Objective Evaluation of a Didactic Curriculum for the Radiation Oncology Medical Student Clerkship
- PMID: 29908787
- PMCID: PMC6538302
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.052
Objective Evaluation of a Didactic Curriculum for the Radiation Oncology Medical Student Clerkship
Abstract
Purpose: A structured didactic radiation oncology clerkship curriculum for medical students is in use at multiple academic medical centers. Objective evidence supporting this educational approach over the traditional clerkship model is lacking. This study evaluated the curriculum efficacy using an objective knowledge assessment.
Methods and materials: Medical students received the Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group (ROECSG) curriculum consisting of 3 lectures (Overview of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Biology/Physics, and Practical Aspects of Simulation/Radiation Emergencies) and a radiation oncology treatment-planning workshop. A standardized 20-item multiple choice question (MCQ) knowledge assessment was completed pre- and post-curriculum and approximately 6 months after receiving the curriculum.
Results: One hundred forty-six students at 22 academic medical centers completed the ROECSG curriculum from July to November 2016. One hundred nine students completed pre- and post-clerkship MCQ knowledge assessments (response rate 74.7%). Twenty-four students reported a prior rotation at a ROECSG institution and were excluded from analysis. Mean assessment scores increased from pre- to post-curriculum (63.9% vs 80.2%, P < .01). Mean MCQ knowledge subdomain assessment scores all improved post-curriculum (t test, P values < .01). Post-scores for students rotating de novo at ROECSG institutions (n = 30) were higher compared with pre-scores for students with ≥1 prior rotations at non-ROECSG institutions (n = 55) (77.3% vs 68.8%, P = .01), with an effect size of 0.8. Students who completed rotations at ROECSG institutions continued to demonstrate a trend toward improved performance on the objective knowledge assessment at approximately 6 months after curriculum exposure (70.5% vs 65.6%, P = .11).
Conclusions: Objective evaluation of a structured didactic curriculum for the radiation oncology clerkship at early and late time points demonstrated significant improvement in radiation oncology knowledge. Students who completed clerkships at ROECSG institutions performed objectively better than students who completed clerkships at non-ROECSG institutions. These results support including a structured didactic curriculum as a standard component of the radiation oncology clerkship.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: Dr Golden reports a financial interest in RadOncQuestions, LLC. No other authors report conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Wisniewski WR, Fournier KF, Ling YK, et al. A focused curriculum in surgical oncology for the third-year medical students. J Surg Res 2013;185:555–560. - PubMed
-
- Tews MC, Ditz Wyte CM, Coltman M, et al. Implementing a third-year emergency medicine medical student curriculum. J Emerg Med 2015;48:732–743.e8. - PubMed
-
- Cipriano SD, Dybbro E, Boscardin CK, et al. Online learning in a dermatology clerkship: Piloting the new American Academy of Dermatology Medical Student Core Curriculum. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013;69:267–272. - PubMed
-
- Slaughenhoupt BL, Lester RA, Rowe JM, et al. Design, implementation and evaluation of a new core learning objectives curriculum for a urology clerkship. J Urol 2013;186:1417–1421. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
