An integrated 2-year clinical skills peer tutoring scheme in a UK-based medical school: perceptions of tutees and peer tutors
- PMID: 29922105
- PMCID: PMC5996860
- DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S159502
An integrated 2-year clinical skills peer tutoring scheme in a UK-based medical school: perceptions of tutees and peer tutors
Abstract
Background: Several benefits of peer tutoring in medical school teaching have been described. However, there is a lack of research on the perceptions of peer tutoring, particularly from tutees who partake in a long-term clinical skills scheme integrated into the medical school curriculum. This study evaluates the opinions of preclinical tutees at the end of a 2-year peer-tutored clinical skills program and peer tutors themselves.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a UK-based medical school that primarily utilizes peer tutoring for clinical skills teaching. A questionnaire was designed to assess the views of preclinical tutees and peer tutors. Likert scales were used to grade responses and comment boxes to collect qualitative data.
Results: Sixty-five questionnaires were collected (52 tutees, 13 peer tutors). Seventy-nine percent of students felt satisfied with their teaching, and 70% felt adequately prepared for clinical placements. Furthermore, 79% believed that peer tutoring is the most effective method for clinical skills teaching. When compared to faculty teaching, tutees preferred being taught by peer tutors (63%), felt more confident (73%), and were more willing to engage (77%). All peer tutors felt that teaching made them more confident in their Objective Structured Clinical Examination performance, and 91% agreed that being a tutor made them consider pursuing teaching in the future. Thematic analysis of qualitative data identified 3 themes regarding peer tutoring: a more comfortable environment (69%), a more personalized teaching approach (34%), and variation in content taught (14%).
Conclusion: Preclinical tutees prefer being taught clinical skills by peer tutors compared to faculty, with the peer tutors also benefitting. Studies such as this, looking at long-term schemes, further validate peer tutoring and may encourage more medical schools to adopt this method as an effective way of clinical skills teaching.
Keywords: OSCE; curriculum; learning; near-peer; peer-assisted; teaching.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures



Comment in
-
Peer tutoring scheme: a medical student's perspective.Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 Aug 29;9:605-606. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S178365. eCollection 2018. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018. PMID: 30214372 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Wagner L. Peer teaching: historical perspectives [Internet] Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; 1982. [Accessed April 25, 2018]. p. 266. [cited February 16, 2018. (Contributions to the study of education no. 5. Available from: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000310721.
-
- Secomb J. A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(6):703–716. - PubMed
-
- Ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):591–599. - PubMed
-
- Walker-Bartnick LA, Berger JH, Kappelman MM. A model for peer tutoring in the medical school setting. J Med Educ. 1984;59(4):309–315. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources