The importance of scientific competencies in German medical curricula - the student perspective
- PMID: 29921261
- PMCID: PMC6006583
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1257-4
The importance of scientific competencies in German medical curricula - the student perspective
Abstract
Background: Scientific competencies are of great importance for physicians; not only for conducting reliable research, but also for patient care. However, there is growing concern that a lack of scientific competencies among physicians may lead to a deterioration in the quality on biomedical research. This study aims at assessing medical students' perspectives on the implementation of scientific competency training in German medical curricula.
Methods: An online survey was conducted in order to collect German medical students' opinions on the importance of acquiring scientific competencies during their medical studies and to provide us with an assessment of their current levels of basic scientific competencies by having them conduct a self-evaluation. Moreover, we wanted to understand their perceptions of current curricular content and to receive suggestions for improving scientific competency training. Participants were reached via the mailing lists of the German Medical Students' Association, as well as of local medical student committees, and the German Medical Students' Associations social media channel on Facebook.
Results: In total, 2380 medical students from across all 37 German medical faculties participated in the survey. The majority of students agreed that the ability to critically evaluate the relevant literature is an important competency for physicians, and that every student should conduct a research project during their medical studies. However, the students evaluated their scientific competencies as unsatisfactory, especially with regard to statistics and scientific writing. They were strongly in favor of receiving extended research training.
Conclusion: Our study provides insight into German medical students' self-perception in relation to both patient care and biomedical research, and makes recommendations for potential improvements in scientific training. The study demonstrates that scientific competencies are of great importance to medical students in Germany. Students are not lacking motivation for scientific practice and have numerous ideas for enhancing scientific teaching opportunities. Scientific training should follow a holistic approach based on three pillars: (i) a scientific core curriculum, (ii) intracurricular research projects, and (iii) special research programs for students strongly interested in medical research.
Keywords: German medical training; Medical curriculum; Research skills; Scientific competencies; Scientific training; Student research.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors’ information
Antonius Ratte, Simon Drees and Tabea Schmidt-Ott are medical students from Heidelberg, Berlin and Oldenburg respectively. Together they chaired the German Medical Students’ Association’s standing committee on medical education from 2014 to 2015. Holding this position they performed the present study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Since the survey was performed anonymously and did not involve an intervention, the Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg indicated that no formal ethics approval was required. Consent to participate was assumed by the completion of the survey.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures




Similar articles
-
The scientific term paper at the Charité: a project report on concept, implementation, and students' evaluation and learning.GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Oct 15;36(5):Doc53. doi: 10.3205/zma001261. eCollection 2019. GMS J Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 31815163 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual and gender minority health in medical curricula in new England: a pilot study of medical student comfort, competence and perception of curricula.Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1461513. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1461513. Med Educ Online. 2018. PMID: 29717635 Free PMC article.
-
Scientific competence during medical education - insights from a cross-sectional study at a German Medical School.BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 28;24(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05470-7. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38807084 Free PMC article.
-
["Practical clinical competence" - a joint programme to improve training in surgery].Zentralbl Chir. 2013 Dec;138(6):663-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328180. Epub 2013 Apr 10. Zentralbl Chir. 2013. PMID: 23575519 Review. German.
-
A scoping review of the changing landscape of geriatric medicine in undergraduate medical education: curricula, topics and teaching methods.Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Jun;13(3):513-528. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00595-0. Epub 2022 Jan 1. Eur Geriatr Med. 2022. PMID: 34973151 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Factors affecting the scientific research ability and the corresponding countermeasures in clinical postgraduates.BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 5;23(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04261-w. BMC Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 37143064 Free PMC article.
-
Portuguese Medical Students' Interest for Science and Research Declines after Freshman Year.Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 12;9(10):1357. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101357. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34683037 Free PMC article.
-
Practical guide for the use of medical evidence in scientific publication: Recommendations for the medical student: Narrative review.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Oct 9;71:102932. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102932. eCollection 2021 Nov. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021. PMID: 34659747 Free PMC article. Review.
-
We know but we hope: A qualitative study of the opinions and experiences on the inclusion of management, health economics and research in the medical curriculum.PLoS One. 2022 Oct 21;17(10):e0276512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276512. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36269759 Free PMC article.
-
The scientific term paper at the Charité: a project report on concept, implementation, and students' evaluation and learning.GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Oct 15;36(5):Doc53. doi: 10.3205/zma001261. eCollection 2019. GMS J Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 31815163 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Federation for Medical Education. Basic Medical Education: WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement. 2015. http://wfme.org/standards/bme/78-new-version-2012-quality-improvement-in.... Accessed 30 Sep 2016.
-
- World Federation for Medical Education. WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement in Medical Education: European Specifications. 2007. http://wfme.org/standards/european-specifications/21-european-specificat.... Accessed 30 Sep 2016.
-
- World Federation for Medical Education. Postgraduate Medical Education WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement. 2015. http://wfme.org/standards/pgme/97-final-2015-revision-of-postgraduate-me.... Accessed 30 Sep 2016.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical