Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018:20:103-142.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-89689-2_5.

RNA Degradation in Neurodegenerative Disease

Affiliations
Review

RNA Degradation in Neurodegenerative Disease

Kaitlin Weskamp et al. Adv Neurobiol. 2018.

Abstract

Ribonucleic acid (RNA) homeostasis is dynamically modulated in response to changing physiological conditions. Tight regulation of RNA abundance through both transcription and degradation determines the amount, timing, and location of protein translation. This balance is of particular importance in neurons, which are among the most metabolically active and morphologically complex cells in the body. As a result, any disruptions in RNA degradation can have dramatic consequences for neuronal health. In this chapter, we will first discuss mechanisms of RNA stabilization and decay. We will then explore how the disruption of these pathways can lead to neurodegenerative disease.

Keywords: Alternative splicing; Decay; Disease; Exosome; Neurodegeneration; RNA; Stress granule; Transport.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pathways responsible for RNA homeostasis. RNA stability is promoted by two key mechanisms (left). Following transcription, nascent RNA is stabilized by the addition of a 5’ cap and poly(A) tail, as well as the formation of secondary structures. Transcripts are also sequestered and stabilized in stress granules upon exposure to cellular stress. In contrast, RNA degradation pathways target faulty transcripts for removal (right). Transcripts that contain premature stop codons are targeted by nonsense-mediated decay. When translation fails to stop or start, the associated transcripts are degraded by nonstop decay and no-go decay, respectively. RNA decay mechanisms also regulate transcript abundance through several elements located within the 3’ UTR, including AU-rich elements, Staufen binding sites, miRNA recognition elements, and constitutive decay elements. Lastly, P-bodies sequester and destabilize RNA transcripts.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Abnormal RNA stability in neurodegenerative disease. Here we compare how normal pathways (left column) are disrupted in disease (right column). RNA Sequestration: There is constant flux between pools of RNA transcripts that are actively being translated (the polysome), those sequestered in stress granules, and those associated with P-bodies. In disease states, increased stress granule formation or reduced stress granule dissociation disrupts the equilibrium, resulting in fewer transcripts undergoing translation. Repeat Expansions and RNA Foci: Transcripts containing repeat expansions form secondary structures such as hairpin loops and G-quadruplexes that are often stabilized in nuclear foci, which also sequester RNA-binding proteins (green circles). These transcripts also generate proteins via RAN translation that can disrupt membraneless organelles involved in RNA splicing and processing. RNA Transport and the Exosome: Mutations in THO, Gle1, and other components of the RNA export pathway result in nuclear RNA retention and degradation via the exosome complex. Mutations in exosome components can inhibit RNA turnover and further disrupt RNA homeostasis. Alternative Splicing: Mutations that disrupt splice sites, or dysfunction of splicing regulators such as TDP43, result in the inclusion of unannotated or “cryptic” exons (pink). These transcripts are often targeted for nonsense-mediated decay. Retrotransposons: These transposable elements insert themselves into the genome, often disrupting open reading frames or splice sites. The transcripts that are transcribed from these regions are often faulty, and are targeted for RNA decay.

References

    1. Yang L, Duff MO, Graveley BR, Carmichael GG, Chen L-L. Genomewide characterization of non-polyadenylated RNAs. Genome Biol. 2011;12: R16. doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-2-r16 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guhaniyogi J, Brewer G. Regulation of mRNA stability in mammalian cells. Gene. 2001;265: 11–23. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11255003 - PubMed
    1. Gerstel B, Tuite MF, McCarthy JEG. The effects of 5′-capping, 3′-polyadenylation and leader composition upon the translation and stability of mRNA in a cell-free extract derived from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Microbiol. Wiley Online Library; 1992;6: 2339–2348. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01409.x/full - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huang Y, Carmichael GG. Role of polyadenylation in nucleocytoplasmic transport of mRNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16: 1534–1542. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8657127 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bienroth S, Keller W, Wahle E. Assembly of a processive messenger RNA polyadenylation complex. EMBO J. 1993;12: 585–594. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8440247 - PMC - PubMed