Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 1;4(1):15.
doi: 10.3390/sports4010015.

Type of Ground Surface during Plyometric Training Affects the Severity of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage

Affiliations

Type of Ground Surface during Plyometric Training Affects the Severity of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage

Hamid Arazi et al. Sports (Basel). .

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the changes in the symptoms of exercise-induced muscle damage from a bout of plyometric exercise (PE; 10 × 10 vertical jumps) performed in aquatic, sand and firm conditions. Twenty-four healthy college-aged men were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Aquatic (AG, n = 8), Sand (SG, n = 8) and Firm (FG, n = 8). The AG performed PE in an aquatic setting with a depth of ~130 cm. The SG performed PE on a dry sand surface at a depth of 20 cm, and the FG performed PE on a 10-cm-thick wooden surface. Plasma creatine kinase (CK) activity, delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), knee range of motion (KROM), maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) of the knee extensors, vertical jump (VJ) and 10-m sprint were measured before and 24, 48 and 72 h after the PE. Compared to baseline values, FG showed significantly (p < 0.05) greater changes in CK, DOMS, and VJ at 24 until 48 h. The MIVC decreased significantly for the SG and FG at 24 until 48 h post-exercise in comparison to the pre-exercise values. There were no significant (p > 0.05) time or group by time interactions in KROM. In the 10-m sprint, all the treatment groups showed significant (p < 0.05) changes compared to pre-exercise values at 24 h, and there were no significant (p > 0.05) differences between groups. The results indicate that PE in an aquatic setting and on a sand surface induces less muscle damage than on a firm surface. Therefore, training in aquatic conditions and on sand may be beneficial for the improvement of performance, with a concurrently lower risk of muscle damage and soreness.

Keywords: aquatic setting; muscle soreness; plyometric exercise; sand surface.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean ± SD for creatine kinase (CK) activity (A), delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) (B), knee flexion range of motion (C), maximal isometric voluntary contraction (D), vertical jump (E) and 10-m sprint (F) at baseline and 24–72 h following 100 plyometric jumps. AG: Aquatic group; SG: Sand group; FG: Firm group. *: Significant difference compared to AG and SG (p ≤ 0.05); †: Significant difference compared to baseline (p ≤ 0.05).

References

    1. Potach D., Chu D.A. Plyometric training. In: Bachle T., Erale R., editors. Essential of Strength and Conditioning. Human Kinetic; Champaign, IL, USA: 2000. pp. 135–141.
    1. Arazi H., Asadi A. The effect of aquatic and land plyometric training on strength, sprint, and balance in young basketball players. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 2011;6:101–111. doi: 10.4100/jhse.2011.61.12. - DOI
    1. Asadi A., Arazi H. Effects of high-intensity plyometric training on dynamic balance, agility, vertical jump and sprint performance in young male basketball players. J. Sport Health Res. 2012;4:34–44.
    1. Robinson L.E., Décor S.T., Merrick M.A., Buckworth J. The effects of land vs. aquatic plyometrics on power, torque, velocity, and muscle soreness in women. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2004;18:84–91. - PubMed
    1. Asadi A., Saez de Villarreal E., Arazi H. The effects of plyometric type neuromuscular training on postural control performance of male team basketball players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2015;29:1870–1875. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000832. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources