Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 15;23(6):1463.
doi: 10.3390/molecules23061463.

Preparation of Enzyme-Activated Thapsigargin Prodrugs by Solid-Phase Synthesis

Affiliations

Preparation of Enzyme-Activated Thapsigargin Prodrugs by Solid-Phase Synthesis

Tomas Zimmermann et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Since cells in solid tumors divide less rapidly than cells in the bone marrow or cells of the immune system, mitotic inhibitors often cause severe side effects when used for treatment of diseases like prostate cancer and breast cancer. One approach to overcome this problem involves attempts at developing drugs based on general cytotoxins, like calicheamicin and thapsigargin, which kill cells at all phases of the cell cycle. However, such toxins can only be used when efficient targeting to the malignant tissue is possible. In the case of thapsigargin, selectivity for tumor-associated cells is achieved by conjugating the drug to a peptide that is only cleaved in the vicinity of tumors to release the cytotoxic drug or an analog with retained activity. Solid-phase synthesis protocols were developed for preparation of three already validated prodrugs of thapsigargin: one prodrug cleavable by human kallikrein 2, one prodrug cleavable by prostate-specific antigen, and one prodrug cleavable by prostate-specific membrane antigen.

Keywords: mipsagargin; prodrug; solid-phase peptide synthesis: cytotoxin-peptide conjugation; targeted chemotherapy; thapsigargin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structures of thapsigargin (1), 8-O-(12-aminododecanoyl)-8-O-debutanoylthapsigargin (5) and the prodrugs G114 (2), G115 (4), G202 (Mipsagargin, 6), and the cleavage products 3 and 7 as well as 8-O-debutanoylthapsigargin (11).
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Synthesis of amino acid conjugate 8. Reagents and conditions: (a) Fmoc-OSu, NaHCO3, H2O–Acetone (1:1), 20 h; (b) 2-chlorotrityl chloride resin, DIPEA, dichloromethane (DCM), 3 h; (c) 20% piperidine–DMF, 2 × 20 min; (d) Fmoc-Asp-OtBu, PyBOP, DIPEA, DMF, 16 h; (e) Ac2O–DIPEA–NMP (1:2:3, 2 × 5 min; (f) 20% hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP)–DCM, 3 × 30 min; (g) 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC), DMAP, 8 DCM, 14 h; (h) trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)–DCM (2:1), 1 h; all reactions were carried out at room temperature (rt).
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Synthesis of G114 (2). Reagents and conditions: (a) Fmoc–Leu–OH, DIPEA, DCM, rt, 3.5 h; (b) solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) of non-acetylated peptide on a microwave peptide synthesizer; (c) Ac2O–DIPEA–NMP (1:2:3), rt, 2 × 10 min; (d) 20% HFIP–DCM, 3 × 30 min, rt; (e) 5, PyBOP, DIPEA, DCM, DMF (few drops), rt, 13 h; (f) TFA (with a few drops of H2O added), rt, 24 h.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Synthesis of G115 (4). Reagents and conditions: (a) Fmoc–Leu–OH, DIPEA, DCM, rt, 3.5 h; (b) Microwave (MW)-assisted SPPS of peptide without N-terminal modification; (c) morpholine-4-carbonyl chloride–Et3N–NMP (1:4:20), 40 °C, 3 h; (d) 20% HFIP–DCM, 3 × 30 min, rt; (e) 5, PyBOP, DIPEA, DCM, DMF (few drops), rt, 14 h; (f) TFA (with a few drops of H2O added), rt, 2 h.
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
Continuous solid-phase synthesis (SPS) of Mipsagargin (6). Reagents and conditions: (a) Fmoc-Glu-OtBu, DIPEA, DCM, 3 h; (b) Fmoc-Glu-OtBu, PyBOP, DIPEA, DMF, 16 h; (c) 20% piperidine–DMF, 2 × 20 min; (d) Boc-Asp(All)-OH, PyBOP, DIPEA, DMF, 18 h; (e) Me2NBH3 in DCM, Pd(PPh3)4 in DCM, 6 h; (f) 5, PyBOP, DIPEA, DCM, 18 h; (g) TFA–DCM (1:1 with a few drops of H2O added), 1 h; all reactions were carried out at rt.

References

    1. Cragg G.M., Grothaus P.G., Newman D.J. Impact of natural products on developing new anti-cancer agents. Chem. Rev. 2009;109:3012–3043. doi: 10.1021/cr900019j. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jordan M.A., Wilson L. Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2004;4:253–265. doi: 10.1038/nrc1317. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rao C.V., Kurkjian C.D., Yamada H.Y. Mitosis-targeting natural products for cancer prevention and therapy. Curr. Drug Targets. 2012;13:1820–1830. doi: 10.2174/138945012804545533. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pommier Y. Drugging Topoisomerases: Lessons and Challenges. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013;8:82–95. doi: 10.1021/cb300648v. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kathiravan M.K., Kale A.N., Nilewar S. Discovery and Development of Topoisomerase Inhibitors as Anticancer Agents. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2016;16:1219–1229. doi: 10.2174/1389557516666160822110819. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms