Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
- PMID: 29924056
- PMCID: PMC6023662
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011253
Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic inspection of colonic mucosa is disturbed by colonic folds and peristalsis, which may result in missed polyps. Cimetropium bromide, an antispasmodic agent, inhibits peristalsis and colonic spasms, which may improve polyp detection. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate whether cimetropium bromide could improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon.
Methods: Patients undergoing screening or diagnostic colonoscopy were randomized to receive intravenous cimetropium bromide (5 mg) or placebo after cecal intubation. The primary outcomes were the number of polyps per patient (PPP) and adenomas per patient (APP); secondary outcomes were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and advanced neoplasm detection rate (ANDR).
Results: A total of 181 patients were analyzed; 91 patients received cimetropium bromide and 90 patients received placebo. Cimetropium bromide and placebo groups did not significantly differ in the PPP and APP for the colorectum (1.38 ± 1.58 vs 1.69 ± 2.28, P = .298; 0.96 ± 1.27 vs 1.11 ± 1.89, P = .517, respectively) and right colon (0.70 ± 0.95 vs 0.78 ± 1.21, P = .645; 0.47 ± 0.81 vs 0.51 ± 0.81, P = .757, respectively). Two groups also did not significantly differ in the PDR, ADR, and ANDR for the colorectum and right colon. Furthermore, there were no difference between groups in the PPP, APP, PDR, ADR, and ADNR in a sub-analysis of expert and non-expert endoscopists.
Conclusions: Cimetropium bromide did not improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon during colonoscope withdrawal, regardless of the expertness of the endoscopist. However, its use may be helpful in patients with active peristalsis or for beginning endoscopists during standard colonoscopy without a transparent cap.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Hyoscine N-butylbromide does not improve polyp detection during colonoscopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Apr;75(4):835-40. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Feb 7. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22317882 Clinical Trial.
-
Retrograde inspection vs standard forward view for the detection of colorectal adenomas during colonoscopy: A back-to-back randomized clinical trial.World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 28;26(16):1962-1970. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1962. World J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32390706 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 28;21(20):6261-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6261. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26034361 Free PMC article.
-
Advanced technology for the improvement of adenoma and polyp detection during colonoscopy.Dig Endosc. 2015 Apr;27 Suppl 1:40-4. doi: 10.1111/den.12428. Dig Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25556542 Review.
-
Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 7;20(9):2200-11. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2200. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24605019 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Optimizing Screening Colonoscopy: Strategies and Alternatives.Visc Med. 2019 Aug;35(4):215-225. doi: 10.1159/000501835. Epub 2019 Jul 9. Visc Med. 2019. PMID: 31602382 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Manser CN, Bachmann LM, Brunner J, et al. Colonoscopy screening markedly reduces the occurrence of colon carcinomas and carcinoma-related death: a closed cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:110–7. - PubMed
-
- Huang Y, Gong W, Su B, et al. Risk and cause of interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polypectomy. Digestion 2012;86:148–54. - PubMed
-
- Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24–8. - PubMed
-
- Villavicencio RT, Rex DK. Colonic adenomas: prevalence and incidence rates, growth rates, and miss rates at colonoscopy. Semin Gastrointest Dis 2000;11:185–93. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous