The impact of stapling technique and surgeon specialism on anastomotic failure after right-sided colorectal resection: an international multicentre, prospective audit
- PMID: 29920945
- DOI: 10.1111/codi.14308
The impact of stapling technique and surgeon specialism on anastomotic failure after right-sided colorectal resection: an international multicentre, prospective audit
Abstract
Aim: There is little evidence to support choice of technique and configuration for stapled anastomoses after right hemicolectomy and ileocaecal resection. This study aimed to determine the relationship between stapling technique and anastomotic failure.
Method: Any unit performing gastrointestinal surgery was invited to contribute data on consecutive adult patients undergoing right hemicolectomy or ileocolic resection to this prospective, observational, international, multicentre study. Patients undergoing stapled, side-to-side ileocolic anastomoses were identified and multilevel, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to explore factors associated with anastomotic leak.
Results: One thousand three hundred and forty-seven patients were included from 200 centres in 32 countries. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 8.3%. Upon multivariate analysis there was no difference in leak rate with use of a cutting stapler for apical closure compared with a noncutting stapler (8.4% vs 8.0%, OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.54-1.53, P = 0.72). Oversewing of the apical staple line, whether in the cutting group (7.9% vs 9.7%, OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.52-1.46, P = 0.60) or noncutting group (8.9% vs 5.7%, OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.46-4.23, P = 0.55) also conferred no benefit in terms of reducing leak rates. Surgeons reporting to be general surgeons had a significantly higher leak rate than those reporting to be colorectal surgeons (12.1% vs 7.3%, OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.04-2.64, P = 0.04).
Conclusion: This study did not identify any difference in anastomotic leak rates according to the type of stapling device used to close the apical aspect. In addition, oversewing of the anastomotic staple lines appears to confer no benefit in terms of reducing leak rates. Although general surgeons operated on patients with more high-risk characteristics than colorectal surgeons, a higher leak rate for general surgeons which remained after risk adjustment needs further exploration.
Keywords: Bowel anastomosis; Crohn's disease; anastomotic leak; colorectal cancer; epidemiology; international; oversewn; stapler; surgery; surgical technique.
Colorectal Disease © 2018 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Similar articles
-
Anastomotic leak after manual circular stapled left-sided bowel surgery: analysis of technology-, disease-, and patient-related factors.BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5):zrae089. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae089. BJS Open. 2024. PMID: 39441693 Free PMC article.
-
Individual surgeon is an independent risk factor for leak after double-stapled colorectal anastomosis: An institutional analysis of 800 patients.Surgery. 2017 Nov;162(5):1006-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 Jul 21. Surgery. 2017. PMID: 28739093
-
Increased Leak Rates Following Stapled Versus Handsewn Ileocolic Anastomosis in Patients with Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 May;62(5):542-548. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001289. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019. PMID: 30489322
-
Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Nov;23(11):1093-1095. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02105-8. Epub 2019 Nov 15. Tech Coloproctol. 2019. PMID: 31729620
-
Circular staplers and anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: meta-analysis.BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2):zrae170. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae170. BJS Open. 2025. PMID: 40200762 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Editorial: Colorectal surgery and proctology: past, present, and future.Front Surg. 2024 Feb 1;11:1373867. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1373867. eCollection 2024. Front Surg. 2024. PMID: 38371881 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Ileocolic Anastomoses.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2022 Dec 9;36(1):5-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757786. eCollection 2023 Jan. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2022. PMID: 36619280 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New understanding of gut microbiota and colorectal anastomosis leak: A collaborative review of the current concepts.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Nov 1;12:1022603. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1022603. eCollection 2022. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 36389160 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries.Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1):znad370. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad370. Br J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38029386 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Anastomotic leak after manual circular stapled left-sided bowel surgery: analysis of technology-, disease-, and patient-related factors.BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5):zrae089. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae089. BJS Open. 2024. PMID: 39441693 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources