Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 1;33(6):743-754.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy045.

The cost of preventing undernutrition: cost, cost-efficiency and cost-effectiveness of three cash-based interventions on nutrition outcomes in Dadu, Pakistan

Lani Trenouth  1 , Timothy Colbourn  2 , Bridget Fenn  3 , Silke Pietzsch  1 , Mark Myatt  4 , Chloe Puett  1
Affiliations

The cost of preventing undernutrition: cost, cost-efficiency and cost-effectiveness of three cash-based interventions on nutrition outcomes in Dadu, Pakistan

Lani Trenouth et al. Health Policy Plan. .

Abstract

Cash-based interventions (CBIs) increasingly are being used to deliver humanitarian assistance and there is growing interest in the cost-effectiveness of cash transfers for preventing undernutrition in emergency contexts. The objectives of this study were to assess the costs, cost-efficiency and cost-effectiveness in achieving nutrition outcomes of three CBIs in southern Pakistan: a 'double cash' (DC) transfer, a 'standard cash' (SC) transfer and a 'fresh food voucher' (FFV) transfer. Cash and FFVs were provided to poor households with children aged 6-48 months for 6 months in 2015. The SC and FFV interventions provided $14 monthly and the DC provided $28 monthly. Cost data were collected via institutional accounting records, interviews, programme observation, document review and household survey. Cost-effectiveness was assessed as cost per case of wasting, stunting and disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted. Beneficiary costs were higher for the cash groups than the voucher group. Net total cost transfer ratios (TCTRs) were estimated as 1.82 for DC, 2.82 for SC and 2.73 for FFV. Yet, despite the higher operational costs, the FFV TCTR was lower than the SC TCTR when incorporating the participation cost to households, demonstrating the relevance of including beneficiary costs in cost-efficiency estimations. The DC intervention achieved a reduction in wasting, at $4865 per case averted; neither the SC nor the FFV interventions reduced wasting. The cost per case of stunting averted was $1290 for DC, $882 for SC and $883 for FFV. The cost per DALY averted was $641 for DC, $434 for SC and $563 for FFV without discounting or age weighting. These interventions are highly cost-effective by international thresholds. While it is debatable whether these resource requirements represent a feasible or sustainable investment given low health expenditures in Pakistan, these findings may provide justification for continuing Pakistan's investment in national social safety nets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for averting cases of wasting in DC arm compared with the CG.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for averting cases of stunting in all arms compared with the CG.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for averting DALYs in all arms compared with the CG.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Action Against Hunger (ACF). 2013. Household Economy Report. Women and Children/Infants Improved Nutrition in Sindh Province (WINS), Dadu District. Unpublished.
    1. Amouzou A, Richard SA, Friberg IK. et al. 2010. How well does LiST capture mortality by wealth quintile? A comparison of measured versus modelled mortality rates among children under-five in Bangladesh. International Journal of Epidemiology 39: i186–92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bachmann MO. 2009. Cost effectiveness of community-based therapeutic care for children with severe acute malnutrition in Zambia: decision tree model. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 7: 2.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailey S, Hedlund K.. 2012. The Impact of Cash Transfers on Nutrition in Emergency and Transitional Contexts: A Review of the Evidence. HPG Commissioned Reports. London: Overseas Development Institute; http://bit.ly/2hMRRRh, accessed 5 May 2017.
    1. Bastagli F, Hagen-Zanker J, Harman L. et al. 2016. Cash Transfers: What Does the Evidence Say? London: Overseas Development Institute; http://bit.ly/2av62Ya, accessed 9 February 2018.