Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Mar 14;74(4):582-587.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly094.

A Frailty Index for UK Biobank Participants

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A Frailty Index for UK Biobank Participants

Dylan M Williams et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Frailty indices (FIs) measure variation in health between aging individuals. Researching FIs in resources with large-scale genetic and phenotypic data will provide insights into the causes and consequences of frailty. Thus, we aimed to develop an FI using UK Biobank data, a cohort study of 500,000 middle-aged and older adults.

Methods: An FI was calculated using 49 self-reported questionnaire items on traits covering health, presence of diseases and disabilities, and mental well-being, according to standard protocol. We used multiple imputation to derive FI values for the entire eligible sample in the presence of missing item data (N = 500,336). To validate the measure, we assessed associations of the FI with age, sex, and risk of all-cause mortality (follow-up ≤ 9.7 years) using linear and Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Results: Mean FI in the cohort was 0.125 (SD = 0.075), and there was a curvilinear trend toward higher values in older participants. FI values were also marginally higher on average in women than in men. In survival models, 10% higher baseline frailty (ie, a 0.1 FI increment) was associated with higher risk of death (hazard ratio = 1.65; 95% confidence interval: 1.62-1.68). Associations were stronger in younger participants than in older participants, and in men than in women (hazard ratios: 1.72 vs. 1.56, respectively).

Conclusions: The FI is a valid measure of frailty in UK Biobank. The cohort's data are open access for researchers to use, and we provide script for deriving this tool to facilitate future studies on frailty.

Keywords: Biological aging; Frailty; Longevity; Mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of frailty index (FI) values by age at baseline (N = 500,336).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Survival curves according to baseline age and frailty index (FI) categories, after ≤9.7 years of follow-up (N = 500,336). The age scale shows risk of mortality within the follow-up period according to the age at which individuals entered the cohort and their baseline FI category. For example, the average probability of survival after 9.7 years for a 70-year-old individual in the lowest FI category was approximately 90%.

References

    1. Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. ScientificWorldJournal. 2001;1:323–336. doi:10.1100/tsw.2001.58 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr. 2008;8:24. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-8-24 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A. A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:738–743. doi:10.1093/gerona/62.7.738 - PubMed
    1. Rogers NT, Steptoe A, Cadar D. Frailty is an independent predictor of incident dementia: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15746. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16104-y - PMC - PubMed
    1. Samper-Ternent R, Karmarkar A, Graham J, Reistetter T, Ottenbacher K. Frailty as a predictor of falls in older Mexican Americans. J Aging Health. 2012;24:641–653. doi:10.1177/0898264311428490 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types