Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1281-1290.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey216.

The impact of cancer on subsequent chance of pregnancy: a population-based analysis

Affiliations

The impact of cancer on subsequent chance of pregnancy: a population-based analysis

Richard A Anderson et al. Hum Reprod. .

Abstract

Study question: What is the impact of cancer in females aged ≤39 years on subsequent chance of pregnancy?

Summary answer: Cancer survivors achieved fewer pregnancies across all cancer types, and the chance of achieving a first pregnancy was also lower.

What is known already: The diagnosis and treatment of cancer in young females may be associated with reduced fertility but the true pregnancy deficit in a population is unknown.

Study design, size, duration: We performed a retrospective cohort study relating first incident cancer diagnosed between 1981 and 2012 to subsequent pregnancy in all female patients in Scotland aged 39 years or less at cancer diagnosis (n = 23 201). Pregnancies were included up to end of 2014. Females from the exposed group not pregnant before cancer diagnosis (n = 10 271) were compared with general population controls matched for age, deprivation quintile and year of diagnosis.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: Scottish Cancer Registry records were linked to hospital discharge records to calculate standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for pregnancy, standardized for age and year of diagnosis. Linkage to death records was also performed. We also selected women from the exposed group who had not been pregnant prior to their cancer diagnosis who were compared with a matched control group from the general population. Additional analyses were performed for breast cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, leukaemia, cervical cancer and brain/CNS cancers.

Main results and the role of chance: Cancer survivors achieved fewer pregnancies: SIR 0.62 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.63). Reduced SIR was observed for all cancer types. The chance of achieving a first pregnancy was also lower, adjusted hazard ratio = 0.57 (95% CI: 0.53, 0.61) for women >5 years after diagnosis, with marked reductions in women with breast, cervical and brain/CNS tumours, and leukaemia. The effect was reduced with more recent treatment period overall and in cervical cancer, breast cancer and Hodgkin lymphoma, but was unchanged for leukaemia or brain/CNS cancers. The proportion of pregnancies that ended in termination was lower after a cancer diagnosis, and the proportion ending in live birth was higher (78.7 vs 75.6%, CI of difference: 1.1, 5.0).

Limitations, reasons for caution: Details of treatments received were not available, so the impact of specific treatment regimens on fertility could not be assessed. Limited duration of follow-up was available for women diagnosed in the most recent time period.

Wider implications of the findings: This analysis provides population-based quantification by cancer type of the effect of cancer and its treatment on subsequent pregnancy across the reproductive age range, and how this has changed in recent decades. The demonstration of a reduced chance of pregnancy across all cancer types and the changing impact in some but not other common cancers highlights the need for appropriate fertility counselling of all females of reproductive age at diagnosis.

Study funding/competing interest(s): This study was funded by NHS Lothian Cancer and Leukaemia Endowments Fund. Part of this work was undertaken in the MRC Centre for Reproductive Health which is funded by the MRC Centre grant MR/N022556/1. RAA has participated in Advisory Boards and/or received speaker's fees from Beckman Coulter, IBSA, Merck and Roche Diagnostics. He has received research support from Roche Diagnostics, Ansh labs and Ferring. The other authors have no conflicts to declare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The impact of specific cancer diagnoses on the overall pregnancy deficit. The data shown are the differences between the number of pregnancies expected and those observed for each diagnostic group over the period of this study, represented graphically as a proportion of the total pregnancy deficit. Thus women with cervical cancer aged up to 39 had 1059 fewer pregnancies than matched controls over the period 1984–2014, which was 26% of the total pregnancy deficit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative probability of first pregnancy after cancer diagnosis (red) in all women with cancer compared to population controls (blue), and in women with breast, cervical, brain/CNS cancers, Hodgkin lymphoma and leukaemia. Tables under each panel indicate the number of women with cancer and controls at the time of diagnosis, and at subsequent time points up to 30 years.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative probability of first pregnancy after cancer diagnosis (red) in women with diagnoses other than those shown in Fig. 2 compared to population controls (blue). Tables under each panel indicate the number of women with cancer and controls at the time of diagnosis, and at subsequent time points up to 30 years.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Adjusted HR (with 95% CI) for first pregnancy after cancer diagnosis by period of diagnosis for women with breast, cervical, Hodgkin lymphoma, leukaemia and brain/CNS cancers.

Comment in

References

    1. Anderson RA, Mitchell RT, Kelsey TW, Spears N, Telfer EE, Wallace WH. Cancer treatment and gonadal function: experimental and established strategies for fertility preservation in children and young adults. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015;3:556–567. - PubMed
    1. Argyle CE, Harper JC, Davies MC. Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now? Hum Reprod Update 2016;22:440–449. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong GT, Chen Y, Yasui Y, Leisenring W, Gibson TM, Mertens AC, Stovall M, Oeffinger KC, Bhatia S, Krull KR et al. . Reduction in late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;374:833–842. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armuand G, Skoog-Svanberg A, Bladh M, Sydsjo G. Reproductive patterns among childhood and adolescent cancer survivors in Sweden: a population-based matched-cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:1577–1583. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azim HA Jr., Kroman N, Paesmans M, Gelber S, Rotmensz N, Ameye L, De Mattos-Arruda L, Pistilli B, Pinto A, Jensen MB et al. . Prognostic impact of pregnancy after breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status: a multicenter retrospective study. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:73–79. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types