Direct disk testing versus isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of urine from urinary tract infection
- PMID: 29922417
- PMCID: PMC6004629
Direct disk testing versus isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of urine from urinary tract infection
Abstract
Background and objectives: Urinary tract infections are common infections that can be caused by many bacterial pathogens. The susceptibility of such pathogens to antimicrobial agents is identified by different methods including disk diffusion test, direct sensitivity testing and determination minimum inhibitory concentration. The present study was conducted to isolate and identify bacteria cultured from urine samples and compare the results of direct sensitivity test (DST) against Kirby-Bauer's disk diffusion antimicrobial sensitivity (AST) with respect to reliability, time and cost.
Materials and methods: Midstream urine samples were inoculated on blood and MacConkey agar plates; growth was evaluated after colony counting. We identified isolates based on their cultural and biochemical properties, and Vitek® 2 system. Both DST and AST were performed on Mueller-Hinton agar using 10 antimicrobial agents. Error rate was calculated between the DST and AST as the proportion of comparisons between DST and AST test results. The comparisons represented as "very major error", "major error", or "minor error" and "agreement" (i.e, no error).
Results: We tested 373 urine samples, of them 257 (68.9%) were from females and 116 (31.1%) from males. Primary cultivation detected growth (>105 cfu/mL) from 206 (55.23%) samples; Gram-negative isolates were the most common isolates; these included Escherichia coli (111, 51.87%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (19, 8.88%), while Staphylococcus aureus (14, 6.54%) was the main Gram-positive isolate. From the 1940 individual comparisons of DST and AST of single (pure) bacterial isolates, 12 comparisons (0.6%) represented very major errors, 9 (0.5%) major errors, 36 (1.8%) minor errors, and 1883 comparisons (97.1%) were in agreement.
Conclusion: E. coli was the most common isolate. Cefixime and cefpodoxime were found to be the most ineffective antimicrobial agents, while meropenem and nitrofurantoin were the most effective agents against all isolated urinary pathogens. DST and AST almost give the same results in pure cultures, and direct antimicrobial susceptibility for urine specimens can safely replace standard antimicrobial susceptibility in urinary tract infection.
Keywords: Antimicrobial; Direct sensitivity testing; Urinary tract infection.
Similar articles
-
Performance and clinical significance of direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing on urine from hospitalized patients.Scand J Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;43(10):771-6. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2011.588609. Epub 2011 Jun 22. Scand J Infect Dis. 2011. PMID: 21696255
-
Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing for acute urinary tract infections in women.J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2316-23. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2316-2323.1995. J Clin Microbiol. 1995. PMID: 7494020 Free PMC article.
-
The sensitivities to first-line antibiotic therapy of the common urinary tract bacterial infections detected in urine samples at a hospital in metropolitan Kampala (Uganda).Afr Health Sci. 2007 Dec;7(4):214-22. Afr Health Sci. 2007. PMID: 21499486 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Urinary Tract Pathogens by Direct Analysis of Urine Samples Using a MALDI-TOF MS-Based Combined Protocol.Front Microbiol. 2019 Jun 5;10:1182. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01182. eCollection 2019. Front Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 31231323 Free PMC article.
-
Bacterial profile and drug susceptibility pattern of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at University of Gondar Teaching Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.BMC Res Notes. 2012 Apr 25;5:197. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-197. BMC Res Notes. 2012. PMID: 22534117 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Direct Urine Resistance Detection Using VITEK 2.Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 May 15;11(5):663. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050663. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35625307 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular identification and antimicrobial resistance patterns of enterobacterales in community urinary tract infections among indigenous women in Ecuador: addressing microbiological misidentification.BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1195. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10096-7. BMC Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 39438815 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stamm WE, Norrby SR. Urinary tract infections: disease panorama and challenges. J Infect Dis 2001;183 Suppl 1:S1–4. - PubMed
-
- Foxman B. Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2014;28:1–13. - PubMed
-
- Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, Colgan R, Geerlings SE, Rice JC, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50:625–663. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources