Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;68(672):e449-e459.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X697649. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

Delivery and impact of the NHS Health Check in the first 8 years: a systematic review

Affiliations

Delivery and impact of the NHS Health Check in the first 8 years: a systematic review

Adam Martin et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Since 2009, all eligible persons in England have been entitled to an NHS Health Check. Uncertainty remains about who attends, and the health-related impacts.

Aim: To review quantitative evidence on coverage (the proportion of eligible individuals who attend), uptake (proportion of invitees who attend), and impact of NHS Health Checks.

Design and setting: A systematic review and quantitative data synthesis. Included were studies or data reporting coverage or uptake and studies reporting any health-related impact that used an appropriate comparison group or before- and-after study design.

Method: Eleven databases and additional internet sources were searched to November 2016.

Results: Twenty-six observational studies and one additional dataset were included. Since 2013, 45.6% of eligible individuals have received a health check. Coverage is higher among older people, those with a family history of coronary heart disease, those living in the most deprived areas, and some ethnic minority groups. Just under half (48.2%) of those invited have taken up the invitation. Data on uptake and impact (especially regarding health-related behaviours) are limited. Uptake is higher in older people and females, but lower in those living in the most deprived areas. Attendance is associated with small increases in disease detection, decreases in modelled cardiovascular disease risk, and increased statin and antihypertensive prescribing.

Conclusion: Published attendance, uptake, and prescribing rates are all lower than originally anticipated, and data on impact are limited, with very few studies reporting the effect of attendance on health-related behaviours. High-quality studies comparing matched attendees and non-attendees and health economic analyses are required.

Keywords: NHS Health Check; coverage; general practice; impact; primary care; systematic review; uptake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA diagram.

Comment in

References

    1. Department of Heath Announcement of health checks. 2009. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/... (accessed 22 May 2018)
    1. Public Health England. NHS Health Checks: applying All Our Health. 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-health-checks-applying-al... (accessed 22 May 2018)
    1. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012): the Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts) Atherosclerosis. 2012;223(1):1–68. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Package of essential noncommunicable (PEN) disease interventions for primary health care in low-resource settings. 2010. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44260/1/9789241598996_eng.pdf (accessed 22 May 2018) - PubMed
    1. Schuetz CA, Alperin P, Guda S, et al. A standardized vascular disease health check in Europe: a cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e66454. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms