Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752):20170122.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0122.

The multifaceted abstract brain

Affiliations
Review

The multifaceted abstract brain

Rutvik H Desai et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

concepts play a central role in human behaviour and constitute a critical component of the human conceptual system. Here, we investigate the neural basis of four types of abstract concepts, examining their similarities and differences through neuroimaging meta-analyses. We examine numerical and emotional concepts, and two higher-order abstract processes, morality judgements and theory of mind. Three main findings emerge. First, representation of abstract concepts is more widespread than is often assumed. Second, representations of different types of abstract concepts differ in important respects. Each of the domains examined here was associated with some unique areas. Third, some areas were commonly activated across domains and included inferior parietal, posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex. We interpret these regions in terms of their role in episodic recall, event representation and social-emotional processing. We suggest that different types of abstract concepts can be represented and grounded through differing contributions from event-based, interoceptive, introspective and sensory-motor representations. The results underscore the richness and diversity of abstract concepts, argue against single-mechanism accounts for representation of all types of abstract concepts and suggest mechanisms for their direct and indirect grounding.This article is part of the theme issue 'Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain'.

Keywords: abstract concepts; embodiment; emotions; events; numbers; semantics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Peaks from all contrasts used in the meta-analyses. Green—numbers, blue—emotion, red—morality, yellow—theory of mind.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Results of the meta-analysis showing significant ALE values within each domain, and overlap.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Results of the meta-analysis collapsing across all four abstract domains are shown in pink/purple. Activation from a meta-analysis of peaks from Binder et al. [15], after removing abstract peaks, is depicted in blue/purple, with purple showing the overlap between the two.

References

    1. Barsalou LW. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 617–645. (10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiefer M, Pulvermuller F. 2012. Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex 48, 805–825. (10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gallese V, Lakoff G. 2005. The brain's concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22, 455–479. (10.1080/02643290442000310) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meteyard L, Cuadrado SR, Bahrami B, Vigliocco G. 2012. Coming of age: a review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex 48, 788–804. (10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Binder JR, Desai RH. 2011. The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 527–536. (10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources