Clinical Effect of Radiotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy for Non-Surgical Treatment of the Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- PMID: 29915168
- PMCID: PMC6040238
- DOI: 10.12659/MSM.910326
Clinical Effect of Radiotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy for Non-Surgical Treatment of the Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is widely accepted and is considered a standard treatment, particularly for unresectable and inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal use of the combined modalities of chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) remains controversial. In addition, no consensus has been reached regarding the exact efficacy of consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) and the most appropriate radiotherapy dose. MATERIAL AND METHODS Clinical data from 262 ESCC patients treated with CRT (n=165) or RT alone (n=97) were collected and reviewed. The long-term outcomes were analyzed, and treatment related acute toxicity reactions were compared. RESULTS The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 75.3%, 35.6%, and 25.3%, respectively, for the CRT group and 61.5%, 26.7%, and 17.6% for the RT-alone group (P=0.015). The concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) groups exhibited similar survival outcomes (for OS, P=0.568; for progression-free survival (PFS,) P=0.145). CCT after CCRT did not influence OS (P=0.236) but was associated with a more favorable PFS (P=0.020). In addition, high-dose of 60-65 Gy tended to prolong OS compared with low-dose (<60 Gy) or excessive-dose (>65 Gy). The incidence of adverse reactions, such as esophagitis and leukopenia, in the CRT group were significantly higher than in the RT-alone group (P=0.019, P=0.001, respectively), and no significant difference was observed between patients treated with CCRT and CCT after CCRT. CONCLUSIONS Treating non-surgical ESCC patients with CCRT conferred a significant survival benefit compared with RT alone. CCT after CCRT prolongs PFS but does not increase acute toxicity. High-dose (60-65 Gy) CCRT could generate more favorable survival outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Effect of modern high-dose versus standard-dose radiation in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on outcome of esophageal squamous cell cancer: a meta-analysis.Radiat Oncol. 2019 Oct 17;14(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1386-x. Radiat Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31623639 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consolidation Chemotherapy Provided Survival Benefit for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Who Underwent Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Lower Than 60 Gy.Thorac Cancer. 2025 Apr;16(7):e70012. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.70012. Thorac Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40176263 Free PMC article.
-
Survival Comparision of Three-dimensional Radiotherapy Alone vs. Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Arch Med Res. 2020 Jul;51(5):419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 May 14. Arch Med Res. 2020. PMID: 32418649
-
Chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy involving paclitaxel and carboplatin and in FIGO stage IIIB/IVA cervical cancer patients.J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jan;28(1):e15. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e15. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 27958682 Free PMC article.
-
Addition of Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy in Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone for Patients With Unresectable Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 13;11:665231. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.665231. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34589418 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The Prognostic Significance of Nomogram-Based Pretreatment Inflammatory Indicators in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy.Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748231185025. doi: 10.1177/10732748231185025. Cancer Control. 2023. PMID: 37339928 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Stratification by Tissue GAD1 Expression Level in Curatively Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2023 Nov-Dec;20(6):617-625. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20410. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2023. PMID: 37889064 Free PMC article.
-
Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Consolidation Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Front Oncol. 2022 May 23;12:813021. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.813021. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35677167 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of sex on the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer underwent definitive radiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.Radiat Oncol. 2019 May 2;14(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1278-0. Radiat Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31046792 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of modern high-dose versus standard-dose radiation in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on outcome of esophageal squamous cell cancer: a meta-analysis.Radiat Oncol. 2019 Oct 17;14(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1386-x. Radiat Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31623639 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Malhotra GK, Yanala U, Ravipati A, et al. Global trends in esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(5):564–79. - PubMed
-
- Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. 2013
-
- Chan A, Wong A. Is combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy equally effective as surgical resection in localized esophageal carcinoma? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45(2):265–70. - PubMed
-
- Hironaka S, Ohtsu A, Boku N, et al. Nonrandomized comparison between definitive chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in patients with T(2–3)N(any) M(0) squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(2):425–33. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials