Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;143(2):619-630.e7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.05.032. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

IL-22 promotes allergic airway inflammation in epicutaneously sensitized mice

Affiliations

IL-22 promotes allergic airway inflammation in epicutaneously sensitized mice

Juan Manuel Leyva-Castillo et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Feb.

Erratum in

  • Corrigenda.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Oct;144(4):1142. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.07.026. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019. PMID: 31587795 No abstract available.
  • Corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Jul;150(1):233. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.05.004. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022. PMID: 35803689 No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Serum IL-22 levels are increased in patients with atopic dermatitis, which commonly precedes asthma in the atopic march. Epicutaneous sensitization in mice results in TH2-dominated skin inflammation that mimics atopic dermatitis and sensitizes the airways for antigen challenge-induced allergic inflammation characterized by the presence of both eosinophils and neutrophils. Epicutaneous sensitization results in increased serum levels of IL-22.

Objective: We sought to determine the role of IL-22 in antigen-driven airway allergic inflammation after inhalation challenge in epicutaneously sensitized mice.

Methods: Wild-type (WT) and Il22-/- mice were sensitized epicutaneously or immunized intraperitoneally with ovalbumin (OVA) and challenged intranasally with antigen. OVA T-cell receptor-specific T cells were TH22 polarized in vitro. Airway inflammation, mRNA levels in the lungs, and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) were examined.

Results: Epicutaneous sensitization preferentially elicited an IL-22 response compared with intraperitoneal immunization. Intranasal challenge of mice epicutaneously sensitized with OVA elicited in the lungs Il22 mRNA expression, IL-22 production, and accumulation of CD3+CD4+IL-22+ T cells that coexpressed IL-17A and TNF-α. Epicutaneously sensitized Il22-/- mice exhibited diminished eosinophil and neutrophil airway infiltration and decreased AHR after intranasal OVA challenge. Production of IL-13, IL-17A, and TNF-α was normal, but IFN-γ production was increased in lung cells from airway-challenged and epicutaneously sensitized Il22-/- mice. Intranasal instillation of IFN-γ-neutralizing antibody partially reversed the defect in eosinophil recruitment. WT recipients of TH22-polarized WT, but not IL-22-deficient, T-cell receptor OVA-specific T cells, which secrete both IL-17A and TNF-α, had neutrophil-dominated airway inflammation and AHR on intranasal OVA challenge. Intranasal instillation of IL-22 with TNF-α, but not IL-17A, elicited neutrophil-dominated airway inflammation and AHR in WT mice, suggesting that loss of IL-22 synergy with TNF-α contributed to defective recruitment of neutrophils into the airways of Il22-/- mice. TNF-α, but not IL-22, blockade at the time of antigen inhalation challenge inhibited airway inflammation in epicutaneously sensitized mice.

Conclusion: Epicutaneous sensitization promotes generation of antigen-specific IL-22-producing T cells that promote airway inflammation and AHR after antigen challenge, suggesting that IL-22 plays an important role in the atopic march.

Keywords: IL-22; asthma; atopic dermatitis; neutrophils.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. EC sensitization elicits a systemic IL-22 response and an antigen-specific IL-22 response in the lungs
A-B. IL-22 secretion by OVA stimulated splenocytes (A) and IL-22 serum levels (B). C,D. Il22 mRNA expression in the lungs (C), and IL-22 secretion by OVA stimulated lung cells (D). E. Representative FACS analysis and quantitation of intracelluar expression of IL-22+ cells among CD3+CD4+ T cells and of IL-17A+ and TNFα+ cells among CD3+CD4+IL-22+ cells in the lung. Mice were EC sensitized with OVA or saline in A and B, followed by i.n. challenged with OVA in C-F. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=5–10 per group). *p<0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2. EC sensitization preferentially promotes an IL-22 response
A-D. serum IL-22 levels (A), IL-22 secretion by OVA stimulated splenocytes (B), Il22 and Tnfa mRNA expression in the lungs (C) and IL-22 and TNFα secretion by OVA stimulated lung cells of mice EC or IP sensitized with OVA and i.n. challenged with OVA. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=3–5 per group). *p<0.05, **p<0.005 and ***p<0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3. IL-22 is important for the development of airway inflammation and AHR following intranasal antigen challenge of EC sensitized mice
A-D. Total and differential cell counts in BALF (A), H&E stained lung sections (B), and lung resistance in response to increasing doses of methacholine (C) and cytokine secretion by OVA stimulated lung cells (D) in WT and Il22/ mice EC sensitized with OVA or saline and i.n. challenged with OVA. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=4–7 per group). *p<0.05, **p<0.05, ***p<0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Increased IFNγ production underlies the decreased airway eosinophilia in inhalation challenged Il22/ mice EC sensitized with OVA
A, B. Ifng, Tbx21, Cxcr3 and Ccl5 mRNA levels in the lungs (A), Representative FACS analysis and quantitation of intracellular expression of IFNγ+ cells among CD3+LinC90+ cells, CD3+CD4+ T and CD3+CD8+ T cells in the lungs (B) of WT and Il22/ mice EC sensitized and intranasally challenged with OVA. C, D. Effect of i.n. administration of anti-IFNγ antibody, or isotype control, on the recruitments of eosinophils (C) and neutrophils (D) to the antigen challenged airways of Il22/ mice EC sensitized with OVA. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=5–7 per group). *p<0.05.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Th22 antigen-specific CD4+ T cells drive neutrophil-dominated airway inflammation and AHR in response to intranasal antigen challenge
A. Cytokine secretion by vitro polarized Th22 cells from in WT and Il22/ mice. B-F. Total and differential cell counts in BALF (B), frequency of neutrophils in lungs (C), H&E stained lung sections (D), chemokine mRNA levels in lungs (F), and lung resistance in response to increasing doses of methacholine (G) in WT recipients of Th22 polarized OVA-specific CD4+ T cells from DO11.10 and DO11.10/Il22/ mice following n. challenge with OVA. Mice that received no T cells were used as controls. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=4–6 per group). *p<0.05, **p<0.05, ***p<0.001.
Figure 6
Figure 6. IL-22 synergizes with TNFα to promote neutrophil airway inflammation
A-D. Total and differential counts in BALF (A), frequency of neutrophils in lungs (B), H&E stained lung sections (C), chemokine mRNA levels in the lungs (D) and lung resistance in response to increasing doses of methacholine (E) in WT mice treated intranasally with saline, rIL-22, rTNFα or rIL-22+rTNFα. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=4–6 per group). *p<0.05, **p<0.05, ***p<0.001
Figure 7
Figure 7. TNFα, but not IL-22 blockade during the challenge phase inhibits airway inflammation
A-D. Total and differential counts in BALF (A), Numbers of neutrophils in lungs (B), H&E staining of lung sections (C), chemokine mRNA levels in the lungs (D) in WT mice EC sensitized with OVA then subjected to i.n. instillation of OVA together with neutralizing anti-IL-22 IgG antibody, neutralizing anti-TNFα IgG antibody or IgG isotype controls. Bars represent mean±SEM (n=4–6 per group). *p<0.05, **p<0.05, ***p<0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pearce N, Ait-Khaled N, Beasley R, Mallol J, Keil U, Mitchell E, et al. Worldwide trends in the prevalence of asthma symptoms: phase III of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Thorax. 2007;62:758–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spergel JM, Paller AS. Atopic dermatitis and the atopic march. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112:S118–27. - PubMed
    1. Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1483–94. - PubMed
    1. Di Cesare A, Di Meglio P, Nestle FO. A role for Th17 cells in the immunopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis? J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128:2569–71. - PubMed
    1. Nograles KE, Zaba LC, Shemer A, Fuentes-Duculan J, Cardinale I, Kikuchi T, et al. IL-22-producing “T22” T cells account for upregulated IL-22 in atopic dermatitis despite reduced IL-17-producing TH17 T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123:1244–52. e2. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types