Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020;27(6):848-856.
doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0067. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

Echocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: A literature review

Affiliations
Review

Echocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: A literature review

Aleksandra Liżewska-Springer et al. Cardiol J. 2020.

Abstract

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-known treatment option for patients with symptomatic drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (AF). Multiple factors have been identified to determine AF recurrence after CA, however their predictive value is rather small. Identification of novel predictors of CA outcome is therefore of primary importance to reduce health costs and improve long-term results of intervention. The recurrence of AF following CA is related to severity of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, extent of atrial dilatation and fibrosis. The aim of this paper was to present and discuss the latest studies on the utility of echocardiographic parameters in terms of CA effectiveness in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF.

Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCO databases were searched for studies reporting echocardiographic preprocedural predictors of AF recurrence after CA. LV systolic and diastolic function, as well as atrial size, strain and dyssynchrony were taken into consideration.

Results: Twenty one full-text articles were analyzed, including three meta-analyses. Several echocardiographic parameters have been reported to determine a risk of AF recurrence after CA. There are conventional methods that measure left atrial size and volume, LV ejection fraction, parameters assessing LV diastolic dysfunction, and methods using more innovative technologies based on speckle tracking echocardiography to determine left atrial synchrony and strain. Each of these parameters has its own predictive value.

Conclusions: Regarding CA effectiveness, every patient has to be evaluated individually to estimate the risk of AF recurrence, optimally using a combination of several echocardiographic parameters.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; echocardiography; predictors; pulmonary vein isolation; recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;2016;37(38):2893–2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vizzardi E, Curnis A, Latini MG, et al. Risk factors for atrial fibrillation recurrence: a literature review. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2014;15(3):235–253. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328358554b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burstein B, Nattel S. Atrial fibrosis: mechanisms and clinical relevance in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(8):802–809. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.064. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vaziri SM, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, et al. Echocardiographic predictors of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1994;89(2):724–730. - PubMed
    1. Berruezo A, Tamborero D, Mont L, et al. Pre-procedural predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(7):836–841. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm027. - DOI - PubMed