Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research
- PMID: 29915059
- PMCID: PMC6142277
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1711978115
Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research
Abstract
Only for ergodic processes will inferences based on group-level data generalize to individual experience or behavior. Because human social and psychological processes typically have an individually variable and time-varying nature, they are unlikely to be ergodic. In this paper, six studies with a repeated-measure design were used for symmetric comparisons of interindividual and intraindividual variation. Our results delineate the potential scope and impact of nonergodic data in human subjects research. Analyses across six samples (with 87-94 participants and an equal number of assessments per participant) showed some degree of agreement in central tendency estimates (mean) between groups and individuals across constructs and data collection paradigms. However, the variance around the expected value was two to four times larger within individuals than within groups. This suggests that literatures in social and medical sciences may overestimate the accuracy of aggregated statistical estimates. This observation could have serious consequences for how we understand the consistency between group and individual correlations, and the generalizability of conclusions between domains. Researchers should explicitly test for equivalence of processes at the individual and group level across the social and medical sciences.
Keywords: ecological fallacy; generalizability; idiographic science; replicability; research methodology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Reply to Adolf and Fried: Conditional equivalence and imperatives for person-level science.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6542-6543. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820221116. Epub 2019 Mar 14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. PMID: 30872468 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Ergodicity is sufficient but not necessary for group-to-individual generalizability.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6540-6541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818675116. Epub 2019 Mar 14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. PMID: 30872469 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reply to Hamaker and Ryan: Within-sample temporal instability in cross-sectional estimates.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6546-6547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820222116. Epub 2019 Mar 19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. PMID: 30890639 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A squared standard error is not a measure of individual differences.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6544-6545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818033116. Epub 2019 Mar 19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. PMID: 30890640 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Molenaar PCM. A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement. 2004;2:201–218.
-
- Molenaar PCM, Campbell CG. The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009;18:112–117.
-
- Quine WV. Natural Kinds. Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Springer; New York: 1969. pp. 5–23.
-
- Wilson EO. Consilience among the great branches of learning. Daedalus. 1998;127:131–149. - PubMed
-
- Carrier M. The Completeness of Scientific Theories: On the Derivation of Empirical Indicators Within a Theoretical Framework: The Case of Physical Geometry. Springer Science and Business Media; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2012.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
