Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):146.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1257-4.

The importance of scientific competencies in German medical curricula - the student perspective

Affiliations

The importance of scientific competencies in German medical curricula - the student perspective

Antonius Ratte et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Scientific competencies are of great importance for physicians; not only for conducting reliable research, but also for patient care. However, there is growing concern that a lack of scientific competencies among physicians may lead to a deterioration in the quality on biomedical research. This study aims at assessing medical students' perspectives on the implementation of scientific competency training in German medical curricula.

Methods: An online survey was conducted in order to collect German medical students' opinions on the importance of acquiring scientific competencies during their medical studies and to provide us with an assessment of their current levels of basic scientific competencies by having them conduct a self-evaluation. Moreover, we wanted to understand their perceptions of current curricular content and to receive suggestions for improving scientific competency training. Participants were reached via the mailing lists of the German Medical Students' Association, as well as of local medical student committees, and the German Medical Students' Associations social media channel on Facebook.

Results: In total, 2380 medical students from across all 37 German medical faculties participated in the survey. The majority of students agreed that the ability to critically evaluate the relevant literature is an important competency for physicians, and that every student should conduct a research project during their medical studies. However, the students evaluated their scientific competencies as unsatisfactory, especially with regard to statistics and scientific writing. They were strongly in favor of receiving extended research training.

Conclusion: Our study provides insight into German medical students' self-perception in relation to both patient care and biomedical research, and makes recommendations for potential improvements in scientific training. The study demonstrates that scientific competencies are of great importance to medical students in Germany. Students are not lacking motivation for scientific practice and have numerous ideas for enhancing scientific teaching opportunities. Scientific training should follow a holistic approach based on three pillars: (i) a scientific core curriculum, (ii) intracurricular research projects, and (iii) special research programs for students strongly interested in medical research.

Keywords: German medical training; Medical curriculum; Research skills; Scientific competencies; Scientific training; Student research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ information

Antonius Ratte, Simon Drees and Tabea Schmidt-Ott are medical students from Heidelberg, Berlin and Oldenburg respectively. Together they chaired the German Medical Students’ Association’s standing committee on medical education from 2014 to 2015. Holding this position they performed the present study.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Since the survey was performed anonymously and did not involve an intervention, the Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg indicated that no formal ethics approval was required. Consent to participate was assumed by the completion of the survey.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The students’ opinion on the importance of scientific competencies for physicians. Agreement on a 4 point Likert-type scale, n per item is specified in parentheses
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a The students’ opinion about the current system of medical education in Germany regarding the impartation of scientific competencies and medical doctoral degrees in Germany. Agreement on a 4 point Likert-type scale, n per item is specified in parentheses. b Agreement with the statement “Physicians should obtain a doctorate” of students in lower semesters (≤6 semesters) compared with students in higher semesters (≥7 semesters)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a The students’ self-evaluation of selected scientific competencies on a 4 point Likert-type scale, n per item is specified in parentheses. b, c Comparison of the self-evaluation of male vs. female participants and students with previous experience in research vs. students without previous experience. The self-evaluation score that is plotted on the Y axis summarizes the 4 self-evaluation items that are shown in (a). Boxes displays the first to third quartile, whiskers range from 5th to 95th percentile, lines within the boxes indicate the median
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Students’ recommendations on the amount of teaching in nine proposed curricular contents. Evaluation on a 5 point Likert-type scale, n per item is specified in parentheses

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Federation for Medical Education. Basic Medical Education: WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement. 2015. http://wfme.org/standards/bme/78-new-version-2012-quality-improvement-in.... Accessed 30 Sep 2016.
    1. World Federation for Medical Education. WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement in Medical Education: European Specifications. 2007. http://wfme.org/standards/european-specifications/21-european-specificat.... Accessed 30 Sep 2016.
    1. World Federation for Medical Education. Postgraduate Medical Education WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement. 2015. http://wfme.org/standards/pgme/97-final-2015-revision-of-postgraduate-me.... Accessed 30 Sep 2016.
    1. Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W, Kurz-Milcke E, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics: toward an evidence-based society. Psychol Sci Public Interes. 2007;8:53–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tambe J, Minkande JZ, Moifo B, Mbu R, Ongolo-Zogo P, Gonsu J. Students’ perspectives on research and assessment of a model template designed to guide beginners in research in a medical school in Cameroon. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:269. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0269-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed