Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Dec;29(4):741-749.
doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0701-5. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

Iterative Algorithms Applied to Treated Intracranial Aneurysms

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Iterative Algorithms Applied to Treated Intracranial Aneurysms

Aikaterini Fitsiori et al. Clin Neuroradiol. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the impact of iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) on artifacts related to neurosurgical clips or endovascular coils when combined to filtered back projection (FBP) or advanced modelled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE).

Material and methods: In this study 21 unenhanced brain computed tomography (CT) examinations were reconstructed with FBP and level 2 of ADMIRE, both techniques with and without iMAR algorithm, resulting in 4 series per acquisition. Subjective assessment of artifact reduction was performed as a double-blinded evaluation with a 5-point-scale. Objective analysis was performed by comparing central tendencies and distributions of voxel densities. The central tendency was assessed as the mean voxel density in Hounsfield units. The distribution was assessed by evaluating the shape and asymmetry of the histograms of voxels densities with measures of kurtosis and skewness, respectively.

Results: Inter-reader agreement was excellent (>0.8). FBP and ADMIRE without iMAR were scored 4 and with iMAR 5. Unusual artifacts were noted in all of the series reconstructed with iMAR, especially when combined with ADMIRE. Kurtosis revealed statistical differences for all reconstruction techniques (p ≤ 0.0007) except for the association of FBP with iMAR (p = 0.2211) for the coiling population and skewness demonstrated no statistical difference in any population (p ≥ 0.0558), confirming the subjective analysis results, except for the ADMIRE algorithm with or without iMAR (p ≤ 0.0342) in the coiling population.

Conclusion: iMAR led to the reduction in artifacts due to intracranial metallic devices. However, it created a new artifact in the form of a halo of photon-starvation, especially when combined with ADMIRE. The combination of FBP and iMAR seems more suitable, combining the beneficial metal artifact reduction without the emergence of a halo of photon starvation just around the point of interest.

Keywords: Artifacts; Computed tomography (CT); Computer-assisted algorithms; Intracranial aneurysm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Radiol. 2017 Feb;90(1070):20160634 - PubMed
    1. World Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;84(5):1362-71 - PubMed
    1. Acta Radiol. 2014 Oct;55(8):1015-23 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2011 Oct;21(10):2193-201 - PubMed
    1. Stroke. 2000 Nov;31(11):2742-50 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources