Characterization of the Spatial and Temporal Dispersion Differences Between Exhaled E-Cigarette Mist and Cigarette Smoke
- PMID: 29924352
- PMCID: PMC6751519
- DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty121
Characterization of the Spatial and Temporal Dispersion Differences Between Exhaled E-Cigarette Mist and Cigarette Smoke
Abstract
Introduction: There are fundamental differences between electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and conventional cigarette product categories with regards to potential environmental exposures, notably that e-cigarettes do not contain tobacco or generate side-stream emissions. Here we assess the spatial and temporal patterns of exhaled e-cigarette aerosol at a bystander's position, and compare it with conventional cigarette smoke emissions.
Methods: Smokers were asked to use e-cigarettes or smoke conventional cigarettes in a room-simulating chamber. Volunteers used the products at different distances from a heated mannequin, representing a bystander, and under different room ventilation rates. Aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions at the bystander's position were measured.
Results: For both product categories, the particle concentrations registered following each puff were in the same order of magnitude. However, for e-cigarettes the particle concentration returned rapidly to background values within seconds; for conventional cigarettes it increased with successive puffs, returning to background levels after 30-45 minutes. Unlike for the e-cigarette devices tested, such temporal variation was dependent on the room ventilation rate. Particle size measurements showed that exhaled e-cigarette particles were smaller than those emitted during smoking conventional cigarettes and evaporated almost immediately after exhalation, thus affecting the removal of particles through evaporation rather than displacement by ventilation.
Conclusions: Significant differences between emissions from the tested e- and conventional cigarettes are reported. Exhaled e-cigarette particles are liquid droplets evaporating rapidly; conventional cigarette smoke particles are far more stable and linger.
Implications: • Several factors potentially influencing particle behavior after exhalation of e-cigarette aerosols or emitted during smoking conventional cigarettes were studied.• Differences in particle size between those exhaled following use of e-cigarettes and those emitted during smoking of conventional cigarettes were observed.• E-cigarette particle concentrations decreased rapidly following exhalation due to evaporation.• The removal of particles following smoking conventional cigarettes was much slower and was dependent on the room ventilation rate.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Short-term effects of electronic and tobacco cigarettes on exhaled nitric oxide.Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014 Jul 1;278(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Apr 13. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014. PMID: 24732441 Clinical Trial.
-
Predicted Deposition of E-Cigarette Aerosol in the Human Lungs.J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2016 Jun;29(3):299-309. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1268. Epub 2016 Feb 23. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2016. PMID: 26907696
-
Influential parameters on particle concentration and size distribution in the mainstream of e-cigarettes.Environ Pollut. 2014 Jan;184:523-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Oct 27. Environ Pollut. 2014. PMID: 24172659
-
Electronic cigarettes in the indoor environment.Rev Environ Health. 2019 Jun 26;34(2):105-124. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2019-0012. Rev Environ Health. 2019. PMID: 31112510 Review.
-
Electronic cigarettes and indoor air quality: a review of studies using human volunteers.Rev Environ Health. 2017 Sep 26;32(3):235-244. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2016-0059. Rev Environ Health. 2017. PMID: 28107173 Review.
Cited by
-
Identification of newly formed toxic chemicals in E-cigarette aerosols with Orbitrap mass spectrometry and implications on E-cigarette control.Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester). 2021 Apr;27(2-4):141-148. doi: 10.1177/14690667211040207. Epub 2021 Aug 27. Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester). 2021. PMID: 34448631 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of electronic cigarette atomising power and flavour on aerosol size-segregated metal concentration and inhalation risk.Tob Control. 2025 Jan 15:tc-2024-058915. doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-058915. Online ahead of print. Tob Control. 2025. PMID: 39814527
-
Aerial Transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus through Environmental E-Cigarette Aerosols: Implications for Public Policies.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1437. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041437. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33546515 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of vape shop built environment: airborne nicotine, particulate matter, ventilation, hazard identification, workplace practices, and safety perceptions.Ann Work Expo Health. 2025 Jun 30;69(5):510-519. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf018. Ann Work Expo Health. 2025. PMID: 40577798 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of flavoring compounds used in electronic cigarette refill liquids on endothelial and vascular function.PLoS One. 2019 Sep 9;14(9):e0222152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222152. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31498828 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McNeill A, Brose LS, Calder R, Hitchman SC, Hajek P, McRobbie H.. E-Cigarettes : An Evidence Update A Report Commissioned by Public Health England (Published August 2015).www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/454516.... Published Accessed November6, 2017.
-
- Bullen C, Howe C, Laugesen M, et al. . Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9905):1629–1637. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical