‐phlebitic stasis ulcer. South African Medical Journal 1980;57(20):809‐15. - PubMed
Groenewald 1981 {published data only}
    1. Groenewald JH. The treatment of varicose stasis ulcers: a controlled trial. Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis 1981;70(28):1273‐8. - PubMed
Gronberg 2014 {published data only}
    1. Gronberg A, Mahlapuu M, Stahle M, Whately‐Smith C, Rollman O. Treatment with LL‐37 is safe and effective in enhancing healing of hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers: a randomized, placebo‐controlled clinical trial. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2014;22(5):613‐21. - PubMed
Grotewohl 1994 {published data only}
    1. Grotewohl JH. The phase‐orientated wound dressing of ulcus crusis venosum. Experience with the use of the new hydrogel Opragel. Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin 1994;70(9):351‐4.
Guarnera 2010 {published data only}
    1. Guarnera G, DeRosa A, Camerini R. The effect of thymosin treatment of venous ulcers. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2010;1194:207‐12. - PubMed
    1. Guarnera G, DeRosa A, Camerini R. Thymosin beta‐4 and venous ulcers: clinical remarks on a European prospective, randomized study on safety, tolerability, and enhancement on healing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2007;1112:407‐12. - PubMed
Handfield‐Jones 1988 {published data only}
    1. Handfield‐Jones SE, Grattan CE, Simpson RA, Kennedy CT. Comparison of a hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze in the treatment of venous ulcers. British Journal of Dermatology 1988;118(3):425‐7. - PubMed
Harding 2005 {published data only}
    1. Harding KG, Krieg T, Eming SA, Flour ML, Jawien A, Cencora A, et al. Efficacy and safety of the freeze‐dried cultured human keratinocyte lysate, LyphoDermTM 0.9%, in the treatment of hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2005;13(2):138‐47. - PubMed
Harding 2012 {published data only}
    1. Harding K, Gottrup F, Jawien A, Mikosinski J, Twardowska‐Saucha K, Kaczmarek S, et al. A prospective, multi‐centre, randomised, open label, parallel, comparative study to evaluate effects of AQUACEL Ag and Urgotul Silver dressing on healing of chronic venous leg ulcers. International Wound Journal 2012;9(3):285‐94. - PMC - PubMed
Harding 2013 {published data only}
    1. Harding K. An open randomised comparative study to evaluate the clinical and economic performance of two absorbent dressings in venous leg ulcers (VLU's). EWMA Journal 2013;13(Suppl 1):190.
Harvey 1985 {published data only}
    1. Harvey SG, Gibson JR. The effects on wound healing of three amino acids ‐ a comparison of two models. British Journal of Dermatology 1984;111(Suppl 27):171‐3. - PubMed
    1. Harvey SG, Gibson JR, Burke CA. L‐cysteine, glycine and dl‐threonine in the treatment of hypostatic leg ulceration: a placebo‐controlled study. Pharmatherapeutica 1985;4(4):227‐30. - PubMed
He 2008 {published data only}
    1. He Q, Wu G, Yu B, Zhang T, Wang W, Gu Q. A prospective study on wound‐healing hydrogel in treating chronic venous ulcer of lower extremities. Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi [Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery] 2008;22(3):311‐3. - PubMed
Hellgren 1983 {published data only}
    1. Hellgren L. Cleansing properties of stabilized trypsin and streptokinase‐streptodornase in necrotic leg ulcers. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1983;24(5):623‐8. - PubMed
Hill 2004 {published data only}
    1. Hill DP, Poore S, Wilson J, Robson MC, Cherry GW. Initial healing rates of venous ulcers: are they useful as predictors of healing?. American Journal of Surgery 2004;188(Suppl 1A):22‐5. - PubMed
Hillstrom 1988 {published data only}
    1. Hillstrom L. Iodosorb compared to standard treatment in chronic venous leg ulcers ‐ a multicenter study. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Supplementum 1988;544(Suppl 544):53‐6. - PubMed
Holloway 1989 {published data only}
    1. Holloway G, Johansen KH, Barnes RW, Pierce GE. Multicenter trial of cadexomer iodine to treat venous stasis ulcer. Western Journal of Medicine 1989;151(1):35‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Hornemann 1987 {published data only}
    1. Hornemann M, Raptis G. Therapy of varicose ulcer using crilanomer and dextranomer. Zeitschrift fur Hautkrankheiten 1987;62(1):41‐51. - PubMed
Humbert 2014 {published data only}
    1. Humbert P, Faivre B, Veran Y, Debure C, Truchetet F, Becherel PA, et al. Protease‐modulating polyacrylate‐based hydrogel stimulates wound bed preparation in venous leg ulcers ‐ a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2014;28(12):1742‐50. - PMC - PubMed
Hutchinson 1994 {published data only}
    1. Hutchinson JJ. A prospective clinical trial of wound dressings to investigate the rate of infection under occlusion. Third European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1993 October 19‐22; Harrogate, UK. 1994:93‐6.
Jasiel 1997a {published data only}
    1. Jasiel E, Nowak A, Gwiezdzinksi Z, Bowszyc J, Szarmach H, Blaszsyc M, et al. A randomized, controlled, parallel‐group clinical trial of a new polyurethane foam dressing (Lyofoam Extra) versus a calcium alginate dressing (Melonin) in the treatment of moderate to heavily exuding venous leg ulcers. Sixth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1996 October 1‐4; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 1997:78.
Jasiel 1997b {published data only}
    1. Jasiel E, Nowak A, Gwiezdzinksi Z, Bowszyc J, Szarmach H, Czabanowska J, et al. A randomized, controlled, parallel‐group clinical trial of a new debriding agent (Sterigel) versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of necrotic venous leg ulcers. Sixth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1996 October 1‐4; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 1997:81.
Jones 2003 {published data only}
    1. Jones V. Comparison of the new multilayer composite wound dressing Versiva with Allevyn hydrocellular for managing venous leg ulcers: results of an international multicentre randomised trial [Abstract].. 13th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2003 May 22‐24; Pisa, Italy. 2003:217.
    1. Jones V. Comparison of the new multilayer composite wound dressing Versiva with Tielle Plus for managing venous leg ulcers: results of an international multicentre randomised trial. 13th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2003 May 22‐24; Pisa, Italy. 2003:218.
Judy 2010 {published data only}
    1. Judy D, Burton C, Johnson J, Yates S. Silver impregnated dressings: Do they help chronic venous ulcers heal?. 68th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; 2010 March 5‐9; Miami, FL. 2010:AB150. [Poster P3701]
Jørgensen 2006 {published data only}
    1. Jørgensen B, Friis GJ, Gottrup F. Pain and quality of life for patients with venous leg ulcers: proof of concept of the efficacy of Biatain‐Ibu, a new pain reducing wound dressing. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2006;14(3):233‐9. - PubMed
Jørgensen 2008 {published data only}
    1. Jørgensen B, Sulcaite R, Vilkevicius G, Bech‐Thomsen N, Rimdeika R, Gottrup F. A randomised, controlled trial on safety and performance of a new foam dressing on venous leg ulcers. EWMA Journal 2008;8(2 (Suppl)):138.
Jørgensen 2009 {published data only}
    1. Jørgensen B, Polignano R, Mantovani M, Orsted H. Effects of a foam dressing with ibuprofen on wound pain from arterial leg ulcers and vasculitic ulcers. EWMA Journal 2009;9(2):193. [Abstract P4]
Kerihuel 2010 {published data only}
    1. Kerihuel JC. Effect of activated charcoal dressings on healing outcomes of chronic wounds. Journal of Wound Care 2010;19(5):208‐14. - PubMed
Kikta 1988 {published data only}
    1. Kikta MJ, Schuler JJ, Meyer JP, Durham JR, Eldrup‐Jorgensen J, Schwarcz TH, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of Unna's boots versus hydroactive dressing in the treatment of venous stasis ulcers. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1988;7(3):478‐83. - PubMed
Kirsner 2012 {published data only}
    1. Kirsner RS, Marston WA, Snyder RJ, Lee TD, Cargill DI, Slade HB. Spray‐applied cell therapy with human allogeneic fibroblasts and keratinocytes for the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers: a phase 2, multicentre, double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet 2012;380(9846):977‐85. - PubMed
    1. Kirsner RS, Marston WA, Snyder RJ, Lee TD, Cargill DI, Zhang Y, et al. Durability of healing from spray‐applied cell therapy with human allogeneic fibroblasts and keratinocytes for the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers: a 6‐month follow‐up. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2013;21(5):682‐7. - PubMed
    1. Lantis JC 2nd, Marston WA, Farber A, Kirsner RS, Zhang Y, Lee TD, et al. The influence of patient and wound variables on healing of venous leg ulcers in a randomized controlled trial of growth‐arrested allogeneic keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013;58(2):433‐9. - PubMed
    1. Marston W, Kirsner R, Snyder R, Lee T, Cargill I, Slade H. Variables affecting healing of venous leg ulcers in a randomized, vehicle‐controlled trial of topical cellular therapy. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2012;55(1):303.
Kirsner 2016a {published data only}
    1. Kirsner RS, Vanscheidt W, Keast DH, Lantis JC, Dove CR, Cazzell SM, et al. Phase 3 evaluation of HP802‐247 in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers [American trial report]. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2016;24(5):894‐903. - PubMed
Kirsner 2016b {published data only}
    1. Kirsner RS, Vanscheidt W, Keast DH, Lantis JC, Dove CR, Cazzell SM, et al. Phase 3 evaluation of HP802‐247 in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers [European trial report]. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2016;24(5):894‐903. - PubMed
Klemp 1986 {published data only}
    1. Klemp P, Ravnborg L, Staberg B. Pain reaction in patients with venous leg ulcers during treatment with Trypure. Ugeskrift for Laeger 1986;148(13):762‐3. - PubMed
Klostermann 1974 {published data only}
    1. Klostermann GF, Jakob H. Comparative testing of a new cream‐base against unguentum diachylon in ulcus cruris. Munchener Medizinische Wochenschrift 1974;116(23):1169‐70. - PubMed
Koksal 2003 {published data only}
    1. Koksal C, Bozkurt AK. Combination of hydrocolloid dressing and medical compression stocking versus Unna's boot for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Swiss Medical Weekly 2003;133(25‐26):364‐8. - PubMed
König 2005 {published data only}
    1. König M, Vanscheidt W, Augustin M, Kapp H. Enzymatic versus autolytic debridement of chronic leg ulcers: a prospective randomised trial. Journal of Wound Care 2005;14(7):320‐3. - PubMed
Kopera 2005 {published data only}
    1. Kopera D, Kokol R, Berger C, Haas J. Does the use of low‐level laser influence wound healing in chronic venous leg ulcers?. Journal of Wound Care 2005;14(8):391‐4. - PubMed
    1. Kopera D, Kokol R, Berger C, Haas J. Low level laser: does it influence wound healing in venous leg ulcers? A randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind study. British Journal of Dermatology 2005;152(6):1368‐70. - PubMed
Krasowski 2015 {published data only}
    1. Krasowski G, Jawien A, Tukiendorf A, Rybak Z, Junka A, Olejniczak‐Nowakowska M, et al. A comparison of an antibacterial sandwich dressing vs dressing containing silver. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2015;23(4):525‐30. - PubMed
Kucharzewski 2012 {published data only}
    1. Kucharzewski M, Misztal‐Knyra J, Wilemska‐Kucharzewska K, Bartoszewicz M, Kózka M. The impact of various types of dressings on bacterial flora in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. EWMA Journal 2012;12(2):108.
La Marca 1999 {published data only}
    1. Marca G, Pumilia G, Martino A. Effectiveness of mesoglycan topical treatment of leg ulcers in subjects with chronic venous insufficiency. Minerva Cardioangiologica 1999;47(9):315‐9. - PubMed
Lammoglia‐Ordiales 2012 {published data only}
    1. Lammoglia L, Contreras‐Ruiz J, Vega‐Memije ME. Effectiveness of MTC‐2G (Mimosa tenuiflora cortex extract) in venous leg ulcers treatment. 20th Annual Meeting of the Wound Healing Society SAWC/WHS Joint Meeting; 2010 April 17‐20; Orlando (FL). 2010:A25.
    1. Lammoglia‐Ordiales L, Vega‐Memije ME, Herrera‐Arellano A, Rivera‐Arce E, Agüero J, Vargas‐Martinez F, et al. A randomised comparative trial on the use of a hydrogel with tepescohuite extract ( Mimosa tenuiflora cortex extract‐2G) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. International Wound Journal 2012;9(4):412‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Larsen 1995 {published data only}
    1. Larsen AM, Ulrik D, Madsen SM. Randomised study on Comfeel: alginate dressing vs Kaltostat on exudating venous leg ulcers. Fifth Annual Meeting of the European Tissue Repair Society; 1995 August 30‐September 2; Padua, Italy. 1995:Poster.
Larsen 1997 {published data only}
    1. Larsen AM, Andersen KE, Berg BK. A comparative study on the effect and function of Comfeel Purilon versus IntraSite gel on leg ulcers. European Wound Management Association Conference; 1997 April 27‐29; Milan, Italy. 1997:44‐6.
Larsen 2005 {published data only}
    1. Larsen AM, Vogensen H, Haase L. Evaluation of a foam dressing with a new soft adherent layer. European Wound Management Association Conference; 2005 September 15‐17; Stuttgart, Germany. 2005:293.
Laudanska 1988 {published data only}
    1. Laudanska H, Gustavson B. In‐patient treatment of chronic varicose venous ulcers. A randomised controlled trial of Cadexomer Iodine versus standard dressings. Journal of International Medical Research 1988;16(6):428‐35. - PubMed
Lazareth 2008 {published data only}
    1. Lazareth I, Meaume S, Sigal Grinberg ML, Combemale P, Guyadec T, Zagnoli A, et al. The role of a silver releasing lipido‐colloid contact layer in venous leg ulcers presenting inflammatory signs suggesting heavy bacterial colonization: results of a randomized controlled study. Wounds 2008;20(6):158‐66. - PubMed
    1. Lazareth I, Meaume S, Sigal‐Grinberg ML, Combemale P, Guyadec T, Zagnoli A, et al. Efficacy of a silver lipidocolloid dressing on heavily colonised wounds: a republished RCT. Journal of Wound Care 2012;21(2):96‐102. - PubMed
Limová 1996 {published data only}
    1. Limová M. Evaluation of a new hydrocolloid dressing in the management of venous stasis ulcers. Fifth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1995 November 21‐24; Harrogate, UK. 1996:271.
Limová 2002 {published data only}
    1. Limová M, Troyer‐Caudle J. Controlled, randomized clinical trial of two hydrocolloid dressings in the management of venous insufficiency ulcers. Journal of Vascular Nursing 2002;20(1):22‐32. - PubMed
Limová 2003 {published data only}
    1. Limová M. Evaluation of two calcium alginate dressings in the management of venous ulcers. Ostomy/Wound management 2003;49(9):26‐30. - PubMed
Lindgren 1998 {published data only}
    1. Lindgren C, Marcusson JA, Toftgård R. Treatment of venous leg ulcers with cryopreserved cultured allogeneic keratinocytes: a prospective open controlled study. British Journal of Dermatology 1998;139(2):271‐5. - PubMed
Lindholm 1995 {published data only}
    1. Lindholm C. Leg ulcer treatment in hospital and primary care in Sweden: cost‐effective care and quality of life. Advances in Wound Care 1995;8(5):48‐50. - PubMed
Ljungberg 1998 {published data only}
    1. Ljungberg S. Dextranomer for treatment of venous leg ulcers: paste versus bead formulation. Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical and Experimental 1998;59(7):498‐502.
Lofferer 1982 {published data only}
    1. Lofferer O. Use of polymeric dextrans in cases of therapy‐resistant leg ulcers: a controlled study. Phlebologie und Proktologie 1982;11(3):303‐6.
Lopez 1998 {published data only}
    1. Lopez AP, Bello Y, Phillips TJ. A pilot study to test the effects of a radiant heat bandage on chronic venous ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 1998;6(3):A245.
Lundeberg 1990 {published data only}
    1. Lundeberg T, Nordström F, Brodda Jansen G, Eriksson SV, Kjartansson J, Samuelson UE. Pulsed ultrasound does not improve healing of venous ulcers. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1990;22(4):195‐7. - PubMed
Lundeberg 1991 {published data only}
    1. Lundeberg T, Malm M. Low‐power HeNe laser treatment of venous leg ulcers. Annals of Plastic Surgery 1991;27(6):537‐9. - PubMed
Maggio 2007 {published data only}
    1. Maggio G, Scalise A, Durante C. Improved health related activities of daily living for patients with wound pain treated with ibuprofen foam dressing. 17th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2007 May 2‐4; Glasgow, Scotland. 2007:173. [Poster 163]
Maggio 2012 {published data only}
    1. Maggio G, Armenio A, Ruccia F, Giglietto D, Pascone M, Ribatti D. A new protocol for the treatment of the chronic venous ulcers of the lower limb. Clinical and Experimental Medicine 2012;12(1):55‐60. - PubMed
Mansson 1997 {published data only}
    1. Mansson T. Effect of Iodosorb dressing, Duoderm E and Jelonet on symptomatic parameters in exudative venous leg ulcers. Fifth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1995 November 21‐24; Harrogate, UK. 1996:160‐2.
    1. Mansson T, Tenvall GR, Sundberg J. A cost analysis as part of a clinical comparative leg ulcer study of Iodosorb dressing, Duoderm E and Jelonet. New Approaches to the Management of Chronic Wounds 1997:142‐3.
Meaume 2005a {published data only}
    1. Meaume S, Ourabah Z, Cartier H, Granel‐Brocard F, Combemale P, Bressieux JM, et al. Evaluation of a lipidocolloid wound dressing in the local management of leg ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 2005;14(7):329‐34. - PubMed
    1. Meaume S, Senet P, Bressieux JM, Bohbot S, Bressieux JM. Efficacy and tolerance of wound dressings Urgotul and Duoderm E in the treatment of venous and mixed leg ulcers: results of randomised clinical study. European Wound Management Association Conference; 2005 September 15‐17; Stuttgart, Germany. 2005:293. 2005:271.
    1. Meaume S, Senet P, Bressieux JM, Bohbot, Coll S. Urgotul and Duoderm E in the treatment of venous or mixed leg ulcers: results of a randomised clinical study. Second World Union of Wound Healing Societies Meeting; 2004 July 8‐13; Paris, France. 2004:42‐3.
Meaume 2005c {published data only}
    1. Meaume S, Vallet D, Morere MN, Téot L. Evaluation of a silver‐releasing hydroalginate dressing in chronic wounds with signs of local infection. Journal of Wound Care 2005;14(9):411‐9. - PubMed
    1. Meaume S, Vallet D, Morere MN, Téot L. Evaluation of a silver‐releasing hydroalginate dressing in chronic wounds with signs of local infection. Zeitschrift fur Wundheilung 2006;11(5):236‐45. - PubMed
Meaume 2008 {published data only}
    1. Meaume S, Ourabah Z, Romanelli M, Manopulo R, Vathaire F, Salomon D, et al. Efficacy and tolerance of a hydrocolloid dressing containing hyaluronic acid for the treatment of leg ulcers of venous or mixed origin. Current Medical Research and Opinion 2008;24(10):2729‐39. - PubMed
    1. Meaume S, Senet P, Pannier M, Bohbot S. Efficacy and tolerance of a contact layer and hydrocolloid dressing in the treatment of venous and mixed leg ulcers: results of randomized clinical study. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing 2008;35(Suppl 3):S8.
Meaume 2014 {published data only}
    1. Meaume S, Dissemond J, Addala A, Vanscheidt W, Stücker M, Goerge T, et al. Evaluation of two fibrous wound dressings for the management of leg ulcers: results of a European randomised controlled trial (EARTH RCT). Journal of Wound Care 2014;23(3):105‐6. - PubMed
Mehtar 1988 {published data only}
    1. Mehtar S, Fox D. A double‐blind comparative study with Mupirocin vs placebo base in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers. British Journal of Clinical Practice 1988;42(8):324‐8. - PubMed
Miller 2010 {published data only}
    1. Karimi L, Miller C, Kapp S, Newall N, Lewin G, Carville K, et al. Client perceptions of two types of antimicrobial dressings and compressions bandaging. Wound Practice and Research 2010;18(3):124‐132.
    1. Miller C, Kapp S, Newall N, Lewin G, Karimi L, Carville K, et al. Predicting concordance with multilayer compression bandaging. Journal of Wound Care 2011;20(3):101‐6. - PubMed
    1. Miller CN, Carville K, Newall N, Kapp S, Lewin G, Karimi L, et al. Assessing bacterial burden in wounds: comparing clinical observation and wound swabs. International Wound Journal 2011;8(1):45‐55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller CN, Newall N, Kapp SE, Lewin G, Karimi L, Carville K, et al. A randomized‐controlled trial comparing cadexomer iodine and nanocrystalline silver on the healing of leg ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2010;18(4):359‐67. - PubMed
Milward 1991 {published data only}
    1. Milward P. Comparing treatments for leg ulcers. Nursing Times 1991;87(13):70. - PubMed
Moffatt 2014 {published data only}
    1. Moffatt CJ, Stanton J, Murray S, Doody V, Davis P J, Franks P J. A randomised trial to compare the performance of Oxyzyme and Iodozyme with standard care in the treatment of patients with venous and mixed venous/arterial ulceration. Wound Medicine 2014;6:1‐10.
Morimoto 2015 {published data only}
    1. Morimoto N, Kakudo N, Matsui M, Ogura T, Hara T, Suzuki K, et al. Exploratory clinical trial of combination wound therapy with a gelatin sheet and platelet‐rich plasma in patients with chronic skin ulcers: study protocol. BMJ 2015;5(5):e007733. - PMC - PubMed
Mosti 2010 {published data only}
    1. Mosti G, Mattaliano V, Conte R, Abel M. Promotion of healing, pain relief, tolerability and quality of life: results of a prospective, controlled, randomized comparison study with two wound dressings in out‐patients with non‐infected leg ulcers. EWMA Journal 2010;10(2):59. [Abstract 77]
Mosti 2015 {published data only}
    1. Mosti G, Magliaro A, Mattaliano V, Picerni P, Angelotti N. Comparative study of two antimicrobial dressings in infected leg ulcers: a pilot study. Journal of Wound Care 2015;24(3):121‐7. - PubMed
Mostow 2005 {published data only}
    1. Demling RH, Niezgoda JA, Haraway GD, Mostow EN. Small intestinal submucosa wound matrix and full‐thickness venous ulcers: preliminary results. Wounds 2004;16(1):18‐22.
    1. Hodde JP, Hiles MC, Sillings N, Metzger DW. Characterization of the local wound environment following treatment of chronic leg ulcers with SIS wound matrix: small intestinal submucosa. 19th Annual Symposium on Advanced Wound Care; 2006 April 30‐May 3; San Antonio (TX). 2006; Vol. 4:105‐6.
    1. Mostow EN, Haraway GD, Dalsing M, Hodde JP, King D, Oasis Venus Ulcer Study Group. Effectiveness of an extracellular matrix graft (OASIS Wound Matrix) in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2005;41(5):837‐43. - PubMed
Mudge 2014 {published data only}
    1. Mudge E, Price P, Harding K. A randomised controlled trial of larval therapy for the debridement of leg ulcers. EWMA Journal 2013;13(Suppl 1):79. - PubMed
    1. Mudge E, Price P, Neal W, Harding KG. A randomized controlled trial of larval therapy for the debridement of leg ulcers: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open, observer blind, parallel group study. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2014;22(1):43‐51. - PubMed
Mulder 1995 {published data only}
    1. Mulder G, Como A, Seeley J, Peak‐Andrews KA. A randomised clinical study to evaluate and compare the performance of Allevyn hydrocellular dressing and Kaltostat alginate dressing in the treatment of venous ulcers. European Wound Management Association Conference; 1994 September 6‐9; Copenhagen, Denmark. 1995:199.
    1. Mulder G, Jensen J, Seeley J. Use of hydrocellular dressing versus a calcium alginate in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Fifth Annual Meeting of the European Tissue Repair Society; 1995 August 30‐September 2; Padua, Italy. 1995:368.
Mulligan 1988 {published data only}
    1. Mulligan CM, Bragg AJ, O'Toole OB. A controlled comparative trial of Actisorb activated charcoal cloth dressing in the community. British Journal of Clinical Practice 1988;40:145‐8. - PubMed
Nagl 2003 {published data only}
    1. Nagl M, Nguyen VA, Gottardi W, Ulmer H, Höpfl R. Tolerability and efficacy of N‐chlorotaurine in comparison with chloramine T for the treatment of chronic leg ulcers with a purulent coating: a randomized phase II study. British Journal of Dermatology 2003;149(3):590‐7. - PubMed
Navratilova 2004 {published data only}
    1. Navratilova Z, Slonkova V, Semradova V, Adler J. Cryopreserved and lyophilized cultured epidermal allografts in the treatment of leg ulcers: a pilot study. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2004;18(2):173‐9. - PubMed
Neander 2003 {published data only}
    1. Neander K, Hesse F. Wound care. The protective effects on wound edges of a new preparation. Nursing Times 2004;100(4):61‐3. - PubMed
    1. Neander KD, Hesse F. The protective effects of a new preparation on wound edges. Journal of Wound Care 2003;12(10):369‐71. - PubMed
Nelson 2011 {published data only}
    1. Chuang LH, Soares MO, Watson JM, Bland JM, Cullum N, Iglesias C, et al. Economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound therapy for hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers. British Journal of Surgery 2011;98(8):1099‐106. - PubMed
    1. Nelson A, Watson JM, Kang'ombe AR, Soares M, Chuang LH, Worthy G, et al. Venus III: a randomised controlled trial of ultrasound for “hard to heal” venous leg ulcers. EWMA Journal 2011;11(Suppl 2):83.
    1. Watson JM, Kang'ombe AR, Soares M O, Chuang LH, Worthy G, Bland JM, et al. Use of weekly, low dose, high frequency ultrasound for hard to heal venous leg ulcers: the VenUS III randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2011;342(7797):d1092. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson JM, Kang'ombe AR, Soares M, Chuang LH, Worthy G, Bland JM, et al. VenUS III: a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound for 'hard to heal' venous leg ulcers. Phlebology 2011;26(6):260.
Nieves 2015 {published data only}
    1. Nieves E, Ramirez M, Fajardo E, Camacho E, Giraldo O. Venous ulcer treatment with sclerofoam versus a conventional treatment: randomized prospective clinical trial. Angiologia 2015;67(1):32‐7.
Nowak 1996 {published data only}
    1. Nowak A, Gwiezdzinski Z, Bowszyc J, Szarmach H, Czabanowska J, Harding EF. A randomized controlled parallel‐group clinical trial of a new debriding agent in the treatment of necrotic venous ulcers. Fifth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1995 November 21‐24; Harrogate, UK. 1996:190‐3.
Nyfors 1982 {published data only}
    1. Nyfors A, Helland S, Solberg V. Synthaderm in the treatment of leg ulcers. A prospective controlled study. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 1982;102(7):424‐5. - PubMed
Olyaie 2013 {published data only}
    1. Olyaie M, Rad FS, Elahifar MA, Garkaz A, Mahsa G. High‐frequency and noncontact low‐frequency ultrasound therapy for venous leg ulcer treatment: a randomized, controlled study. Ostomy/Wound management 2013;59(8):14‐20. - PubMed
Omar 2004 {published data only}
    1. Omar AA, Mavor AI, Jones AM, Homer‐Vanniasinkam S. Treatment of venous leg ulcers with Dermagraft. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2004;27(6):666‐72. - PubMed
Ortonne 1996 {published data only}
    1. Ortonne JP. A controlled study of the activity of hyaluronic acid in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Journal of Dermatological Treatment 1996;7(2):75‐81.
Osman 2014 {published data only}
    1. Osman AO, Ansary MM, Metwally HG, Gad AA, Al‐Inany HG, Elbadawy AH. A hope for healing using amniotic membrane and stem cells. Clinical Chemistry 2014;60(10 (Suppl 1)):S31.
Pardes 1993 {published data only}
    1. Pardes JB, Carson PA, Eaglstein WH, Falanga V. Mupirocin treatment of exudative venous ulcers. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1993;29(3):497‐8. - PubMed
Passarini 1982 {published data only}
    1. Passarini B, Tosti A, Fanti PA, Varotti C. Effect of hyaluronic acid on the reparative process of non‐healing ulcers. Comparative study. Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 1982;117(3):XXVII‐XXX. - PubMed
Peschen 1997 {published data only}
    1. Peschen M, Vanscheidt W. Low frequency ultrasound of chronic venous leg ulcers as part of an out‐patient treatment. Fifth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1995 November 21‐24; Harrogate, UK. 1996:271.
    1. Peschen M, Weichenthal M, Schöpf E, Vanscheidt W. Low‐frequency ultrasound treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers in an outpatient therapy. Acta Dermato‐Venereologica 1997;77(4):311‐4. - PubMed
Pessenhofer 1989 {published data only}
    1. Pessenhofer H, Stangl M. The effect on wound healing of venous leg ulcers of a two‐layered polyurethane foam wound dressing. Arzneimittel‐Forschung 1989;39(9):1173‐7. - PubMed
Pessenhofer 1992 {published data only}
    1. Pessenhofer H, Stangl M. The effect of a two‐layered polyurethane foam wound dressing on the healing of venous leg ulcers. Journal of Tissue Viability 1992;2(57):57‐61.
Petres 1994 {published data only}
    1. Petres J, Rompel R, Nölting S, Payne J. Alginates versus hydrocolloids in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Third European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1993 October 1921‐22; Harrogate, UK. 1994:165.
Planinsek 2007a {published data only}
    1. Planinsek TR. Effectiveness of non‐alcohol film forming skin protector on the skins isles inside the ulcers and the healing rate of venous leg ulcers: randomized clinical study. EWMA Journal 2007;7(1):23‐5.
Planinsek 2007b {published data only}
    1. Planinsek TR. Comparative effects of honey based and silver/ charcoal based dressings on the healing of venous leg ulcers: a randomized clinical study. 17th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2007 May 2‐4; Glasgow, Scotland. 2007:54.
Polignano 2001 {published data only}
    1. Polignano R, Turrini P, Andriessen A. The effect on microcirculation in leg ulcers comparing traditional vs MWH dressings: a pilot study. 11th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2001 May 17‐19; Dublin, Ireland. 2001:79.
    1. Polignano R, Turrini P, Andriessen A. The effect on microcirculation in leg ulcers comparing traditional vs MWH dressings: a pilot study. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2001;9(5):402.
Poskitt 1987 {published data only}
    1. Poskitt KR, James AH, Lloyd‐Davies ER, Walton J, McCollum C, Lloyd Davies ER. Pinch skin grafting or porcine dermis in venous ulcers: a randomised clinical trial. British Medical Journal 1987;294(6573):674‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Price 2004 {published data only}
    1. Price P, Contreet Study Group. Health‐related quality of life aspects after treatment with a foam dressing and a silver containing foam dressing in chronic leg ulcers. Second World Union of Wound Healing Societies Meeting; 2004 July 8‐13; Paris, France. 2004:161.
Prins 2000 {published data only}
    1. Prins C. Autohemotherapy for the treatment of leg ulcers: a randomized, prospective study. Dermatology 2000;201:91.
Purcell 2017 {published data only}
    1. Purcell A, Buckley T, Fethney J, King J, Moyle W, Marshall AP. The effectiveness of EMLA as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers: effects on wound healing and health‐related quality of life. International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds 2017;16(3):163‐72. - PubMed
    1. Purcell A, Buckley T, Fethney J, King J, Moyle W, Marshall AP. TheeEffectiveness of EMLA as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2017;30(8):354‐63. - PubMed
Rainey 1993 {published data only}
    1. Rainey J. A comparison of two dressings in the treatment of heavily exuding leg ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 1993;2(4):199‐200. - PubMed
Rainey 1996 {published data only}
    1. Rainey J. Comparing dressings. Journal of Community Nursing 1996;10(1):16‐7.
Raposio 2018 {published data only}
    1. Raposio E, Bertozzi N, Simonacci F, Grieco MP. Therapeutic effects of a pulsed electromagnetic device in chronic cutaneous ulcers of the lower limbs. Wound Medicine 2018;20:18‐20.
Rivera‐Arce 2007 {published data only}
    1. Rivera‐Arce E, Chávez‐Soto MA, Herrera‐Arellano A, Arzate S, Agüero J, Feria‐Romero IA, et al. Therapeutic effectiveness of a Mimosa tenuiflora cortex extract in venous leg ulceration treatment. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2007;109(3):523‐8. - PubMed
Robinson 1993 {published data only}
    1. Robinson BJ. Prospective study of cost benefit and other criteria when using hydrocolloid dressings in the community management oc chronic venous leg ulcers. Second European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1992 October 20‐23; Harrogate, UK. 1993:211.
Robinson 1998 {published data only}
    1. Robinson C, Santilli SM. Warm‐up active wound therapy: a novel approach to the management of chronic venous stasis ulcers. Journal of Vascular Nursing 1998;16(2):38‐42. - PubMed
    1. Santilli SM, Robinson C, Vosskuhler RJ. Warm‐up active wound therapy: a novel approach to the outpatient treatment of chronic venous stasis ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 1998;6(5):A479. - PubMed
Roldan 2009 {published data only}
    1. Roldan A, Cuervo F. Efficiacy of a polyhexanide/betaine wound gel in the treatment of hard to heal wounds. EWMA Journal 2009;9(2):129. [Abstract P62]
Romanelli 2006 {published data only}
    1. Romanelli M, Dini V, Bertone M. Histological evaluation of venous leg ulcers treated with amelogenin. EWMA Journal 2011;11(Suppl 2):224.
    1. Romanelli M, Ellervee T, Jarve H, Kaha E. Amelogenins (Xelma) in hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers, an open regime investigation. 16th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2006 May 18‐20; Prague, Czech Republic. 2006:143.
    1. Romanelli M, Vowden P, Price P. An open, randomised, comparative, parallel group, multi‐centre clinical trial of amelogenin extracellular matrix therapy in the treatment of hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers: follow‐up data. 3rd Congress of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies Meeting; 2008 June 4‐8; Toronto, Canada. 2008:OR100.
Romanelli 2008 {published data only}
    1. Romanelli M, Dini V, Barbanerera S, Bertone MS, Brilli A, Lorenzo A. Improvement of treatment in patients with venous leg ulcers by a new pain‐reducing wound dressing with hydrobalance. EWMA Journal 2008;8(Suppl 2):286.
Romanelli 2009 {published data only}
    1. Romanelli M, Dini V, Polignano R, Bonadeo P, Maggio G. Ibuprofen slow‐release foam dressing reduces wound pain in painful exuding wounds: preliminary findings from an international real‐life study. Journal of Dermatological Treatment 2009;20(1):19‐26. - PubMed
    1. Romanelli M, Fogh C, Kusch I. Effects of a foam dressing with ibuprofen on wound pain from venous leg ulcers and mixed venous arterial leg ulcers. EWMA Journal 2009;9(2):194. [Abstract P5]
Romanelli 2011 {published data only}
    1. Romanelli M, Dini V, Barbanera S, Tonfoni V. Exudate management of hard to heal venous leg ulcer with a fiber dressing. EWMA Journal 2011;11(Suppl 2):190.
Romanelli 2015 {published data only}
    1. Romanelli M, Macchia M, Panduri S, Paggi B, Saponati G, Dini V. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a medical device in various forms containing Triticum vulgare for the treatment of venous leg ulcers: a randomized pilot study. Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015;9:2787‐92. - PMC - PubMed
Rucigaj 2007 {published data only}
    1. Rucigaj TP. Effectiveness of non‐alcohol film forming skin protector on the skins isles inside the ulcers and the healing rate of venous leg ulcers: randomized clinical study. EWMA Journal 2007;7(1):23‐5 3.
Rundle 1981 {published data only}
    1. Rundle JS, Elton RA, Cameron SH, Watson N, Gunn AA, Ruckley CV. Porcine dermis in varicose ulcers ‐ a clinical trial. VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten. Journal for Vascular Diseases 1981;10(3):246‐8. - PubMed
Sabolinski 1996 {published data only}
    1. Sabolinski ML, Alvarez O, Auletta M, Mulder G, Parenteau NL. Cultured skin as a 'smart material' for healing wounds: experience in venous ulcers. Biomaterials 1996;17(3):311‐20. - PubMed
Sánchez‐Vázquez 2008 {published data only}
    1. Sánchez‐Vázquez R, Briseño‐Rodríguez G, Cardona‐Muñoz EG, Gálvez‐Gastélum FJ, Totsuka‐Sutto SE, Garcia‐Benavides L. Isosorbide dinitrate spray as therapeutic strategy for treatment of chronic venous ulcers. Angiology 2008;59(1):64‐71. - PubMed
Santamato 2012 {published data only}
    1. Santamato A, Panza F, Fortunato F, Portincasa A, Frisardi V, Cassatella G, et al. Effectiveness of the frequency rhythmic electrical modulation system for the treatment of chronic and painful venous leg ulcers in older adults. Rejuvenation Research 2012;15(3):281‐7. - PubMed
Scalise 2017 {published data only}
    1. Scalise A, Campitiello F, Della Corte A, Longobardi P, Salvo M. Tartaglione C, et al. Enzymatic debridement: is HA‐collagenase the right synergy? Randomized double‐blind controlled clinical trial in venous leg ulcers. European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences 2017;21(6):1421‐31. - PubMed
Schmutz 1997 {published data only}
    1. Schmutz JL. Comparison of the new hydrofibre dressing Aquacel and a conventional dressing for the treatment of leg ulcers. Sixth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1996 October 1‐4; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 1997:88.
Schmutz 2008 {published data only}
    1. Dompmartin A, Schmutz JL, Collier M, Smith J, Bohbot S. Management of venous leg ulcers with two active wound dressings. Protocol of a randomized clinical trial. 17th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2007 May 2‐4; Glasgow, Scotland. 2007:55.
    1. Meaume S, Dompmartin A, Lok C, Lazareth I, Sigal M, Truchetet F, et al. CHALLENGE Study Group. Quality of life in patients with leg ulcers: results from CHALLENGE, a double‐blind randomised controlled trial. Journal of Wound Care 2017;26(7):368‐79. - PubMed
    1. Meaume S, Dompmartin A, Schmutz JL, Ourabah Z, Thirion V, Thirion V, et al. Management of venous leg ulcers with two active wound dressings. Results of a randomized clinical trial. 18th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2008 May 14‐16; Lisbon, Portugal. 2008, issue Suppl 2:38. [Abstract 38]
    1. Meaume S, Schmutz JL, Dompmartin A, Fays S, Ourabah Z, Thirion V, et al. Management of venous leg ulcers with two active wound dressings. Results of a randomized clinical trial. Third Congress of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies Meeting; 2008 June 4‐8; Toronto, Canada.. 2008:OR047.
    1. Schmutz JL, Meaume S, Fays S, Ourabah Z, Guillot B, Thirion V, et al. Evaluation of the nano‐oligosaccharide factor lipido‐colloid matrix in the local management of venous leg ulcers: results of a randomised, controlled trial. International Wound Journal 2008;5(2):172‐182. - PMC - PubMed
Serena 2011 {published data only}
    1. Serena T, Bannan S, Data J, Singh M, Phillips A, Johns T, et al. Acceleration of venous ulcer healing using a topical connexin43 antisense compound: Phase 2 results. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2011;19(2):A50.
    1. Serena T, Bannan S, Singh M, Phillips A, Johns T, Schmidt E, et al. Acceleration of venous ulcer healing using a topical connexin43 antisense compound: phase 2 results. EWMA Journal 2011;11(2):84.
Serena 2014 {published data only}
    1. Serena TE, Carter MJ, Le LT, Sabo MJ, Dimarco DT, Lullove E, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allografts and multilayer compression therapy vs. multilayer compression therapy alone in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2014;22(6):668‐93. - PubMed
    1. Serena TE, Yaakov R, DiMarco D, Le L, Taffe E, Donaldson M, et al. Dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane treatment of venous leg ulcers: correlation between 4‐week and 24‐week outcomes. Wound Medicine 2015;24(11):530‐4. - PubMed
Serra 2010 {published data only}
    1. Serra N, Palomar F, Fornes B, Capillas R, Berenguer M, Aranda J, et al. Effectiveness of the association of multilayer compression therapy and periwound protection with Cavilon (no sting barrier film) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Gerokomos 2010;21(3):124‐30.
Sibbald 2005 {published data only}
    1. Sibbald G, Brassard A, Kay D, Gulliver W, Hull P, Giard F, et al. Evaluation of a new fibronectin based dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. European Wound Management Association Conference; 2005 September 15‐17; Stuttgart, Germany. 2005:293. 2005:91.
Sibbald 2007 {published data only}
    1. Sibbald RG, Coutts P, Fierheller M, Woo K. A pilot (real‐life) randomised clinical evaluation of a pain‐relieving foam dressing: (Ibuprofen‐foam versus local best practice). International Wound Journal 2007;4(Suppl 1):16‐23. - PMC - PubMed
Sibbald 2011 {published data only}
    1. Sibbald RG, Coutts P, Woo KY. Reduction of bacterial burden and pain in chronic wounds using a new polyhexamethylene biguanide antimicrobial foam dressing‐clinical trial results. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2011;24(2):78‐84. - PubMed
Siqueira 2014 {published data only}
    1. Siqueira CP, Paula Ramos S, Gobbi CA, Shigaki L, Kashimoto RK, Venancio EJ, et al. Effects of weekly LED therapy at 625 nm on the treatment of chronic lower ulcers. Lasers in Medical Science 2014;30(1):367‐73. - PubMed
Skog 1983 {published data only}
    1. Skog E, Arnesjö B, Troëng T, Gjöres JE, Bergljung L, Gundersen J, et al. A randomized trial comparing cadexomer iodine and standard treatment in the out‐patient management of chronic venous ulcers. British Journal of Dermatology 1983;109(1):77‐83. - PubMed
Smeets 2008 {published data only}
    1. Smeets R, Ulrich D, Unglaub F, Wöltje M, Pallua N. Effect of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen matrix on proteases in wound exudate of patients with chronic venous ulceration. International Wound Journal 2008;5(2):195‐203. - PMC - PubMed
Smith‐Strom 2006 {published data only}
    1. Smith‐Strom H. Comparison of healing and costs with two different treatments. A randomized controlled study of patient with leg ulcers, treated in the primary health care. Vard i Norden 2006;26(2):4‐9.
Soares 2009 {published data only}
    1. Soares MO, Iglesias CP, Bland JM, Cullum N, Dumville JC, Nelson EA, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of larval therapy for leg ulcers. BMJ 2009;338(7702):b825. - PMC - PubMed
Sparholt 2002 {published data only}
    1. Sparholt SH, Wilhelmsen F. Outcome evaluation of two hydrogels. Ostomy/Wound management 2002;48(4):74.
Sridhar 2017 {published data only}
    1. Sridhar S, Nanjappa N. Microbiological and clinical response of superoxidized solution versus povidone iodine in the management of lower limb ulcers. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and pharmacology 2017;7(10):1074‐80.
Sriram 2014 {published data only}
    1. Sriram S, Kavitha MM, Tamilselvam TN, Euphrasia Latha J, Rajeswari S. Role and efficacy of platelet rich plasma (PRP) in chronic non healing resistant vasculitic ulcers. Indian Journal of Rheumatology 2014;9((5 Supplement)):S1‐2.
Sriram 2015 {published data only}
    1. Sriram S. Role and efficacy of autologous platelet rich plasma in chronic resistant non healing vasculitic ulcers. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2015;74:1120. - PubMed
Stiller 1992 {published data only}
    1. Stiller MJ, Pak GH, Shupack JL, Thaler S, Kenny C, Jondreau L. A portable pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) device to enhance healing of recalcitrant venous ulcers: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial. British Journal of Dermatology 1992;127(2):147‐54. - PubMed
Stone 2016a {published data only}
    1. Stone RC, Stojadinovic O, Rosa AM, Sawaya A, Ramirez H, Badiavas EV, et al. In vivo mechanisms by which a bioengineered living cell construct stimulates healing of chronic ulcers: Activation, inflammation and remodeling. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2016;136(5 (Suppl 1)):S133.
Stone 2016b {published data only}
    1. Stone RC, Stojadinovic O, Sawaya AP, Rosa AM, Badiavas E, Blumenberg M. Treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers with a bioengineered living cell construct induces metallothioneins and MMP8 to resolve matrix fibrosis and reactivates a healthy remodeling response. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2016; Vol. 24 (2):A25.
Taradaj 2008 {published data only}
    1. Taradaj J, Franek A, Brzezinska Wcislo L, Cierpka L, Dolibog P, Chmielewska D, et al. The use of therapeutic ultrasound in venous leg ulcers: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Phlebology 2008;23(4):178‐183. - PubMed
Teepe 1993 {published data only}
    1. Teepe RG, Roseeuw DI, Hermans J, Koebrugge EJ, Altena T, Coninck A, et al. Randomized trial comparing cryopreserved cultured epidermal allografts with hydrocolloid dressings in healing chronic venous ulcers. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1993;29(6):982‐8. - PubMed
Texier 1980 {published data only}
    1. Texier L, Geniaux M, Meraud JP, Delaunay MM. Clinical trial of Debrisan in venous ulcer of the leg. Bordeaux Medical 1980;13(17):859‐60.
Thomas 1997a {published data only}
    1. Thomas S, Banks V, Fear M, Hagelstein S, Bale S, Harding K. A study to compare two film dressings used as secondary dressings. Journal of Wound Care 1997;6(7):333‐6. - PubMed
Vanscheidt 2004 {published data only}
    1. Vanscheidt W, Sibbald RG, Eager CA. Comparing a foam composite to a hydrocellular foam dressing in the management of venous leg ulcers: a controlled clinical study. Ostomy/Wound Management 2004;50(11):42‐48 5. - PubMed
Vanscheidt 2007 {published data only}
    1. Vanscheidt W, Ukat A, Horak V, Brüning H, Hunyadi J, Pavlicek R, et al. Treatment of recalcitrant venous leg ulcers with autologous keratinocytes in fibrin sealant: A multinational randomized controlled clinical trial. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2007;15(3):308‐15. - PubMed
Vas 2008 {published data only}
    1. Vas J, Modesto M, Mendez C, Perea‐Milla E, Aguilar I, Carrasco‐Lozano JM, et al. Effectiveness of acupuncture, special dressings and simple, low‐adherence dressings for healing venous leg ulcers in primary healthcare: Study protocol for a cluster‐randomized open‐labeled trial. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2008;8:29. - PMC - PubMed
Veraart 1994a {published data only}
    1. Veraart J, Neumann HA, Hulsmans RF, Broek MJ. Interim results of a comparative study on the characteristics of comfeel leg ulcer dressing in terms of healing, effects on periulcer skin and patient comfort. Wound Repair and Regeneration 1994;2(3):203.
    1. Veraart J, Neumann MH, Hulsmans R, Broek MJ. Interim results of a comparative study on the characteristics of comfeel leg ulcer dressing in terms of healing, effects on periulcer skin and patient comfort. First Joint Meeting of the Wound Healing Society and the European Tissue Repair Society; 1993 August; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 1993:92.
    1. Veraart JC, Neumann HA, Hulsmans RF, Broek MB. A comparative study on the characteristics of Comfeel Extra Absorbing Dressing in terms of healing, effects on periulcer skin, and patient comfort in care of leg ulcers. Fourth European Tissue Repair Society Meeting; 1994 August 25‐28; Oxford, UK. Oxford: ETRS, 1994:279. 1994:279.
Vitse 2017 {published data only}
    1. Vitse J, Bekara F, Byun S, Herlin C, Teot, L. A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled randomized evaluation of the effect of low‐level laser therapy on venous leg ulcers. International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds 2017;16(1):29‐35. - PubMed
Vowden 2007 {published data only}
    1. Romanelli M, Kaha E, Stege H, Wnorowski JW, Vowden P, Majamaa H, et al. Effect of amelogenin extracellular matrix protein and compression on hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers: follow‐up data. Journal of Wound Care 2008;17(1):17‐8. - PubMed
    1. Vowden P, Romanelli M. Effect of amelogenin matrix protein solution as add‐on treatment to compression in hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers: A randomised controlled trial. 17th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2007 May 2‐4; Glasgow, Scotland. 2007:54.
    1. Vowden P, Romanelli M, Peter R, Bostrom A, Josefsson A, Stege H. The effect of amelogenins (XelmaTM) on hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2006;14(3):240‐6. - PubMed
    1. Vowden P, Romanelli M, Price P. Effect of amelogenin extracellular matrix protein and compression on hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers. Journal of Wound Care 2007;16(5):189‐95. - PubMed
Vuerstaek 2006 {published data only}
    1. Vuerstaek JD, Vainas T, Wuite J, Nelemans P, Neumann MHA, Veraart J. State‐of‐the‐art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum‐assisted closure (VAC) with modern wound dressings. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006;44(5):1029‐38. - PubMed
Wayman 2000 {published data only}
    1. Wayman J, Nirojogi Walker A, Sowinski A, Walker MA. The cost effectiveness of larval therapy in venous ulcers. Journal of Tissue Viability 2000;10(3):91‐4. - PubMed
    1. Wayman J, Walker A, Sowinski A, Walker MA. Larval debridement therapy: a cost‐effective alternative to hydrogel in necrotic venous ulcers: a randomized trial. British Journal of Surgery 2000;87:507.
Weiss 1996 {published data only}
    1. Weiss RA, Weiss MA, Ford RW. Randomized comparative study of cutinova foam and allevyn with Jobst UlcerCare stockings for the treatment of venous stasis ulcers. Phlebology 1996;11(Suppl 1):S14‐16.
Werner‐Schlenzka 1994 {published data only}
    1. Werner‐Schlenzka H, Lehnert W. Topical treatment of venous leg ulcers with a prostacyclin hydrogel: a double blind trial. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids 1994;51(3):203‐6. - PubMed
Westh 1998 {published data only}
    1. Westh H, Warburg FE, Madsen SM, Larsen SO, Danielsen L. Cellulitis in venous leg ulcers treated with a hydrocolloid dressing. Phlebology 1998;13(2):68‐72.
Wieman 2003 {published data only}
    1. Wieman TJ. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human platelet‐derived growth factor‐BB (becaplermin) in patients with chronic venous ulcers: a pilot study. Wounds 2003;15(8):257‐64.
Wild 2010 {published data only}
    1. Wild T, Eberlein T, Andriessen A. Wound cleansing efficacy of two cellulose‐based dressings. Wounds UK 2010;6(3):14‐21.
Wong 2006 {published data only}
    1. Wong IK, Lee DT, Thompson DR. Modern wound care and compression: a randomized controlled study for the comparison of modern wound management only or in combination either with short or long stretch compression bandages in the treatment of venous ulcers. Vasomed 2006;18(4):149‐50.
Woo 2009 {published data only}
    1. Woo KY, Coutts PM, Price P, Harding K, Sibbald RG. A randomized crossover investigation of pain at dressing change comparing 2 foam dressings. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2009;22(7):304‐10. - PubMed
Woo 2010 {published data only}
    1. Woo K, Sibbald G, Coutts P. Reduction of infection and pain in chronic wounds using a new antimicrobial foam dressing. EWMA Journal 2010;10(2):59. [Abstract 78] - PubMed
Wunderlich 1991 {published data only}
    1. Wunderlich U, Orfanos CE. Treatment of venous ulcer cruris with dry wound dressings. Phase overlapping use of silver impregnated activated charcoal xero‐dressing. Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und Verwandte Gebiete 1991;42(7):446‐50. - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Alvarez 2017 {published data only}
    1. Alvarez OM, Makowitz L, Patel M. Venous ulcers treated with a hyaluronic acid extracellular matrix and compression therapy: interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Wounds‐A Compendium of Clinical Research & Practice 2017;29(7):E51‐4. - PubMed
Belcaro 2011 {published data only}
    1. Belcaro G, Cesarone MR, Errichi BM, Ricci A, Antelman P, Dugall M, et al. Silver oxide ointment wound dressing in venous ulcerations: home, self‐management. Panminerva Medica 2011;53(3 (Suppl 1)):29‐33. - PubMed
    1. Belcaro G, Cesarone MR, Errichi BM, Ricci A, Dugall M, Pellegrini L, et al. Venous and diabetic ulcerations: management with topical multivalent silver oxide ointment. Panminerva Medica 2010;52(2 (Suppl 1)):37‐42. - PubMed
Cavalcanti 2017 {published data only}
    1. Cavalcanti LM. Pinto FC, Oliveira GM, Lima SV, Aguiar JL, Lins EM. Efficacy of bacterial cellulose membrane for the treatment of lower limbs chronic varicose ulcers: a randomized and controlled trial. [Eficácia da membrana de celulose bacteriana no tratamento de úlceras venosas de membros inferiores: estudo randomizado e controlado]. Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes 2017;44(1):72‐80. - PubMed
Colenci 2016 {published data only}
    1. Colenci R, Jacinto, JS, Miot HA, Marques ME, Schmitt JV, Abbade LP. Biomembrane of hemicellulose dressing versus collagenase in the treatment of chronic venous ulcers: randomized clinical trial, open and controlled study. Wound Repair and Regeneration. Conference: 28th Annual Meeting of the Wound Healing Society, sawc‐spring/whs joint meeting.. 2016; Vol. 24 (2):A5.
Cullen 2017 {published data only}
    1. Cullen BM, Serena TE, Gibson MC, Snyder RJ, Hanft JR, Yaakov RA. Randomized controlled trial comparing collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose/silver to standard of care in the management of venous leg ulcers. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2017;30(10):464‐8. - PubMed
Glukhov 2017 {published data only}
    1. Glukhov AA, Aralova MV. The study of the effectiveness of the drug combination of collagen and platelet‐rich plasma for the regional treatment of venous ulcers. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences 2017;8(2):2258‐63.
Moreno‐Eutimio 2017 {published data only}
    1. Moreno‐Eutimio MA, Moreno J, Cueto‐Garcia J. Effect of a polymer polysaccharide with zinc oxide in the reduction of the ulcer size in chronic venous ulcers. Revista Mexicana de Angiologia 2016;44(2):67‐71.
Oliveira 2017 {published data only}
    1. Oliveira MG, Abbade LP, Miot HA, Ferreira RR, Deffune E. Pilot study of homologous platelet gel in venous ulcers. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia 2017;92(4):499‐504. - PMC - PubMed
Polignano 2010 {published data only}
    1. Polignano R, Terriaca P, Pavanelli A, Forma O, Ponti I, Sparavigna A. Evaluation of the efficacy of a cream with purified omental lipids (P.O.L.) in the management of peri‐lesional skin in chronic vascular ulcers. Journal of Plastic Dermatology 2010;6(3):235‐44.
Robinson 1988 {published data only}
    1. Robinson BJ. Randomized comparative trial of Duoderm vs Viscopaste PB7 bandage in the management of venous leg ulceration and cost to the community.. Beyond Occlusion: wound care proceedings. International Congress and Symposium Series, Royal Society of Medicine, London. (1988); Vol. 136:101‐4.
Somani 2017 {published data only}
    1. Somani A, Rai R. Comparison of efficacy of autologous platelet‐rich fibrin versus saline dressing in chronic venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Cutaneous and Aaesthetic Surgery 2017;10(1):8‐12. - PMC - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

Jull 2018 {published data only}
    1. Jull A, Wadham A, Bullen C, Parag V, Waters J. Wool‐derived keratin dressings versus usual care dressings for treatment of slow‐healing venous leg ulceration: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (Keratin4VLU). BMJ Open 2018;8(2):e020319.. - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

AHRQ 2013
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), US Department of Health. Chronic venous ulcers: a comparative effectiveness review of treatment modalities. December 2013. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK179151/ (accessed 9 November 2016). - PubMed
Ashby 2014
    1. Ashby RL, Gabe R, Ali S, Adderly U. Clinical and cost‐effectiveness of compression hosiery versus compression bandages in treatment of venous leg ulcers (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV, VenUS IV): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014;383:871‐9. - PubMed
Augustin 2012
    1. Augustin M, Brocatti LK, Rustenbach SJ, Schafer I, Herberger K. Cost‐of‐illness of leg ulcers in the community. International Wound Journal 2012;11(3):283‐92. - PMC - PubMed
BNF 2016
    1. British Medical Association, British Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National Formulary (BNF): wound management products and elasticated garments. www.medicinescomplete.com/mc/bnf/current/PHP101071‐wound‐management‐prod.... London: British Medical Association, (accessed 9 November 2016).
Bouza 2005
    1. Bouza C, Munoz A, Amate JM. Efficacy of modern dressings in the treatment of leg ulcers: a systematic review. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2005;13(3):218‐29. - PubMed
Bradley 1999
    1. Bradley M, Cullum N, Nelson EA, Petticrew M, Sheldon T, Torgerson D. Systematic reviews of wound care management: (2) dressings and topical agents used in the healing of chronic wounds. Health Technology Assessment 1999;3(17 (part 2)):1‐35. - PubMed
Briggs 2012
    1. Briggs M, Nelson EA, Martyn‐St James M. Topical agents or dressings for pain in venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001177.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Caldwell 2005
    1. Caldwell DM, Ades A, Higgins J. Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence as well. BMJ 2005;331(7521):897‐900. - PMC - PubMed
Caldwell 2014
    1. Caldwell DM. An overview of conducting systematic reviews with network meta‐analysis. Systematic Reviews 2014;3:109. - PMC - PubMed
Callam 1987b
    1. Callam MJ, Harper DR, Dale JJ, Ruckley CV. Chronic ulcer of the leg: clinical history. BMJ 1987;294(6584):1389‐91. - PMC - PubMed
Cardinal 2009
    1. Cardinal M, Eisenbud DE, Armstrong DG, Zelen C, Driver V, Attinger C, et al. Serial surgical debridement: a retrospective study on clinical outcomes in chronic lower extremity wounds. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2009;17(3):306‐11. - PubMed
Chaimani 2013
    1. Chaimani A, Higgins JP, Mavridis D, Spyridonos P, Salanti G. Graphical tools for network meta‐analysis in STATA. PLOS One 2013;8(10):e76654. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076654] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
CINeMA 2017 [Computer program]
    1. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine. Confidence in Network Meta‐Analysis (CINeMA). University of Bern: Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, 2017.
Cipriani 2013
    1. Cipriani A, Higgins JP, Geddes JR, Salanti G. Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta‐analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013;159:130‐7. - PubMed
Coleridge Smith 1988
    1. Coleridge Smith PD, Thomas P, Scurr JH, Dormandy JA. Causes of venous ulceration: a new hypothesis. BMJ 1988;296(6638):1726‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Cullum 2016
    1. Cullum N, Buckley H, Dumville J, Hall J, Lamb K, Madden M, et al. Wounds research for patient benefit: a 5‐year programme of research. Programme Grants for Applied Research 2016;4(13):1‐149. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar04130] - DOI - PubMed
Cutting 2002
    1. Cutting K, White RJ. Maceration of the skin and wound bed 1: its nature and causes. Journal of Wound Care 2002;11(7):275‐8. - PubMed
Dat 2012
    1. Dat AD, Poon F, Pham KB, Doust J. Aloe vera for treating acute and chronic wounds. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008762.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Dias 2010
    1. Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2010;29(7‐8):932‐44. - PubMed
Dias 2013
    1. Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, Caldwell DM, Lu G, Ades AE. Evidence synthesis for decision making 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomized controlled trials. Medical Decision Making 2013;33:641–56. - PMC - PubMed
Dias 2014
    1. Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, Ades AE. NICE DSU technical support document 2: a generalised linear modelling framework for pairwise and network meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials. April 2014. www.nicedsu.org.uk/TSD2%20General%20meta%20analysis%20corrected%2015Apri... (accessed 5 February 2015). - PubMed
Dumville 2009
    1. Dumville JC, Worthy G, Soares MO, Bland JM. VenUS II: a randomised controlled trial of larval therapy in the management of leg ulcers. Health Technology Assessment 2009;13(55):1‐206. - PubMed
Dyson 1992
    1. Dyson M, Young SR, Hart J, Lynch JA, Lang S. Comparison of the effects of moist and dry conditions on the process of angiogenesis during dermal repair. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1992;99(6):729‐33. - PubMed
Ghauri 2010
    1. Ghauri AS, Nyamekye IK. Leg ulceration: the importance of treating the underlying pathophysiology. Phlebology/Venous Forum of the Royal Society of Medicine 2010;25(S1):42‐51. - PubMed
Gohel 2005
    1. Gohel MS, Taylor M, Earnshaw JJ, Heather BP, Poskitt KR, Whyman MR. Risk factors for delayed healing and recurrence of chronic venous leg ulcers ‐ an analysis of 1324 legs. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2005;29(1):74‐7. - PubMed
GRADE 2013
    1. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editor(s), GRADE working group. Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. October 2013. gdt.guidelinedevelopment.org/central_prod/_design/client/handbook/handbo... (accessed 5 February 2016).
Graham 2003
    1. Graham ID, Harrison MB, Nelson EA, Lorimer K, Fisher A. Prevalence of lower‐limb ulceration: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Advances in Skin and Wound Care 2003;16(6):305‐16. - PubMed
Grant 2013
    1. Grant ES, Calderbank‐Batista T. Network meta‐analysis for complex social interventions: problems and potential. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research 2013;4(4):406‐20.
Greer 2013
    1. Greer N, Foman NA, MacDonald R, Dorrian J, Fitzgerald P, Rutks I, et al. Advanced wound care therapies for nonhealing diabetic, venous, and arterial ulcers: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013;159(8):532‐42. - PubMed
Guyatt 2011
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso‐Coello P, Rind D, et al. GRADE guidelines 6: rating the quality of evidence ‐ imprecision. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(12):1283‐93. - PubMed
Hall 2014
    1. Hall J, Buckley HL, Lamb KA, Stubbs N, Saramago P, Dumville JC, et al. Point prevalence of complex wounds in a defined United Kingdom population. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2014;22(6):694‐700. [DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12230] - DOI - PubMed
Herber 2007
    1. Herber OR, Schnepp W, Rieger MA. A systematic review on the impact of leg ulceration on patients' quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2007;5:44. [DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-44] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 1996
    1. Higgins JP, Whitehead A. Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 1996;15:2733–49. - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011a
    1. Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Higgins 2011b
    1. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA, editor(s). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Higgins 2011c
    1. Higgins JP, Deeks JJ, Altman DG, editor(s). Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Higgins 2012
    1. Higgins JP, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades AE, White IR. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies. Research Synthesis Methods 2012;3:98‐110. - PMC - PubMed
Hutchinson 1991
    1. Hutchinson JJ, Lawrence JC. Wound infections under occlusive dressings. Journal of Hospital Infection 1991;17(2):83‐94. - PubMed
Jansen 2013
    1. Jansen JP, Naci H. Is network meta‐analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta‐analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers. BMC Medicine 2013;11:159‐66. - PMC - PubMed
Johnson 1995
    1. Johnson M. The prevalence of leg ulcers in older people: implications for community nursing. Public Health Nursing 1995;12(4):269‐75. - PubMed
Jull 2015
    1. Jull AB, Cullum N, Dumville JC, Westby MJ, Deshpande S, Walker N. Honey as a topical treatment for wounds. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005083.pub4] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Krahn 2013
    1. Krahn U, Binder H, König J. A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta‐analyses. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2013;13:35‐52. - PMC - PubMed
Lefebvre 2011
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Liberati 2009
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLOS Medicine 2009;6:e1000100. - PMC - PubMed
Lu 2004
    1. Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine 2004;23(20):3105–24. - PubMed
Madden 2014
    1. Madden M. Is research in chronic wound care focusing on the outcomes that matter most to patients?. British Sociological Association Annual Conference: Changing Society. 2014:232.
Maddox 2012
    1. Maddox D. Effects of venous leg ulceration on patients’ quality of life. Nursing Standard 2012;26(38):42‐49. - PubMed
Moffatt 2004
    1. Moffatt CJ, Franks PJ, Doherty DC, Martin R, Blewett R, Ross F. Prevalence of leg ulceration in a London population. QJM: Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians 2004;97(7):431‐7. - PubMed
Nelson 2014
    1. Nelson EA, Hillman A, Thomas K. Intermittent pneumatic compression for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001899.pub4] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Nelzen 1994
    1. Nelzen O, Berqvist D, Lindhagen A. Venous and non‐venous leg ulcers: clinical history and appearance in a population study. British Journal of Surgery 1994;81:182‐7. - PubMed
Nelzen 1997
    1. Nelzen O, Bergqvist D, Lindhagen A. Long‐term prognosis for patients with chronic leg ulcers: a prospective cohort study. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 1997;15:500‐8. - PubMed
Nelzen 2008
    1. Nelzen O. Prevalence of venous leg ulcer: the importance of the data collection method. Phlebolymphology 2008;15(4):143‐50.
NICE 2016a
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Clinical knowledge summaries. Leg ulcer ‐ venous. February 2016. cks.nice.org.uk/leg‐ulcer‐venous#!topic summary (accessed 9 November 2016).
NICE 2016b
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Chronic wounds: advanced wound dressings and antimicrobial dressings. Evidence summary [ESMPB2]. March 2016. www.nice.org.uk/advice/esmpb2/chapter/key‐points‐from‐the‐evidence (accessed 9 November 2016).
O'Donnell 2006
    1. O'Donnell JR, Lau J. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of wound dressings for chronic venous ulcer. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006;44(5):1118‐25. - PubMed
O'Meara 2012
    1. O'Meara S, Cullum N, Nelson EA, Dumville JC. Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000265.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
O'Meara 2013
    1. O'Meara S, Martyn‐St James M. Foam dressings for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009907.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
O'Meara 2014
    1. O'Meara S, Al‐Kurdi D, Ologun Y, Ovington LG, Martyn‐St James M, Richardson R. Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003557.pub5] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
O'Meara 2015
    1. O'Meara S, Martyn‐St James M, Adderley UJ. Alginate dressings for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010182.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Parmar 1998
    1. Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta‐analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 1998;17:2815‐34. - PubMed
Persoon 2004
    1. Persoon A, Heinen MM, Vleuten CJ, Rooji MJ, Kerkhof PC, Achterberg T. Leg ulcers: a review of their impact on daily life. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2004;13(3):341‐54. - PubMed
Peters 2008
    1. Peters J, Sutton A, Jones D, Abrams K, Rushton L. Contour‐enhanced meta‐analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61(10):991‐6. - PubMed
Ragnarson 2005
    1. Ragnarson TG, Hjelmgren J. Annual costs of treatment for venous leg ulcers in Sweden and the United Kingdom. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2005;13(1):13‐8. - PubMed
RCN 2013
    1. Royal College of Nursing (RCN). The nursing management of patients with venous leg ulcers: recommendations. www.rcn.org.uk/professional‐development/publications/pub‐000989 (accessed 9 November 2016).
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Ribeiro 2013
    1. Ribeiro CT, Dias FA, Fregonezi GA. Hydrogel dressings for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010738] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Ribeiro 2014
    1. Ribeiro CT, Fregonezi GA, Resqueti VR, Dornelas de Andrade A, Dias FA. Hydrocolloid dressings for healing venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010918] - DOI
Robson 2006
    1. Robson MC, Cooper DM, Aslam R, Gould LJ, Harding KG, Margolis DJ, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of venous ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2006;14(6):649‐62. - PubMed
Salanti 2008
    1. Salanti G, Higgins JP, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Evaluation of networks of randomized trials. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2008;17:279–301. - PubMed
Salanti 2011
    1. Salanti G, Ades A, Ioannidis J. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple‐treatment meta‐analysis: an overview and tutorial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64:163‐71. - PubMed
Salanti 2014
    1. Salanti G, Giovane C, Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Higgins JP. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta‐analysis. PLOS One 2014;9:e99682. - PMC - PubMed
Schünemann 2011a
    1. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JP, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 11: Presenting results and 'Summary of findings' tables. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Schünemann 2011b
    1. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Shaw 2007
    1. Shaw J, Hughes CM, Lagan KM, Bell PM. The clinical effect of topical phenytoin on wound healing: a systematic review. British Journal of Dermatology 2007;157(5):997‐1004. - PubMed
SIGN 2010
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of chronic venous leg ulcers. SIGN guideline 120. 2010. www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign120.pdf. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Healthcare Improvement Scotland, (accessed 9 November 2016).
SIGN 2018
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Search filters. www.sign.ac.uk/search‐filters.html (accessed 18 January 2018).
Soares 2014
    1. Soares MO, Dumville JC, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Treatment comparisons for decision making: facing the problems of sparse and few data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 2014;177(1):259–79.
Spiegelhalter 2003
    1. Spiegelhalter D, Abrams K, Myles J. Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health‐care Evaluation. Chichester: Wiley, 2003.
Srinivasaiah 2007
    1. Srinivasaiah N, Dugdall H, Barrett S, Drew PJ. A point prevalence survey of wounds in north‐east England. Journal of Wound Care 2007;16(10):413‐9. - PubMed
STATA 2011 [Computer program]
    1. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. Version 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp, 2011.
Svensjö 2000
    1. Svensjö T, Pomahac B, Yao F, Slama J, Eriksson E. Accelerated healing of full‐thickness skin wounds in a wet environment. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2000;106(3):602‐12. - PubMed
Thorlund 2012
    1. Thorlund K, Mills EJ. Sample size and power considerations in network meta‐analysis. Systematic Reviews 2012;1:41‐54. - PMC - PubMed
Tierney 2007
    1. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time‐to‐event data into meta‐analysis. Trials 2007;7(8):16. - PMC - PubMed
Tu 2012
    1. Tu Y‐K, Faggion CM. A primer on network meta‐analysis for dental research. International Scholarly Research Notices: Dentistry 2012 June 21 [Epub]:Article ID: 276520. [DOI: 10.5402/2012/276520] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Turner 2012
    1. Turner RM, Davey J, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG, Higgins JP. Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta‐analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. International Journal of Epidemiology 2012;41(3):818‐27. - PMC - PubMed
Valencia 2001
    1. Valencia IC, Falabella A, Kirsner RS, Eaglestein WH. Chronic venous insufficiency and venous leg ulceration. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2001;44:401‐21. - PubMed
Vermeulen 2007
    1. Vermeulen H, Hattem JM, Storm‐Versloot MN, Ubbink DT, Westerbos SJ. Topical silver for treating infected wounds. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005486.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Vowden 2009a
    1. Vowden K, Vowden P. The resource costs of wound care in Bradford and Airedale primary care trust in the UK. Journal of Wound Care 2009;18(3):93‐102. - PubMed
Vowden 2009b
    1. Vowden KR, Vowden P. The prevalence, management and outcome for patients with lower limb ulceration identified in a wound care survey within one English health care district. Journal of Tissue Viability 2009;18(1):13‐9. - PubMed
Walker 2002
    1. Walker N, Rodgers A, Birchall N, Norton R, MacMahon S. The occurrence of leg ulcers in Auckland: results of a population‐based survey. New Zealand Medical Journal 2002;115(1151):159‐62. - PubMed
Westby 2016
    1. Westby MJ, Dumville JC, Stubbs N, Norman G, Cullum N. Protease‐modulating matrix treatments for healing venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011918] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Westby 2017
    1. Westby MJ, Dumville JC, Soares MO, Stubbs N, Norman G. Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011947] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
White 2012
    1. White IR, Barrett JK, Jackson D, Higgins JP. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression. Research Synthesis Methods 2012;3:111‐25. - PMC - PubMed
WinBUGS 2016 [Computer program]
    1. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge Institute of Public Health. WinBUGS. Version 1.4.3. Cambridge: MRC Biostatistics Unit, 2016.
Winter 1962
    1. Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature 1962;193:293‐4. - PubMed
Winter 1963a
    1. Winter GD. Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human skin wounds. Nature 1963;200:378‐9. - PubMed
Winter 1963b
    1. Winter GD, Scales JT. Effect of air drying and dressings on the surface of a wound. Nature 1963;197:91‐2. - PubMed
Woo 2013
    1. Woo KY, Alavi A, Evans R, Despatis M, Allen J. New advances in compression therapy for venous leg ulcers. Surgical Technology International 2013;23:61‐8. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Norman 2017
    1. Norman G, Dumville JC, Westby MJ, Stubbs N, Soares MO. Dressings and topical agents for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012583] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types