Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 1:9:625.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00625. eCollection 2018.

Immunomodulatory Effects of Dietary Seaweeds in LPS Challenged Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar as Determined by Deep RNA Sequencing of the Head Kidney Transcriptome

Affiliations

Immunomodulatory Effects of Dietary Seaweeds in LPS Challenged Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar as Determined by Deep RNA Sequencing of the Head Kidney Transcriptome

Arjan P Palstra et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Seaweeds may represent immuno-stimulants that could be used as health-promoting fish feed components. This study was performed to gain insights into the immunomodulatory effects of dietary seaweeds in Atlantic salmon. Specifically tested were 10% inclusion levels of Laminaria digitata (SW1) and a commercial blend of seaweeds (Oceanfeed®) (SW2) against a fishmeal based control diet (FMC). Differences between groups were assessed in growth, feed conversion ratio and blood parameters hematocrit and hemoglobin. After a LPS challenge of fish representing each of the three groups, RNAseq was performed on the head kidney as major immune organ to determine transcriptomic differences in response to the immune activation. Atlantic salmon fed with dietary seaweeds did not show major differences in performance in comparison with fishmeal fed fish. RNAseq resulted in ∼154 million reads which were mapped against a NCBI Salmo salar reference and against a de novo assembled S. salar reference for analyses of expression of immune genes and ontology of immune processes among the 87,600 cDNA contigs. The dietary seaweeds provoked a more efficient immune response which involved more efficient identification of the infection site, and processing and presentation of antigens. More specifically, chemotaxis and the chemokine-mediated signaling were improved and therewith the defense response to Gram-positive bacterium reduced. Specific Laminaria digitata effects included reduction of the interferon-gamma-mediated signaling. Highly upregulated and specific for this diet was the expression of major histocompatibility complex class I-related gene protein. The commercial blend of seaweeds caused more differential expression than Laminaria digitata and improved immune processes such as receptor-mediated endocytosis and cell adhesion, and increased the expression of genes involved in response to lipopolysaccharide and inflammatory response. Particularly, expression of many important immune receptors was up-regulated illustrating increased responsiveness. NF-kappa-B inhibitor alpha is an important gene that marked the difference between both seaweed diets as Laminaria digitata inhibits the expression for this cytokine while the blend of seaweeds stimulates it. It can be concluded that the inclusion of seaweeds such as Laminaria digitata can have important modulatory effects on the immune capacity of Atlantic salmon resulting in a more efficient immune response.

Keywords: Atlantic salmon Salmo salar; RNAseq; aquaculture; dietary seaweeds; head kidney transcriptome; immune response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Atlantic salmon performance when fed with the FMC, SW1 and SW2 diets. (A) Feed intake in g.fish-1.d-1 on dry matter basis. (B) Feed conversion ratio (FCR) on dry matter basis. (C) Growth in metabolic body weight (g.kg0.8.d-1). (D) Specific growth rate (%.d-1). (E) Hct in %. (F) Hemoglobin (g.l-1). Fish fed with seaweed diets tended to have higher FCRdm values (P = 0.075) and less individual variation in growth.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Heat map of the 15 main biological processes indicating the differences between diet comparisons. Shown are GO terms and descriptions; seaweed (SW) diets 1 and 2 scores of up- and down-regulated genes. Also indicated the significant differences (P < 0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anders S., Huber W. (2010). Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11:R106 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anders S., Pyl P. T., Huber W. (2014). HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31 166–169. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bagni M., Romano N., Finoia M. G., Abellic L., Scapigliati G., Tiscar P. G. (2005). Short- and long-term effects of a dietary yeast b-glucan (Macrogard) and alginic acid (Ergosan) preparation on immune response in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 18 311–325. 10.1016/j.fsi.2004.08.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bansemir A., Blume M., Schröder S., Lindequist U. (2006). Screening of cultivated seaweeds for antibacterial activity against fish pathogenic bacteria. Aquaculture 252 79–84. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.051 - DOI
    1. Blouin C. M., Lamaze C. (2013). Interferon gamma receptor: the beginning of the journey. Front. Immunol. 4:267 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00267 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources