Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in free-response detection-localization tasks using ROC tools
- PMID: 29921163
- DOI: 10.1177/0962280218776683
Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in free-response detection-localization tasks using ROC tools
Abstract
Diagnostic systems designed to detect possibly multiple lesions per patient (e.g. multiple polyps during CT colonoscopy) are often evaluated in "free-response" studies that allow for diagnostic responses unconstrained in their number and locations. Analysis of free-response studies requires extensions of the traditional receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, which are termed free-response ROC (FROC) methodology. Despite substantial developments in this area, FROC tools and approaches are much more cumbersome than traditional ROC methods. Alternative approaches that use well-known ROC tools (e.g. ROI-ROC) require defining and physically delineating regions of interest (ROI) and combine FROC data within ROIs. We propose an approach that allows analyzing FROC data using conventional ROC tools without delineating the actual ROIs or reducing data. The design parameters of FROC study are used to make FROC data analyzable using ROC tools and to calibrate the corresponding FROC and ROC curves on both conceptual and numerical levels. Differences in the performance indices of the nonparametric FROC and the new approach are shown to be asymptotically negligible and typically rather small in practice. Data from a large multi-reader study of colon cancer detection are used to illustrate the new approach.
Keywords: Detection and localization accuracy; ROC; clustered data; free-response; regions of interest (ROI).
Similar articles
-
Data analysis for detection and localization of multiple abnormalities with application to mammography.Acad Radiol. 2000 Jul;7(7):516-25. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(00)80324-4. Acad Radiol. 2000. PMID: 10902960
-
Optimization and FROC analysis of rule-based detection schemes using a multiobjective approach.IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Dec;17(6):1089-93. doi: 10.1109/42.746726. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998. PMID: 10048867
-
Nonparametric signal detectability evaluation using an exponential transformation of the FROC curve.Med Phys. 2011 Oct;38(10):5690-702. doi: 10.1118/1.3633938. Med Phys. 2011. PMID: 21992384
-
Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy.Am J Med. 2007 Mar;120(3):203-210.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.05.061. Am J Med. 2007. PMID: 17349438 Review.
-
[CT colonography in daily practice].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(44):A6477. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013. PMID: 24168847 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Development of an immune-related prognostic index associated with hepatocellular carcinoma.Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Mar 19;12(6):5010-5030. doi: 10.18632/aging.102926. Epub 2020 Mar 19. Aging (Albany NY). 2020. PMID: 32191631 Free PMC article.
-
Presenting artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning studies to clinicians and healthcare stakeholders: an introductory reference with a guideline and a Clinical AI Research (CAIR) checklist proposal.Acta Orthop. 2021 Oct;92(5):513-525. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1918389. Epub 2021 May 14. Acta Orthop. 2021. PMID: 33988081 Free PMC article.
-
Developing breast lesion detection algorithms for digital breast tomosynthesis: Leveraging false positive findings.Med Phys. 2022 Dec;49(12):7596-7608. doi: 10.1002/mp.15883. Epub 2022 Aug 19. Med Phys. 2022. PMID: 35916103 Free PMC article.
-
Multicenter Multireader Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Attention Mapping System for the Detection of Prostate Cancer With Multiparametric MRI.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Oct;215(4):903-912. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22573. Epub 2020 Aug 5. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020. PMID: 32755355 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources