Diagnostic yield and accuracy of coronary CT angiography after abnormal nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging
- PMID: 29907855
- PMCID: PMC6003932
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27347-8
Diagnostic yield and accuracy of coronary CT angiography after abnormal nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging
Abstract
We aimed to determine the diagnostic yield and accuracy of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) based on clinical concern for coronary artery disease (CAD) and an abnormal nuclear stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) study. We enrolled 100 patients (84 male, mean age 59.6 ± 8.9 years) with an abnormal MPI study and subsequent referral for ICA. Each patient underwent CCTA prior to ICA. We analyzed the prevalence of potentially obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) on CCTA and calculated the diagnostic accuracy of ≥50% stenosis on CCTA for the detection of clinically significant CAD on ICA (defined as any ≥70% stenosis or ≥50% left main stenosis). On CCTA, 54 patients had at least one ≥50% stenosis. With ICA, 45 patients demonstrated clinically significant CAD. A positive CCTA had 100% sensitivity and 84% specificity with a 100% negative predictive value and 83% positive predictive value for clinically significant CAD on a per patient basis in MPI positive symptomatic patients. In conclusion, almost half (48%) of patients with suspected CAD and an abnormal MPI study demonstrate no obstructive CAD on CCTA.
Conflict of interest statement
This study was supported by a research grant provided by GE Healthcare (Wauwatosa/WI/United States). UJS is a consultant for and/or receives institutional research support from Astellas, Bayer, Bracco, GE, Guerbet, HeartFlow, and Siemens Healthineers. FGM has received institutional research support from Siemens, unrelated to this investigation. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.Acad Radiol. 2017 Jan;24(1):22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Oct 19. Acad Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27771227
-
Prospective comparison of integrated on-site CT-fractional flow reserve and static CT perfusion with coronary CT angiography for detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis.Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):5096-5105. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07508-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6. Eur Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33409778
-
Diagnostic performance of static single-scan stress perfusion cardiac computed tomography in detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with combined invasive coronary angiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance-myocardial perfusion imaging.Acta Radiol. 2018 Oct;59(10):1184-1193. doi: 10.1177/0284185117752553. Epub 2018 Jan 10. Acta Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29320864
-
CT-based myocardial ischemia evaluation: quantitative angiography, transluminal attenuation gradient, myocardial perfusion, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jun;32 Suppl 1:1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0825-5. Epub 2015 Dec 14. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 26667445 Review.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive cardiac imaging modalities in patients with a history of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.Heart. 2024 Dec 13;111(1):4-10. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324248. Heart. 2024. PMID: 39179368 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Optimization of Retrospective Gated-ECG Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography by Dose Reduction in Patients with Different Body Mass Indexes.J Biomed Phys Eng. 2025 Jun 1;15(3):281-290. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2209-1537. eCollection 2025 Jun. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2025. PMID: 40510307 Free PMC article.
-
Developing an ML-Based Pretest Probability Model of Obstructive CAD in Patients With Stable Chest Pain.JACC Asia. 2025 Jul;5(7):865-880. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.03.015. Epub 2025 Jun 10. JACC Asia. 2025. PMID: 40498432 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance as Pathophysiologic Tool in Diabetes Mellitus.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 14;12:672302. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.672302. eCollection 2021. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34194393 Free PMC article. Review.
-
CT Angiography Followed by Invasive Angiography in Patients With Moderate or Severe Ischemia-Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jul;14(7):1384-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.11.012. Epub 2021 Jan 13. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021. PMID: 33454249 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Machine learning of clinical variables and coronary artery calcium scoring for the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: analysis from the CONFIRM registry.Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):359-367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz565. Eur Heart J. 2020. PMID: 31513271 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Knuuti, J. et al. Risks and benefits of cardiac imaging: an analysis of risks related to imaging for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J (2013). - PubMed
-
- Meijboom WB, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:636–643. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.024. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous