Emerging models for facilitating contact between people genetically related through donor conception: a preliminary analysis and discussion
- PMID: 29911188
- PMCID: PMC6001351
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2015.10.001
Emerging models for facilitating contact between people genetically related through donor conception: a preliminary analysis and discussion
Abstract
Previous research indicates interest among some donor-conceived people, donors and recipient parents in having contact. Outcomes of such contact appear largely, but not universally, positive. This paper seeks to understand better the characteristics of associated support services. Information gathered using the authors' direct experiences and professional and personal networks in different parts of the world indicates the emergence of four main groupings: (i) publically funded services outside of treatment centers; (ii) services provided by fertility treatment or gamete bank services; (iii) services provided privately by independent psychosocial or legal practitioners; and (4) services organized by offspring and/or recipient parents. Key operational features examined were: (i) who can access such services and when; (ii) what professional standards and funding are in place to provide them; and (iii) how 'matching' and contact processes are managed. Differences appear influenced variously by the needs of those directly affected, local policies, national legislation and the interests of the fertility services which recruit gamete donors and/or deliver donor conception treatments. The paper is intended to inform fuller debate about how best to meet the needs of those seeking information and contact, the implications for the way that fertility treatment and gametes donation services are currently provided and future research needs.
Keywords: donor conception; donor-conceived people; donors; information exchange/contact; intermediary services.
Similar articles
-
Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.Hum Reprod. 2019 Apr 1;34(4):672-678. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez009. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 30805634
-
Expectations and experiences of gamete donors and donor-conceived adults searching for genetic relatives using DNA linking through a voluntary register.Hum Reprod. 2015 Jan;30(1):111-21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu289. Epub 2014 Oct 29. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25358347
-
Female-partnered and single women's contact motivations and experiences with donor-linked families.Hum Reprod. 2015 Jun;30(6):1375-85. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev077. Epub 2015 Apr 16. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25883034
-
Disclosure of donor conception in the era of non-anonymity: safeguarding and promoting the interests of donor-conceived individuals?Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov;31(11):2416-2420. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew240. Epub 2016 Oct 3. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 27698073 Review.
-
The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspring.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;20(3):265-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32830136ca. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18460941 Review.
Cited by
-
Embodied sociotechnical imaginaries: how donor-conceived people imagine identity, family and reprodigital futures beyond regulation.Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 Jan 11;4:1221913. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1221913. eCollection 2023. Front Glob Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 38283654 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of the characteristics, motivations, preferences and expectations of men donating sperm online or through a sperm bank.Hum Reprod. 2019 Nov 1;34(11):2208-2218. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez173. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 31711146 Free PMC article.
-
Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor.Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Dec 23;2020(4):hoaa057. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa057. eCollection 2020. Hum Reprod Open. 2020. PMID: 33585704 Free PMC article.
-
Applications to statutory donor registers in Victoria, Australia: information sought and expectations of contact.Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Sep 4;9:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.08.002. eCollection 2019 Dec. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019. PMID: 31956702 Free PMC article.
-
Adolescents Conceived through Donor Insemination in Mother-Headed Families: A Qualitative Study of Motivations and Experiences of Contacting and Meeting Same-donor Offspring.Child Soc. 2017 Jan;31(1):13-22. doi: 10.1111/chso.12158. Epub 2016 Apr 14. Child Soc. 2017. PMID: 28042200 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adams D., Allan S. Building a family tree: donor-conceived people, DNA tracing and donor ‘anonymity’. Aust. J. Adopt. 2013;7:1–16.
-
- Adams D., Lorbach C. Accessing donor conception information in Australia: a call for retrospective access. J. Law Med. 2012;19:707–721. - PubMed
-
- Allan S. Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia; Australia: 2012. A Cross-jurisdictional Study of Regulatory Requirements and Practice Regarding the Recording of Donor Information and its Release to Donor Conceived People.
-
- ANZICA ANZICA Guidelines for professional standards of practice: donor linking counselling. 2011. http://www.fertilitysociety.com.au/wp-content/uploads/20120504-anzica-gu... (06.01.2015)
-
- Baran A., Pannor R. Warner; New York: 1989. Lethal secrets: the shocking consequences and unsolved problems of artificial insemination.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources