Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May-Jun;8(3):224-228.
doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_77_18. Epub 2018 May 17.

Comparison between Growth Patterns and Pharyngeal Widths in Different Skeletal Malocclusions in South Indian Population

Affiliations

Comparison between Growth Patterns and Pharyngeal Widths in Different Skeletal Malocclusions in South Indian Population

K Bhagya Lakshmi et al. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 May-Jun.

Abstract

Aim: The main aim is to determine whether growth pattern had an effect on the upper airway by comparing different craniofacial patterns with pharyngeal widths and its importance during the clinical examination.

Methodology: Sixty lateral cephalograms of patients aged between 16 and 24 years with no pharyngeal pathology or nasal obstruction were selected for the study. These were divided into skeletal Class I (n = 30) and skeletal Class II (n = 30) using ANB angle subdivided into normodivergent, hyperdivergent, and hypodivergent facial patterns based on SN-GoGn angle. McNamara's airway analysis was used to determine the upper- and lower-airway dimensions. One-way ANOVA was used to do the intergroup comparisons and the Tukey's test as the secondary statistical analysis.

Results: Statistically significant difference exists between the upper-airway dimensions in both the skeletal malocclusions with hyperdivergent growth patterns when compared to other growth patterns.

Conclusion: In both the skeletal malocclusions, vertical growers showed a significant decrease in the airway size than the horizontal and normal growers. There is no statistical significance between the lower airway and craniofacial growth pattern.

Keywords: Lower pharyngeal width; McNamara analysis; upper pharyngeal width.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classification of sample size
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cephalometric tracing

References

    1. Grewal N, Godhane AV. Lateral cephalometry: A simple and economical clinical guide for assessment of nasopharyngeal free airway space in mouth breathers. Contemp Clin Dent. 2010;1:66–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rizk S, Kulbersh VP, Al-Qawasmi R. Changes in the oropharyngeal airway of class II patients treated with the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:955–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iqbal N, Rasool G, Alam T, Hussain U, Shah SS. Comparison of different craniofacial patterns with pharyngeal widths. JKCD. 2015;6:20–4.
    1. Ucar FI, Uysal T. Orofacial airway dimensions in subjects with class I malocclusion and different growth patterns. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:460–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aboudara C, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher D, et al. Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:468–79. - PubMed