Evidence-Based Optimization of Post-Treatment Surveillance for Skull Base Chordomas Based on Local and Distant Disease Progression
- PMID: 29912434
- DOI: 10.1093/ons/opy073
Evidence-Based Optimization of Post-Treatment Surveillance for Skull Base Chordomas Based on Local and Distant Disease Progression
Abstract
Background: There are no guidelines regarding post-treatment surveillance specific to skull base chordomas.
Objective: To determine an optimal imaging surveillance schedule to detect both local and distant metastatic skull base chordoma recurrences.
Methods: A retrospective review of 91 patients who underwent treatment for skull base chordoma between 1993 and 2017 was conducted. Time to and location of local and distant recurrence(s) were cataloged. Existing chordoma surveillance recommendations (National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN], London and South East Sarcoma Network [LSESN], European Society for Medical Oncology [ESMO], Chordoma Global Consensus Group [CGCG]) were applied to our cohort to compare the number of recurrent patients and months of undiagnosed tumor growth between surveillances. These findings were used to inform the creation of a revised imaging surveillance protocol (MD Anderson Cancer Center Chordoma Imaging Protocol [MDACC-CIP]), presented here.
Results: Thirty-four patients with 79 local/systemic recurrences met inclusion criteria. Mean age at diagnosis and follow-up time were 45 yr and 79 mo, respectively. The MDACC-CIP imaging protocol significantly reduced the time to diagnosis of recurrence compared with the LSESN and CGCG/ESMO imaging protocols for surveillance of local disease with a cumulative/average of 576/16.9 (LSESN), 336/9.8 (CGCG), and 170/5.0 (MDACC-CIP) months of undetected growth, respectively. The NCCN and MDACC-CIP guidelines for distant metastatic surveillance identified a cumulative/average of 65/6.5 and 51/5.1 mo of undetected growth, respectively, and were not significantly different.
Conclusion: The MDACC-CIP for skull base chordoma accounts for recurrence trends unique to this disease, including a higher rate of leptomeningeal spread than sacrococcygeal primaries, resulting in improved sensitivity and prompt diagnosis.
Similar articles
-
Extent of Surgical Resection as a Predictor of Tumor Progression in Skull Base Chordomas: A Multicenter Volumetric Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2024 Jan;181:e620-e627. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.101. Epub 2023 Oct 28. World Neurosurg. 2024. PMID: 37898264
-
Prognostic Implications of Gadolinium Enhancement of Skull Base Chordomas.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):1509-1514. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5714. Epub 2018 Jun 14. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018. PMID: 29903925 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients with skull base chordoma: a retrospective analysis of 238 patients.J Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;127(6):1257-1267. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS16559. Epub 2017 Jan 6. J Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 28059654
-
[Chordoma].Neurochirurgie. 2014 Jun;60(3):63-140. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 May 23. Neurochirurgie. 2014. PMID: 24856008 Review. French.
-
Surgical resection of skull-base chordomas: experience in case selection for surgical approach according to anatomical compartments and review of the literature.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Oct;159(10):1835-1845. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-3032-9. Epub 2016 Dec 6. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017. PMID: 27924417 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous