Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;10(1):60-64.

Effectiveness of Topical Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream for Pain Control During Femoral Artery Catheterization in Adult Patients: A Prospective Study

Adnan I Qureshi  1 , Muhammad A Saleem  1   2 , Nishath Naseem  1 , Emrah Aytac  1 , Cetin Kursad Akpinar  1 , Shawn S Wallery  1
Affiliations

Effectiveness of Topical Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream for Pain Control During Femoral Artery Catheterization in Adult Patients: A Prospective Study

Adnan I Qureshi et al. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To test the effectiveness of topical EMLA cream (lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) for pain control during femoral artery catheterization for neuro-endovascular procedures in adult patients.

Methods: The body habitus overlying the femoral arterial pulsation was graded as: (1) pubic symphysis and iliac crest bone protuberances visualized; (2) Pubic Symphysis and Iliac Crest bone protuberances not seen but easily palpable; (3) Pubic Symphysis and Iliac Crest bone protuberances palpable with considerable difficulty; and (4) abdominal layers fold over the femoral region. The severity of pain at femoral artery catheterization was classified using a numeric rating scale score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with excellent (score of ≤1) and failed pain control (score of ≥8).

Results: The mean (±SD) and median numeric rating scale scores were 2.4 ± 2.7 and 1, respectively, in 186 patients included. The proportion of patients with excellent pain control was 49.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 42.1%-56.7%] and failed pain control was 6.9% (95% CI 4.1%-11.6%). The body habitus was graded as 1 (n = 31), 2 (n = 61), 3 (n = 48), and 4 (n = 46). In multivariate analysis, grade 4 body habitus [odds ratio (OR) 1.8; 95% CI 1.3-2.9], grade 4 ease of cannulation (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.2-2.7), and previous femoral artery catheterization (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.8-4.2) were independent predictors of failed pain control. Grade 1 ease of cannulation (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2-3.1) independently predicted excellent pain control.

Conclusion: Topical EMLA cream as an adjunct to local lidocaine infiltration was associated with very low rates of failed pain control during femoral artery catheterization despite a relatively high rate of unfavorable body habitus.

Keywords: Femoral artery catheterization; analgesia; lidocaine; pain; prilocaine; topical anesthetic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta radiol. 1953;39(5):368–376. - PubMed
    1. Heger N, et al. Percutaneous catheter-arteriographies: Seldinger technique. Minn Med. 1970;53(10):1093–1097. - PubMed
    1. Spiliopoulos S, et al. Does ultrasound-guided lidocaine injection improve local anaesthesia before femoral artery catheterization? Clin Radiol. 2011;66(5):449–455. - PubMed
    1. Joly LM, et al. Topical lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) versus local infiltration anesthesia for radial artery cannulation. Anesth Analg. 1998;87(2):403–406. - PubMed
    1. Pirat A, et al. Topical EMLA cream versus prilocaine infiltration for pediatric cardiac catheterization. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;19(5):642–645. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources