This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 1978:(Suppl 8):193-6.

B Almqvist et al. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1978.

. 1978:(Suppl 8):193-6.

No abstract available

[Audiometry over an expanded frequency range in the diagnosis of different forms of otosclerosis].
Kholopova RV, Dovgaliuk AIu. Kholopova RV, et al. Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn. 1979 Sep-Oct;(5):20-3. Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn. 1979. PMID: 494754 Russian. No abstract available.
Comparing pure-tone audiometry and auditory steady state response for the measurement of hearing loss.
Ahn JH, Lee HS, Kim YJ, Yoon TH, Chung JW. Ahn JH, et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jun;136(6):966-71. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.12.008. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007. PMID: 17547989
Advantages with a new Bekesy audiometer in the measurement of noise induced hearing loss.
Ivarsson A, Erlandsson B, Håkanson H, Nilsson P. Ivarsson A, et al. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1980 Aug;(Suppl 12):265-72. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1980. PMID: 6939097 No abstract available.
Guidelines for identification audiometry.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] ASHA. 1985 May;27(5):49-52, 40. ASHA. 1985. PMID: 4004982 No abstract available.
Using equipment in unfamiliar clinical settings: audiology screening.
Kratz IC. Kratz IC. J Pediatr Nurs. 1997 Oct;12(5):307-10. doi: 10.1016/s0882-5963(97)80054-1. J Pediatr Nurs. 1997. PMID: 9330507 Review. No abstract available.